Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Why Can't Private Art “Trophies” Go Home from the War?

View through CrossRef
AbstractThis article is dedicated to the collection from the Bremen Kunsthalle, comprising 1715 drawings, 50 paintings, and about 3000 prints found by Soviet troops in castle of Karnzow near Berlin in May 1945. The collection was not seized by Soviet trophy brigades but was looted by soldiers and officers of the 38th Field Engineers' Brigade of the Red Army.After their return to the USSR and demobilization, some of the officers donated their loot to different museums around the Soviet Union. One of the most important parts of the collection, with 362 drawings and two paintings—among them works of Dürer, Rembrandt, Goya, and Van Gogh, was appropriated by Captain Viktor Baldin. In 1948 Baldin deposited his loot in the A. V. Shchusev State Research Museum of Architecture in Moscow. Later Baldin became the director of the museum and advocated return of the art to its rightful owners.Since the days of Gorbachev's perestroika, these art works have frequently attracted public attention and provoked fierce debates. The Federal Law on Cultural Valuables adopted in 1998 did not cover art works looted by private individuals. Rather, such conflicts have to be solved within the framework of Russian criminal law.In contrast, other works of art from the same Bremen Kunsthalle collection were restituted from the United States, Ukraine, and Estonia. Another 101 drawings and prints of the collection, seized by another member of Baldin's brigade, were returned from Russia to Bremen in 2000, but that was in “exchange” for an original mosaic from the legendary Amber Chamber. However, despite more than 20 years of efforts by German officials and endless negotiations, the Baldin Collection remains in the Russian Federation. The return of those stolen drawings any time soon now looks highly improbable. The case of the Baldin Collection became the most striking example of the Russian nonrestitution of cultural property looted during World War II.
Title: Why Can't Private Art “Trophies” Go Home from the War?
Description:
AbstractThis article is dedicated to the collection from the Bremen Kunsthalle, comprising 1715 drawings, 50 paintings, and about 3000 prints found by Soviet troops in castle of Karnzow near Berlin in May 1945.
The collection was not seized by Soviet trophy brigades but was looted by soldiers and officers of the 38th Field Engineers' Brigade of the Red Army.
After their return to the USSR and demobilization, some of the officers donated their loot to different museums around the Soviet Union.
One of the most important parts of the collection, with 362 drawings and two paintings—among them works of Dürer, Rembrandt, Goya, and Van Gogh, was appropriated by Captain Viktor Baldin.
In 1948 Baldin deposited his loot in the A.
V.
Shchusev State Research Museum of Architecture in Moscow.
Later Baldin became the director of the museum and advocated return of the art to its rightful owners.
Since the days of Gorbachev's perestroika, these art works have frequently attracted public attention and provoked fierce debates.
The Federal Law on Cultural Valuables adopted in 1998 did not cover art works looted by private individuals.
Rather, such conflicts have to be solved within the framework of Russian criminal law.
In contrast, other works of art from the same Bremen Kunsthalle collection were restituted from the United States, Ukraine, and Estonia.
Another 101 drawings and prints of the collection, seized by another member of Baldin's brigade, were returned from Russia to Bremen in 2000, but that was in “exchange” for an original mosaic from the legendary Amber Chamber.
However, despite more than 20 years of efforts by German officials and endless negotiations, the Baldin Collection remains in the Russian Federation.
The return of those stolen drawings any time soon now looks highly improbable.
The case of the Baldin Collection became the most striking example of the Russian nonrestitution of cultural property looted during World War II.

Related Results

Prostor doma u hrvatskim igranim filmovima s temom domovinskog rata
Prostor doma u hrvatskim igranim filmovima s temom domovinskog rata
The dissertation explores the formation of domestic space in contemporary Croatian society through its presentations in the medium of feature films. The cinematic domestic spaces a...
Everyday Life in the "Tourist Zone"
Everyday Life in the "Tourist Zone"
This article makes a case for the everyday while on tour and argues that the ability to continue with everyday routines and social relationships, while at the same time moving thro...
Persons and Their Private Personas: Living with Yourself
Persons and Their Private Personas: Living with Yourself
Public life is usually understood to be whatever we do or say in our formal and professional relationships. At the workplace, at the doctor’s office or at the café, we need to make...
De gevel – een intermediair element tussen buiten en binnen
De gevel – een intermediair element tussen buiten en binnen
This study is based on the fact that all people have a basic need for protection from other people (and animals) as well as from the elements (the exterior climate). People need a ...
Adverbs in -ως in Documents of Graeco-Roman Egypt
Adverbs in -ως in Documents of Graeco-Roman Egypt
This book is part of an ongoing research to investigate adverbials in the ancient Greek language. This first volume is devoted to the use of the adverbs in -ως in texts from Graeco...
Emotional Memory Forever: The Cinematography of Paul Ewing
Emotional Memory Forever: The Cinematography of Paul Ewing
Over a period of ten years Paul Ewing documented the life of his family on film – initially using Super 8 film and then converting to VHS with the advent of the new technology. Thr...

Back to Top