Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Carl Schmitt Revisited by the United States and the Terrorist

View through CrossRef
In the article “Carl Schmitt Revisited by the United States and the Terrorist” it is shown that Carl Schmitt’s morals, standards and views can be noticed in the United States policy in the context of so-called “war on terror”. According to the article, Islamic terrorists are a mirror image of Schmittan revolutionary partisan. It is discussed how terrorists are, as a problem, treated by the USA, which in author’s opinion displays many Schmittan features. Schmitt is one of the few who claim that the sovereign state is above the legal order and can set boundaries. It is therefore shown that the USA seem to have rushed into Schmittan “state of exception”, where norms are suspended in order to achieve security, resembling the thinking of the G.W. Bush administration. It is illustrated how the USA seem to be following Schmitt’s ideology, especially by making exceptions to international rules, but also putting the terrorist outside of the scope of international regulations. Lastly, author tries to answer the question if it is justified to follow Schmitt and obey to the rule of law.
Stowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spolecznej - Sekcja Polska IVR
Title: Carl Schmitt Revisited by the United States and the Terrorist
Description:
In the article “Carl Schmitt Revisited by the United States and the Terrorist” it is shown that Carl Schmitt’s morals, standards and views can be noticed in the United States policy in the context of so-called “war on terror”.
According to the article, Islamic terrorists are a mirror image of Schmittan revolutionary partisan.
It is discussed how terrorists are, as a problem, treated by the USA, which in author’s opinion displays many Schmittan features.
Schmitt is one of the few who claim that the sovereign state is above the legal order and can set boundaries.
It is therefore shown that the USA seem to have rushed into Schmittan “state of exception”, where norms are suspended in order to achieve security, resembling the thinking of the G.
W.
Bush administration.
It is illustrated how the USA seem to be following Schmitt’s ideology, especially by making exceptions to international rules, but also putting the terrorist outside of the scope of international regulations.
Lastly, author tries to answer the question if it is justified to follow Schmitt and obey to the rule of law.

Related Results

From extreme beliefs to actual violence
From extreme beliefs to actual violence
This dissertation addresses the question of what factors and processes explain pathways of individuals with extreme beliefs towards different outcomes, including violent actions (e...
Ni Karl Marx ni Max Weber. Carl Schmitt y la tiranía de los valores / Neither Karl Marx nor Max Weber. Carl Schmitt and the tyranny of values
Ni Karl Marx ni Max Weber. Carl Schmitt y la tiranía de los valores / Neither Karl Marx nor Max Weber. Carl Schmitt and the tyranny of values
En el presente artículo no trata de ver qué pensador motivó a Carl Schmitt a escribir La tiranía de los valores sino de analizar los matices presentes en la edición privada de 1959...
Perilous Futures
Perilous Futures
The book re-examines Carl Schmitt’s late work, which until fairly recently received less attention because of its seemingly non-systematic nature. The study focuses on Schmitt’s ma...
CARL SCHMITT’İN MODERN ANAYASACILIK ELEŞTİRİSİNİN FRIEDRICH AUGUST VON HAYEK ÜZERİNDEN DÜŞÜNÜLMESİ
CARL SCHMITT’İN MODERN ANAYASACILIK ELEŞTİRİSİNİN FRIEDRICH AUGUST VON HAYEK ÜZERİNDEN DÜŞÜNÜLMESİ
Carl Schmitt’in liberal, burjuva anayasal devletinin eleştirisi, parlamenter sistemin boşlukları üzerine kurulmuştur. Friedrich August Von Hayek, Schmitt tarafından eleştirilen sis...
Carl Schmitt and Ossip Flechtheim at Nuremberg: A Crossroads for International Justice and Intellectual History
Carl Schmitt and Ossip Flechtheim at Nuremberg: A Crossroads for International Justice and Intellectual History
AbstractShould theoretical discourse supporting state crimes be protected as free speech or prosecuted as atrocity speech? The relationship between Neo-Hobbesian Nazi collaborator ...
Threat of committing a terrorist act
Threat of committing a terrorist act
The article is devoted to the debatable issues of interpretation of the concept of the threat of committing a terrorist act and its signs. There is still no unity of opinion regard...
14 December 1930: Robert Musil Meets Carl Schmitt
14 December 1930: Robert Musil Meets Carl Schmitt
This article takes a concrete event as its starting point: on 14 December 1930, Robert Musil met Carl Schmitt when Musil visited Schmitt at his home in Berlin after having expresse...

Back to Top