P3529Prognostic impact of cohabitation status in hospitalized patients with acute heart failure

Abstract Background The prevalence of heart failure (HF) in the elderly is steadily increasing, therefore, the prudent care and treatment according to individual's characteristics, comorbidities, or prognosis, should be prerequisite. Although cohabitations status in each elderly patient is different, an association of this condition with long-term prognosis remains to be identified definitively in Japan. Purpose The purpose of the present study was to examine the prognostic impact of cohabitation status on 3-year mortality among hospitalized acute HF patients. Methods The study population comprised a total of 817 individuals who were hospitalized for acute HF between November 2009 and December 2015, and was followed up for 3 years. We classified patients into three groups (cohabitation with spouse, cohabitation with another generation, and living alone). We evaluated relative predictive values between these three groups for 3-year mortality by Cox regression model. Results The median age was 79 (interquartile range 70–85) years, and 55.7% of the subjects were male. Median length of hospital stay was 16 (interquartile range 11–23) days. The distribution of three groups was cohabitation with spouse (50.9%), cohabitation with another generation (28.5%), and living alone (20.6%). The overall rate of 3-year mortality was 32.2% (n=263), 31.5% (n=131) in cohabitation with spouse, 38.2% (n=89) in cohabitation with another generation, and 25.6% (n=43) in living alone. Cohabitation with another generation was significantly related to the occurrence of 3-year mortality by univariate analysis (P<0.001). Age (84 years vs. 77 years), the frequency of female (69.1% vs. 33.4%), left ventricular ejection fraction (52.7% vs. 47.5%) were significantly greater, whereas body mass index (21.2 vs. 22.6), smoking status (27.0% vs. 53.4%), ischemic etiology (27.5% vs. 35.6%), and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (32.2% vs. 41.4%) and atrial fibrillation (20.6% vs. 29.8%) were significantly (P<0.05) smaller in cohabitation with another generation than others. The ratio of home return and optimal medical therapy were similar between the 2 groups. Cohabitation with another generation was associated with higher relative risk of 3-year mortality than living alone [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.65; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.15–2.38, P=0.007], or cohabitation with spouse (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.12–1.92, P=0.006). Multivariable Cox regression model, with adjustment for age, albumin, brain natriuretic peptide, and prior HF hospitalization, revealed that cohabitation with another generation was no longer significant. Conclusion Our present results suggest that cohabitation status affected on long-term prognosis in patients with HF, especially cohabitation with another generation posed as worst predictor. We should pay more attention to social factors including cohabitation status in the clinical practice.