Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Seismicity and return period investigation of destructive earthquake in Makran subduction zone
View through CrossRef
AbstractThis work uses the frequency-magnitude relation for the earthquakes to analyze seismicity and return period for the earthquakes in Makran subduction and its adjacent region. The data for seismicity analysis and return period range from 1934 to 2022, with moment magnitude and depth ranging from 4.0 to 8.1 and 0 to 115 km. The b-values for eastern and western Makran are obtained by the maximum likelihood technique of 0.7 ± 0.04 and 0.764 ± 0.04, respectively. The temporal decrease of the b-value of the eastern and western vicinities of Makran suggests that stress levels in both regions are increasing, indicating potential big earthquakes may occur subsequentially. Similarly, the spatial variation of the b-value also suggests that stress in both areas is increasing. Notably, the change in the b-value is inversely proportional to the stress level in the region. If the stress level increases, the b-value decreases, and vice versa. The earthquake return periods with magnitude 5 and 5.5 vary from 1 to 2.7 and 2 to 8 years, and magnitude 6 and 6.5 vary from 5 to 30 and 10 to 60 years, respectively. The earthquake return periods with magnitude 7 and 7.5 vary from 20 to 120 and 50 to 300 years, and magnitude 8 and 8.5 range from 100 to 600 and 200 to 1200 years, respectively. The finding demonstrates that both the eastern and western vicinities of the Makran fault zone have high tectonic stress, and significant big earthquakes may occur in the future.
Title: Seismicity and return period investigation of destructive earthquake in Makran subduction zone
Description:
AbstractThis work uses the frequency-magnitude relation for the earthquakes to analyze seismicity and return period for the earthquakes in Makran subduction and its adjacent region.
The data for seismicity analysis and return period range from 1934 to 2022, with moment magnitude and depth ranging from 4.
0 to 8.
1 and 0 to 115 km.
The b-values for eastern and western Makran are obtained by the maximum likelihood technique of 0.
7 ± 0.
04 and 0.
764 ± 0.
04, respectively.
The temporal decrease of the b-value of the eastern and western vicinities of Makran suggests that stress levels in both regions are increasing, indicating potential big earthquakes may occur subsequentially.
Similarly, the spatial variation of the b-value also suggests that stress in both areas is increasing.
Notably, the change in the b-value is inversely proportional to the stress level in the region.
If the stress level increases, the b-value decreases, and vice versa.
The earthquake return periods with magnitude 5 and 5.
5 vary from 1 to 2.
7 and 2 to 8 years, and magnitude 6 and 6.
5 vary from 5 to 30 and 10 to 60 years, respectively.
The earthquake return periods with magnitude 7 and 7.
5 vary from 20 to 120 and 50 to 300 years, and magnitude 8 and 8.
5 range from 100 to 600 and 200 to 1200 years, respectively.
The finding demonstrates that both the eastern and western vicinities of the Makran fault zone have high tectonic stress, and significant big earthquakes may occur in the future.
Related Results
An investigation on possibilty of creep on the Makran subduction zone based on deformation data
An investigation on possibilty of creep on the Makran subduction zone based on deformation data
<p>Long term crustal flow of the Makran subduction zone is computed with a kinematic finite element model based on iterated weighted least squares fits to data. Data ...
Comparison of Seismicity Between the Subduction Zone and Local Fault Zone in the Bali Island Region During the 1963–2023 Period Using the Likelihood Method
Comparison of Seismicity Between the Subduction Zone and Local Fault Zone in the Bali Island Region During the 1963–2023 Period Using the Likelihood Method
Research has been conducted on the comparison of seismicity between the subduction zone and the local fault zone in the Bali Island region during the 1963–2023 period. This researc...
Geodynamic modelling of continental subduction beneath oceanic lithosphere
Geodynamic modelling of continental subduction beneath oceanic lithosphere
Subduction of an oceanic plate beneath either an oceanic, or a continental, overriding plate requires two main conditions to occur in a steady state: i) a high enough subduction ra...
Geodynamics and Structural Evolution of Makran Accretionary Prism, Arabian-Eurasian Convergent Plate Boundary
Geodynamics and Structural Evolution of Makran Accretionary Prism, Arabian-Eurasian Convergent Plate Boundary
The complex interplay between thrust wedge deformation, tectonically-induced fluid overpressures, and the complex phases of wedge-top sedimentary depositional systems in accretiona...
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Tectonic earthquake swarms exhibit a distinct temporal and spatial pattern compared to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Unlike the latter ones, where the earthquake sequence typical...
Seismicity Pattern Changes Prior to the 2008 Ms7.3 Yutian Earthquake
Seismicity Pattern Changes Prior to the 2008 Ms7.3 Yutian Earthquake
Seismicity pattern changes that are associated with strong earthquakes are an interesting topic with potential applications for natural hazard mitigation. As a retrospective case s...
Tracing hotspot traces in the Andes
Tracing hotspot traces in the Andes
Two segments of subduction of the Nazca plate beneath the South American plate occur at low angles based on seismic hypocenter locations, approaching nearly horizontal below ~100 k...
Study the Geospace impact and the re-occurrence of pre-earthquake signals in the atmosphere: Preliminary analysis for the 2024 M 7.0 Cape Mendocino, CA and 2025 M 7.1 Southern Tibetan Plateau Earthquakes.
Study the Geospace impact and the re-occurrence of pre-earthquake signals in the atmosphere: Preliminary analysis for the 2024 M 7.0 Cape Mendocino, CA and 2025 M 7.1 Southern Tibetan Plateau Earthquakes.
This study explores the processes of generating pre-earthquake abnormalities in the atmosphere/ionosphere associated with significant seismicity. We analyzed two major earthquakes ...

