Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Can institutional quality reduce geopolitical risk? Evidence from G20 countries
View through CrossRef
The existing body of literature encompasses the dimensions of institutional quality, as well as their relationships with various sectors, including foreign direct investment, trade, economic growth and the energy sector. However, a significant gap remains between institutional quality and geopolitical risk relationships. To investigate the association between institutional quality and geopolitical risk, we utilize panel vector autoregression and generalized method of moments on panel data for G20 countries from 2002 to 2022. Results from panel vector autoregression-generalized method of moments reveal that higher institutional quality, particularly political stability, plays a crucial mitigating role in reducing long-term geopolitical risk, indicating primarily unidirectional causality from institutions to geopolitical risk. However, geopolitical risk is persistent and self-reinforcing over time, with only limited and short-term effects on institutional indicators such as government effectiveness, political stability and rule of law, supporting weak reverse causality. Granger causality tests confirm limited bidirectionality, with institutional quality driving geopolitical risk reductions rather than vice versa.
Title: Can institutional quality reduce geopolitical risk? Evidence from G20 countries
Description:
The existing body of literature encompasses the dimensions of institutional quality, as well as their relationships with various sectors, including foreign direct investment, trade, economic growth and the energy sector.
However, a significant gap remains between institutional quality and geopolitical risk relationships.
To investigate the association between institutional quality and geopolitical risk, we utilize panel vector autoregression and generalized method of moments on panel data for G20 countries from 2002 to 2022.
Results from panel vector autoregression-generalized method of moments reveal that higher institutional quality, particularly political stability, plays a crucial mitigating role in reducing long-term geopolitical risk, indicating primarily unidirectional causality from institutions to geopolitical risk.
However, geopolitical risk is persistent and self-reinforcing over time, with only limited and short-term effects on institutional indicators such as government effectiveness, political stability and rule of law, supporting weak reverse causality.
Granger causality tests confirm limited bidirectionality, with institutional quality driving geopolitical risk reductions rather than vice versa.
Related Results
Perspective of G20 along with India’s Cultural Values
Perspective of G20 along with India’s Cultural Values
India is one of the founding members of the G20, a premier forum for international economic cooperation. India will hold the presidency of the G20 from December 1, 2022, to Novembe...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Assessing Geopolitical Risks and Their Economic Impact on the USA Using Data Analytics
Assessing Geopolitical Risks and Their Economic Impact on the USA Using Data Analytics
Understanding geopolitical risks is a paramount aspect of examining the stability and resilience of national economies, specifically in today’s rapidly evolving global surroundings...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Pentingnya Juru Bicara Sebagai Komunikator Politik Pada Presidensi G20 Indonesia
Pentingnya Juru Bicara Sebagai Komunikator Politik Pada Presidensi G20 Indonesia
Juru bicara adalah perwakilan suara dari suatu kelompok, lembaga ataupun organisasi yang dipercaya untuk menyampaikan pesan kepada khalayak ramai. Seorang juru bicara dapat berpera...
Contemplating G20 Presidency Branding and Impression Management - Local and Global Contextual Organization Perspectives
Contemplating G20 Presidency Branding and Impression Management - Local and Global Contextual Organization Perspectives
This review seeks to examine the effectiveness of impression management through the lens of the G20 Presidency branding for lessons in the efforts of organizations when expanding i...
Institutional varieties and entrepreneurship: an empirical analysis
Institutional varieties and entrepreneurship: an empirical analysis
A growing body of literature on comparative international entrepreneurship has focussed on exploring the factors that explain differences in entrepreneurial activity across countri...
Nuclear Weapon Discussion on G20 Forum
Nuclear Weapon Discussion on G20 Forum
Indonesia holds a key role as host of the G20 Presidency in 2022. Many international media highlighted this summit and the issues that has been discussed inside.As a world economic...

