Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Theory in practice: Slobodan Jovanović as a witness to his own political activities
View through CrossRef
Slobodan Jovanović was one of the most prominent Serbian and Yugoslav scholars of the late
19th and mid-20th centuries. His works span a wide range of academic disciplines, placing him
among the most distinguished jurists, historians, writers, literary critics, and political scientists in the
former Yugoslavia.
In terms of his career, he served as a university professor, Dean of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, Rector of the University of Belgrade, and President of the Serbian Royal Academy. In the
realm of public engagement, he participated as an expert at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919. He
was also the President of the Serbian Cultural Club from 1937 to 1941.
Following the military coup of March 27, 1941, in the later years of his life, Jovanović became
actively engaged in practical politics for the first time. It was during this period that he began applying
his political theory in real-world governance. In the coup-installed government led by General Dušan
Simović, Jovanović served as Deputy Prime Minister from March 27, 1941, to January 11, 1942. He
subsequently assumed the role of Prime Minister of the Royal Yugoslav Government-in-Exile in London, holding this position from January 11, 1942, until June 26, 1943.
After the Second World War, Jovanović authored memoirs that provide valuable insight into
the evolution of his political thought during exile, offering a contrast with the theoretical frameworks
he developed prior to the war. His reflections reveal critical dimensions of the diplomatic and political
relations between the Yugoslav government-in-exile and the United Kingdom.
Notably, Jovanović expressed dissatisfaction with several aspects of British foreign policy,
particularly its approach toward Yugoslavia and the Serbian people. A staunch supporter of General Dragoljub Mihailović’s movement–which he viewed as both lawful and legitimate–Jovanović
worked to secure international recognition of Mihailović’s forces as the official Yugoslav Army in
the Homeland. These efforts, however, failed to yield results, as neither Britain nor the other Allied
powers extended formal support or recognition. This ultimately culminated in disappointment and
condemnation in his homeland.
Jovanović’s writings also shed light on deep internal divisions within the government-in-exile, particularly the tensions with Croatian representatives. These unresolved frictions, combined
with shifting geopolitical realities, culminated in the signing of the Šubašić–Tito Agreement and
Jovanović’s subsequent withdrawal from political life. Slobodan Jovanović spent the end of the war in exile, where he remained until his death on December 12, 1958. As a member and later Prime Minister of the Yugoslav government-in-exile–which
sought to preserve the continuity of the pre-war regime–he was tried and convicted in absentia by the
new Yugoslav authorities. For a quarter of a century, his works were consigned to oblivion, remaining
largely inaccessible until 1990. He was officially rehabilitated in 2007.
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Title: Theory in practice: Slobodan Jovanović as a witness to his own political activities
Description:
Slobodan Jovanović was one of the most prominent Serbian and Yugoslav scholars of the late
19th and mid-20th centuries.
His works span a wide range of academic disciplines, placing him
among the most distinguished jurists, historians, writers, literary critics, and political scientists in the
former Yugoslavia.
In terms of his career, he served as a university professor, Dean of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, Rector of the University of Belgrade, and President of the Serbian Royal Academy.
In the
realm of public engagement, he participated as an expert at the Paris Peace Conference in 1919.
He
was also the President of the Serbian Cultural Club from 1937 to 1941.
Following the military coup of March 27, 1941, in the later years of his life, Jovanović became
actively engaged in practical politics for the first time.
It was during this period that he began applying
his political theory in real-world governance.
In the coup-installed government led by General Dušan
Simović, Jovanović served as Deputy Prime Minister from March 27, 1941, to January 11, 1942.
He
subsequently assumed the role of Prime Minister of the Royal Yugoslav Government-in-Exile in London, holding this position from January 11, 1942, until June 26, 1943.
After the Second World War, Jovanović authored memoirs that provide valuable insight into
the evolution of his political thought during exile, offering a contrast with the theoretical frameworks
he developed prior to the war.
His reflections reveal critical dimensions of the diplomatic and political
relations between the Yugoslav government-in-exile and the United Kingdom.
Notably, Jovanović expressed dissatisfaction with several aspects of British foreign policy,
particularly its approach toward Yugoslavia and the Serbian people.
A staunch supporter of General Dragoljub Mihailović’s movement–which he viewed as both lawful and legitimate–Jovanović
worked to secure international recognition of Mihailović’s forces as the official Yugoslav Army in
the Homeland.
These efforts, however, failed to yield results, as neither Britain nor the other Allied
powers extended formal support or recognition.
This ultimately culminated in disappointment and
condemnation in his homeland.
Jovanović’s writings also shed light on deep internal divisions within the government-in-exile, particularly the tensions with Croatian representatives.
These unresolved frictions, combined
with shifting geopolitical realities, culminated in the signing of the Šubašić–Tito Agreement and
Jovanović’s subsequent withdrawal from political life.
Slobodan Jovanović spent the end of the war in exile, where he remained until his death on December 12, 1958.
As a member and later Prime Minister of the Yugoslav government-in-exile–which
sought to preserve the continuity of the pre-war regime–he was tried and convicted in absentia by the
new Yugoslav authorities.
For a quarter of a century, his works were consigned to oblivion, remaining
largely inaccessible until 1990.
He was officially rehabilitated in 2007.
Related Results
Italy in the writings of Slobodan Jovanovic
Italy in the writings of Slobodan Jovanovic
Slobodan Jovanovic made frequent stays in Italy since his earliest childhood,
which contributed to his thorough and comprehensive understanding of Italian
history, politics, ...
Ary Scheffer, een Nederlandse Fransman
Ary Scheffer, een Nederlandse Fransman
AbstractAry Scheffer (1795-1858) is so generally included in the French School (Note 2)- unsurprisingly, since his career was confined almost entirely to Paris - that the fact that...
If I Had Possession over Judgment Day: Augmenting Robert Johnson
If I Had Possession over Judgment Day: Augmenting Robert Johnson
augmentvb [ɔːgˈmɛnt]1. to make or become greater in number, amount, strength, etc.; increase2. Music: to increase (a major or perfect interval) by a semitone (Collins English Dicti...
Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret By Dorian Vale
Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret By Dorian Vale
Against the Compulsive Urge to Interpret
By Dorian Vale
In this incisive essay, Dorian Vale issues a direct challenge to the modern compulsion to interpret everything—especially ...
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Henry Lives! Learning from Lawson Fandom
Since his death in 1922, Henry Lawson’s “spirit” has been kept alive by admirers across Australia. Over the last century, Lawson’s reputation in the academy has fluctuated yet fan ...
Eyewitnesses versus assistant witnesses
Eyewitnesses versus assistant witnesses
According to the current legislation in Romania, the witness is a procedural subject. The criminal procedural law in Romania does not distinguish between the eyewitness and the ass...
The Custodian of Consequence: Reframing the Role of the Critic By Dorian Vale
The Custodian of Consequence: Reframing the Role of the Critic By Dorian Vale
The Custodian of Consequence: Reframing the Role of the Critic
By Dorian Vale
In this philosophical essay, Dorian Vale redefines the role of the critic—not as interpreter, judge,...
Canon of Witnesses: On Zarina Hashmi's Home Is a Foreign Place
Canon of Witnesses: On Zarina Hashmi's Home Is a Foreign Place
Canon of Witnesses: On Zarina Hashmi’s Home Is a Foreign Place
By Dorian Vale
In this elegiac and piercing reflection, Dorian Vale inducts Zarina Hashmi into the Canon of Witness...

