Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Is oral lichen planus a risk factor for peri-implant diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background : To evaluate whether oral lichen planus (OLP) is a risk factor for peri-implant diseases (PIDs) with a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods : Six electronic databases including Medline, Web of Science, etc. were searched. Included studies are observational human studies written in English. Population of interest were those with/without OLP who received dental implant treatment. Follow-up time after implantation is from one month to 20 years. The quality of the included literature regarding risk of bias and methodology was assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The data involving exposure (OLP), primary outcomes (implants having PIDs) and secondary outcomes (probing depth/PD, bleeding on probing/BOP and bone loss/BL) and potential confounders were extracted. Heterogeneity was assessed by I² tests. Dichotomous data were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) which were calculated with a fixed effect model. Results : Of 139 literatures, two studies were enrolled and evaluated as high quality, which totally contained 68 participants receiving 222 (OLP vs. non-OLP, 112 vs. 110) implants with 12 to 120-month follow-up time. Proportions of implants with PIDs between OLP and non-OLP groups were as follows: 19.6% (22/112) vs. 22.7% (25/110) for PIM; 17.0% (19/112) vs. 10.9% (12/110) for PI. Meta-analysis found no recognizable difference in number of implants with PIDs (PI: RR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.77-2.90, P = 0.24; PIM:RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.53 -1.46, P = 0.61; PIDs: RR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.75 -1.55, P = 0.68) or BOP (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.70-1.15, P = 0.40) between OLP and non-OLP groups. Conclusions : Available literature regarding the effects of OLP on PIDs remains very limited. Existing evidence seems not support OLP as a suspected risk factor for PIDs. Large-scale prospective trials are required to test the findings. Keywords : dental implants; peri-implant diseases; oral lichen planus; systematic review; meta-analysis.
Title: Is oral lichen planus a risk factor for peri-implant diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Description:
Abstract Background : To evaluate whether oral lichen planus (OLP) is a risk factor for peri-implant diseases (PIDs) with a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods : Six electronic databases including Medline, Web of Science, etc.
were searched.
Included studies are observational human studies written in English.
Population of interest were those with/without OLP who received dental implant treatment.
Follow-up time after implantation is from one month to 20 years.
The quality of the included literature regarding risk of bias and methodology was assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
The data involving exposure (OLP), primary outcomes (implants having PIDs) and secondary outcomes (probing depth/PD, bleeding on probing/BOP and bone loss/BL) and potential confounders were extracted.
Heterogeneity was assessed by I² tests.
Dichotomous data were expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) which were calculated with a fixed effect model.
Results : Of 139 literatures, two studies were enrolled and evaluated as high quality, which totally contained 68 participants receiving 222 (OLP vs.
non-OLP, 112 vs.
110) implants with 12 to 120-month follow-up time.
Proportions of implants with PIDs between OLP and non-OLP groups were as follows: 19.
6% (22/112) vs.
22.
7% (25/110) for PIM; 17.
0% (19/112) vs.
10.
9% (12/110) for PI.
Meta-analysis found no recognizable difference in number of implants with PIDs (PI: RR = 1.
49, 95% CI 0.
77-2.
90, P = 0.
24; PIM:RR = 0.
88, 95% CI 0.
53 -1.
46, P = 0.
61; PIDs: RR = 1.
08, 95% CI 0.
75 -1.
55, P = 0.
68) or BOP (RR = 0.
90, 95% CI: 0.
70-1.
15, P = 0.
40) between OLP and non-OLP groups.
Conclusions : Available literature regarding the effects of OLP on PIDs remains very limited.
Existing evidence seems not support OLP as a suspected risk factor for PIDs.
Large-scale prospective trials are required to test the findings.
Keywords : dental implants; peri-implant diseases; oral lichen planus; systematic review; meta-analysis.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Salivary Diagnosis: Detection of Several Intracellular Enzymes in Patients with Oral Lichen Planus
Salivary Diagnosis: Detection of Several Intracellular Enzymes in Patients with Oral Lichen Planus
 Introduction: Oral lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory disease, presenting malignant potential. An association between chronic inflammation and initiation and progression of c...
Homocysteine and other cardiovascular risk factors in patients with lichen planus
Homocysteine and other cardiovascular risk factors in patients with lichen planus
AbstractBackgroundChronic inflammation was found to play an important role in the development of cardiovascular risk factors. Homocysteine (Hcy) and fibrinogen have been identified...
Subgingival microbiome in patients with healthy and ailing dental implants
Subgingival microbiome in patients with healthy and ailing dental implants
AbstractDental implants are commonly used to replace missing teeth. However, the dysbiotic polymicrobial communities of peri-implant sites are responsible for peri-implant diseases...
Evaluation of the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma therapy in peri-implant soft tissue remodeling
Evaluation of the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma therapy in peri-implant soft tissue remodeling
Relevance. Peri-implant soft tissue management remains a frequent clinical challenge in dental practice. Adequate thickness and width of keratinized peri-implan...
Serum angiopoietin‐2 level as a novel potential biomarker in oral lichen planus
Serum angiopoietin‐2 level as a novel potential biomarker in oral lichen planus
AbstractBackgroundLichen planus is a common chronic cutaneous inflammatory disease. Recent advances evidenced that angiogenesis is tightly connected to it. More recently, the endot...
GUÍA DE PRÁCTICA CLÍNICA PARA LA PREVENCIÓN Y EL TRATAMIENTO DE ENFERMEDADES PERIIMPLANTARES
GUÍA DE PRÁCTICA CLÍNICA PARA LA PREVENCIÓN Y EL TRATAMIENTO DE ENFERMEDADES PERIIMPLANTARES
Introduction: the incidence of peri-implant diseases is high, and their optimal management is still debated. The purpose was to explore the levels of available evidence and to sugg...
Lichenoid vulvar dermatoses: clinical presentation, morphology, and dermatoscopic signs
Lichenoid vulvar dermatoses: clinical presentation, morphology, and dermatoscopic signs
Lichenoid vulvar dermatoses are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by a number of overlapping signs and/or morphological features. Clinical similarity is accounted for...

Back to Top