Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Effect of the Accuracy of Various Measuring Devices on Recorded Joint Kinematics
View through CrossRef
Knowledge of joint kinematics contributes to the understanding of the function of soft tissue restraints, injury mechanisms, and can be used to evaluate surgical repair techniques. (Tibone, McMahon et al. 1998; Karduna, McClure et al. 2001; Abramowitch, Papageorgiou et al. 2003) Previous studies have measured joint kinematics using a variety of non-invasive methods that include: optical tracking, magnetic tracking, and mechanical linkage systems. (Rudins, Laskowski et al. 1997; Apreleva, Hasselman et al. 1998; Gabriel, Wong et al. 2004) These measurement devices report kinematics of rigid bodies with respect their own global coordinate system. However, it is often useful to understand these kinematics in terms of a coordinate system whose axes coincide with the degrees of freedom of each specific joint (anatomical coordinate systems). Once the kinematics are obtained with respect to the global coordinate system of the measurement device, the joint kinematics can be calculated with respect to anatomical coordinate systems if the relationship between the measurement device and the anatomical coordinate systems are known. Although the accuracy of these kinematic measurement devices is provided by the manufacturer, the effect of their accuracy on joint kinematics reported with respect to anatomical coordinate systems must be determined. (Panjabi, Goel et al. 1982; Crisco, Chen et al. 1994) For example, small errors in orientation of the measurement system could lead to large errors in position for an anatomical coordinate system located at some distance away. As researchers report joint kinematics with respect to the anatomical coordinate systems, understanding the errors produced by one’s measurement device with respect to the anatomical coordinate systems is necessary. Further, a great deal of interest exists for studying knee joint kinematics. (Sakane, Livesay et al. 1999; Lephart, Ferris et al. 2002; Ford, Myer et al. 2003) Within our research center our goal is to collect knee joint kinematics of a cadaver and reproduce them with respect to the anatomical coordinate systems using robotic technology. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of the accuracy of three measurement devices (optical tracking device-OptoTrak® 3020, magnetic tracking device-Flock of Birds®, instrumented spatial linkage-EnduraTec Corp.) on knee joint kinematics reported with respect to an anatomical coordinate system.
Title: The Effect of the Accuracy of Various Measuring Devices on Recorded Joint Kinematics
Description:
Knowledge of joint kinematics contributes to the understanding of the function of soft tissue restraints, injury mechanisms, and can be used to evaluate surgical repair techniques.
(Tibone, McMahon et al.
1998; Karduna, McClure et al.
2001; Abramowitch, Papageorgiou et al.
2003) Previous studies have measured joint kinematics using a variety of non-invasive methods that include: optical tracking, magnetic tracking, and mechanical linkage systems.
(Rudins, Laskowski et al.
1997; Apreleva, Hasselman et al.
1998; Gabriel, Wong et al.
2004) These measurement devices report kinematics of rigid bodies with respect their own global coordinate system.
However, it is often useful to understand these kinematics in terms of a coordinate system whose axes coincide with the degrees of freedom of each specific joint (anatomical coordinate systems).
Once the kinematics are obtained with respect to the global coordinate system of the measurement device, the joint kinematics can be calculated with respect to anatomical coordinate systems if the relationship between the measurement device and the anatomical coordinate systems are known.
Although the accuracy of these kinematic measurement devices is provided by the manufacturer, the effect of their accuracy on joint kinematics reported with respect to anatomical coordinate systems must be determined.
(Panjabi, Goel et al.
1982; Crisco, Chen et al.
1994) For example, small errors in orientation of the measurement system could lead to large errors in position for an anatomical coordinate system located at some distance away.
As researchers report joint kinematics with respect to the anatomical coordinate systems, understanding the errors produced by one’s measurement device with respect to the anatomical coordinate systems is necessary.
Further, a great deal of interest exists for studying knee joint kinematics.
(Sakane, Livesay et al.
1999; Lephart, Ferris et al.
2002; Ford, Myer et al.
2003) Within our research center our goal is to collect knee joint kinematics of a cadaver and reproduce them with respect to the anatomical coordinate systems using robotic technology.
Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of the accuracy of three measurement devices (optical tracking device-OptoTrak® 3020, magnetic tracking device-Flock of Birds®, instrumented spatial linkage-EnduraTec Corp.
) on knee joint kinematics reported with respect to an anatomical coordinate system.
Related Results
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Differential Diagnosis of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review
Abstract
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a complex and often overlooked condition caused by the compression of neurovascular structures as they pass through the thoracic outlet. ...
Quality of measuring devices enclosed with paediatric oral liquid dosage forms of medicines registered in Sri Lanka
Quality of measuring devices enclosed with paediatric oral liquid dosage forms of medicines registered in Sri Lanka
Introduction
Oral liquid dosage forms remain popular in several middle income countries. The accuracy of liquid dosage form dosing depends on the accuracy and availability of measu...
Angular kinematics analysis of the Final Release position of elite Archers
Angular kinematics analysis of the Final Release position of elite Archers
The purpose of the study was Angular kinematics analysis of an Elite archers. In present study total sample five Indian International level male Recurve category Archers was select...
Discovering optimal flapping wing kinematics using active deep learning
Discovering optimal flapping wing kinematics using active deep learning
This paper focuses on the discovery of optimal flapping wing kinematics using a deep learning surrogate model for unsteady aerodynamics and multi-objective optimisation. First, a s...
Improved Wave Kinematics From Wave Staff Arrays
Improved Wave Kinematics From Wave Staff Arrays
ABSTRACT
A method is described for improved prediction of wave kinematics from wave staff array records. This new procedure assigns directions, as well as amplitu...
Generalized Kinematics Analysis of Hybrid Mechanisms Based on Screw Theory and Lie Groups Lie Algebras
Generalized Kinematics Analysis of Hybrid Mechanisms Based on Screw Theory and Lie Groups Lie Algebras
Abstract
The advanced mathematical tools are used to conduct research on the kinematics analysis of hybrid mechanisms, and the generalized analysis method and concise kinem...
NON-HEADER IMPACT EXPOSURE AND KINEMATICS OF MALE YOUTH SOCCER PLAYERS
NON-HEADER IMPACT EXPOSURE AND KINEMATICS OF MALE YOUTH SOCCER PLAYERS
Previous studies have investigated the head impact kinematics of purposeful heading in youth soccer; however, less than a third of all head injuries in youth soccer have been foun...
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN PLANTAR PRESSURE AND JOINT KINEMATICS IN FEMALE RECREATIONAL RUNNERS
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN PLANTAR PRESSURE AND JOINT KINEMATICS IN FEMALE RECREATIONAL RUNNERS
performed simultaneous assessments of plantar pressure and joint kinematics; however, they have not investigated correlations between these parameters. The goal of this study was t...

