Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Endovascular management of acquired uterine vascular anomalies

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objectives To evaluate clinical presentation, imaging features, embolization techniques and their outcome for acquired uterine vascular anomalies (UVA) related to obstetric events. Materials and methods Thirteen women (mean age = 34; range = 20–40 years) who had undergone interventional radiological treatment of UVAs between 2013 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had a history of an obstetric event. They presented with ongoing postpartal vaginal blood losses (n = 11) or were asymptomatic (n = 2). Fertilization had been performed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 3/13 women. 7/13 women had delivered healthy babies. 6 women had surgical, drug-induced or missed abortions. Postpartum dilatation and curettage had been performed in 4 women. The delay between the obstetric/gynecological event and the radiological intervention ranged from 19 to 193 days (median = 49 days). Long-term follow-up was available in 12/13 patients (median FU = 2.4 years). Unilateral selective transcatheter embolization was performed in 7/12 patients (n-Butyl-Cyanoacrylate-Lipiodol mixture [BCAL], n = 5; trisacryl gelatine particles, n = 2); Bilateral uterine artery embolization was performed in 5/12 women (unilateral BCAL combined with contralateral particles in 3/12, or bilateral gelatine sponge slurry in 2/12). In one patient percutaneous direct injection of BCAL into a uterine artery branch pseudoaneurysm was performed. Results Primary clinical success without complications was achieved in 10/13 interventions. Re-embolization was successful in the 3 patients with ongoing bleeding despite uterine artery embolization. Follow-up information was available in 12/13 patients (median FU = 2.4 yrs). The pregnancy rate after embolization was 8/12women with a birth rate of 6/8 pregnancies. Conclusion Embolization of acquired UVAs is an effective and safe treatment. Preservation of uterine function for future pregnancy after uterine transarterial embolization seems warranted.
Title: Endovascular management of acquired uterine vascular anomalies
Description:
Abstract Objectives To evaluate clinical presentation, imaging features, embolization techniques and their outcome for acquired uterine vascular anomalies (UVA) related to obstetric events.
Materials and methods Thirteen women (mean age = 34; range = 20–40 years) who had undergone interventional radiological treatment of UVAs between 2013 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed.
All patients had a history of an obstetric event.
They presented with ongoing postpartal vaginal blood losses (n = 11) or were asymptomatic (n = 2).
Fertilization had been performed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 3/13 women.
7/13 women had delivered healthy babies.
6 women had surgical, drug-induced or missed abortions.
Postpartum dilatation and curettage had been performed in 4 women.
The delay between the obstetric/gynecological event and the radiological intervention ranged from 19 to 193 days (median = 49 days).
Long-term follow-up was available in 12/13 patients (median FU = 2.
4 years).
Unilateral selective transcatheter embolization was performed in 7/12 patients (n-Butyl-Cyanoacrylate-Lipiodol mixture [BCAL], n = 5; trisacryl gelatine particles, n = 2); Bilateral uterine artery embolization was performed in 5/12 women (unilateral BCAL combined with contralateral particles in 3/12, or bilateral gelatine sponge slurry in 2/12).
In one patient percutaneous direct injection of BCAL into a uterine artery branch pseudoaneurysm was performed.
Results Primary clinical success without complications was achieved in 10/13 interventions.
Re-embolization was successful in the 3 patients with ongoing bleeding despite uterine artery embolization.
Follow-up information was available in 12/13 patients (median FU = 2.
4 yrs).
The pregnancy rate after embolization was 8/12women with a birth rate of 6/8 pregnancies.
Conclusion Embolization of acquired UVAs is an effective and safe treatment.
Preservation of uterine function for future pregnancy after uterine transarterial embolization seems warranted.

Related Results

Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Successful surgical treatment of post-myomectomy uterine diverticulum: A case report
Successful surgical treatment of post-myomectomy uterine diverticulum: A case report
Abstract Background: Uterine diverticulum is classified into congenital and acquired types. The acquired type is caused by caesarean scar syndrome, which occurs after caesa...
CHANGES IN THE INTENSITY OF UTERINE CIRCULATION IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH A HISTORY OF CHRONIC ENDOMETRITIS
CHANGES IN THE INTENSITY OF UTERINE CIRCULATION IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH A HISTORY OF CHRONIC ENDOMETRITIS
Introduction. An essential prerequisite for the normal course of pregnancy is a complete gestational remodeling of the blood circulation, when the spiral arteries are transformed i...
Risk of Uterine Rupture and Dehiscence Among Women Attempting a Vaginal Birth After a Low Vertical Uterine Incision [A232]
Risk of Uterine Rupture and Dehiscence Among Women Attempting a Vaginal Birth After a Low Vertical Uterine Incision [A232]
INTRODUCTION: The risk of uterine rupture after a prior low vertical (LVCS) is unknown. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk of uterine rupture in indiv...

Back to Top