Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Submission and Taking of Evidence: Practice of the European union
View through CrossRef
The study's relevance is due to the adaptation of the mechanisms of legal regulation of procedural relations in Ukraine to the law of the European Union. The study aims to identify the forms and rules for collecting and presenting evidence in civil and commercial cases under the law of the European Union—research methods. Primary sources were studied in writing the article, including the European Union legislation. Scientific works of foreign authors devoted to individual aspects of the problem under study were analyzed. Achieving the outlined goal was made possible through the use of a complex of methods of scientific knowledge, in particular philosophical (Aristotelian), general scientific (descriptive, systemic, comparative, structural-functional), as well as special (developed by non-legal sciences, in particular, the analysis of written legal sources, cybernetic) and individual (developed by legal sciences: formal-dogmatic and special-legal) methods. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that this article is one of the first comprehensive studies of the features of collecting and presenting evidence in civil and commercial cases in the European Union. Results. The features of collecting and presenting evidence in civil and commercial cases according to the rules established in the European Union have been studied. The need to consider these features in Ukraine's procedural legislation and practice of application has been substantiated. Conclusions. The European Union consistently introduces innovative technologies into all spheres of life, as well as the digitalization of economic and judicial processes. Using electronic, remote technologies in civil and commercial cases should ensure the necessary level of security while collecting and receiving evidence. Unlike the procedural legislation of Ukraine and the practice of its application, a decentralized IT system is used to collect and receive evidence in civil and commercial cases in the European Union to simplify and increase the efficiency of judicial processes, as well as to ensure greater legal certainty.
Non-Governmental Organization "Civil Law Platform"
Title: Submission and Taking of Evidence: Practice of the European union
Description:
The study's relevance is due to the adaptation of the mechanisms of legal regulation of procedural relations in Ukraine to the law of the European Union.
The study aims to identify the forms and rules for collecting and presenting evidence in civil and commercial cases under the law of the European Union—research methods.
Primary sources were studied in writing the article, including the European Union legislation.
Scientific works of foreign authors devoted to individual aspects of the problem under study were analyzed.
Achieving the outlined goal was made possible through the use of a complex of methods of scientific knowledge, in particular philosophical (Aristotelian), general scientific (descriptive, systemic, comparative, structural-functional), as well as special (developed by non-legal sciences, in particular, the analysis of written legal sources, cybernetic) and individual (developed by legal sciences: formal-dogmatic and special-legal) methods.
The scientific novelty lies in the fact that this article is one of the first comprehensive studies of the features of collecting and presenting evidence in civil and commercial cases in the European Union.
Results.
The features of collecting and presenting evidence in civil and commercial cases according to the rules established in the European Union have been studied.
The need to consider these features in Ukraine's procedural legislation and practice of application has been substantiated.
Conclusions.
The European Union consistently introduces innovative technologies into all spheres of life, as well as the digitalization of economic and judicial processes.
Using electronic, remote technologies in civil and commercial cases should ensure the necessary level of security while collecting and receiving evidence.
Unlike the procedural legislation of Ukraine and the practice of its application, a decentralized IT system is used to collect and receive evidence in civil and commercial cases in the European Union to simplify and increase the efficiency of judicial processes, as well as to ensure greater legal certainty.
Related Results
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Joint Exercise of Sovereign Powers of the Member States of the European Union. The French Approach to Legal Understanding of the European Union
Joint Exercise of Sovereign Powers of the Member States of the European Union. The French Approach to Legal Understanding of the European Union
Introduction. This article analyses the legal nature of the European Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union). The research presented in this article is based on two closely re...
Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practice Competency among Greek Undergraduate Nursing Students
Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practice Competency among Greek Undergraduate Nursing Students
For several years, the global scientific community has accepted and recognized the importance of evidence-based practice for nursing science. The main factor for the implementation...
Soviet Union in World War II
Soviet Union in World War II
The Soviet Union in World War II is the story of several wars. When World War II started, the Soviet Union was effectively an ally of Nazi Germany in a relatively conventional Euro...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Uptake of evidence-based practice and its predictors among nurses in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Uptake of evidence-based practice and its predictors among nurses in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: While evidence-based practice has demonstrated its capacity to enhance healthcare quality and bolster clinical outcomes, the translation of research into clinical pract...
European Economic Integration
European Economic Integration
This book investigates the evolution of the integration process of the European Union (EU) under the lenses of economic development. The process of the European Economic Integratio...

