Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Socio-Legal Study Of Reservation in India With Special Reference To Human Rights

View through CrossRef
Reservation as a concept is very wide. Different people understand reservation to mean different things. One view of reservation as a generic concept is that reservation is an anti-poverty measure. There is a different view which says that reservations are merely providing a right of access and that it is not a right to redressal.1 In Constitution of India it states that Article 15 (which prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth) and article 16 (equality of opportunity) to insert new clauses that allow the government to make “special provision for the advancement of any economically weaker sections of citizen” other than SC/STs and OBCs. In the international human rights context, the State may modify their obligations under international human rights treaties by entering reservations. Reservations are a particularly technical area of international law, but the study of this rather dry in the context of international human rights law is enlightening. According to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties VCLT, reservation is “a unilateral statement… made by a state, when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty, where, it purports to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty. The aim of a reservation is to limit a state‟s obligations under a particular treaty. International Law is not formalistic „general political statement‟ or a „declaration of interpretation‟. States have availed themselves broadly of the possibility of reservations, both quantitatively and qualitatively. There is no doubt that the reservation is problematic for international human rights law. Human rights are clearly more of a „package‟ that most international normative instrument. Reservations also create problems legal certainty, making it difficult for individuals to ascertain the exact scope of the rights they have been guaranteed. In fact, international human rights law has also evolved specific notions of what reservations are permissible, who may decide on their permissibility, and what consequences flow from reservations.
Title: A Socio-Legal Study Of Reservation in India With Special Reference To Human Rights
Description:
Reservation as a concept is very wide.
Different people understand reservation to mean different things.
One view of reservation as a generic concept is that reservation is an anti-poverty measure.
There is a different view which says that reservations are merely providing a right of access and that it is not a right to redressal.
1 In Constitution of India it states that Article 15 (which prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth) and article 16 (equality of opportunity) to insert new clauses that allow the government to make “special provision for the advancement of any economically weaker sections of citizen” other than SC/STs and OBCs.
In the international human rights context, the State may modify their obligations under international human rights treaties by entering reservations.
Reservations are a particularly technical area of international law, but the study of this rather dry in the context of international human rights law is enlightening.
According to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties VCLT, reservation is “a unilateral statement… made by a state, when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty, where, it purports to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty.
The aim of a reservation is to limit a state‟s obligations under a particular treaty.
International Law is not formalistic „general political statement‟ or a „declaration of interpretation‟.
States have availed themselves broadly of the possibility of reservations, both quantitatively and qualitatively.
There is no doubt that the reservation is problematic for international human rights law.
Human rights are clearly more of a „package‟ that most international normative instrument.
Reservations also create problems legal certainty, making it difficult for individuals to ascertain the exact scope of the rights they have been guaranteed.
In fact, international human rights law has also evolved specific notions of what reservations are permissible, who may decide on their permissibility, and what consequences flow from reservations.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
Since the World War, international cooperation has been made to preserve the peace and interests of the human community, and representative results include the creation of internat...
China's Practices in Human Rights
China's Practices in Human Rights
Human rights used to be a sensitive topic in China. Before 1991, the Chinese government rarely took the initiative to participate in the formulation of international human rights r...
Corporations in Ukrainian Law
Corporations in Ukrainian Law
This article deals with the special development of the company (or rather corporate) law in Ukrainian legal system. The current legislation does not set the concept of corporation....
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
This study explores the enigma of happiness inequality between India and Pakistan, despite India’s economic prowess. Employing inequality regression models, the study pinpoints cru...

Back to Top