Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Membrane Sweeping for Induction of Labour
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackground: Sweeping of the membranes, also named stripping of the membranes, is a relatively simple technique usually performed without admission to hospital. During vaginal examination, the clinician's finger is introduced into the cervical os. Then, the inferior pole of the membranes is detached from the lower uterine segment by a circular movement of the examining finger. This intervention has the potential to initiate labour by increasing local production of prostaglandins and, thus, reduce pregnancy duration or pre‐empt formal induction of labour with either oxytocin, prostaglandins, or amniotomy. This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using tandardized methodology.Objectives: To determine the effects of membrane sweeping for third trimester induction of labour.Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (6 July 2004) and bibliographies of relevant papers.Selection criteria: Clinical trials comparing membrane sweeping used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other methods listed above it on a predefined list of labour induction methods.Data collection and analysis: A strategy was developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of trial data relating to labour induction. This involved a two‐stage method of data extraction.Main results: Twenty‐two trials (2797 women) were included, 20 comparing sweeping of membranes with no treatment, three comparing sweeping with prostaglandins. And one comparing sweeping with oxytocin (two studies reported more than one comparison). Risk of caesarean section was similar between groups (relative risk (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.15). Sweeping of the membranes, performed as a general policy in women at term, was associated with reduced duration of pregnancy and reduced frequency of pregnancy continuing beyond 41 weeks (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74) and 42 weeks (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.50). To avoid one formal induction of labour, sweeping of membranes must be performed in eight women (NNT = 8). There was no evidence of a difference in the risk of maternal or neonatal infection. Discomfort during vaginal examination and other adverse effects (bleeding, irregular contractions) were more frequently reported by women allocated to sweeping. Studies comparing sweeping with prostaglandin administration are of limited sample size and do not provide evidence of benefit.Authors’ conclusions: Routine use of sweeping of membranes from 38 weeks of pregnancy onwards does not seem to produce clinically important benefits. When used as a means for induction of labour, the reduction in the use of more formal methods of induction needs to be balanced against women's discomfort and other adverse effects.Citation: Boulvain M, Stan C, Irion O. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000451.pub2. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub2.• • • The preceding reports are abstracts of regularly updated, systematic reviews prepared and maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration. The full text of the reviews is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464‐780X). Abstracts of Cochrane reviews are compiled and produced by Update Software Ltd on behalf of the publisher, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Title: Membrane Sweeping for Induction of Labour
Description:
AbstractBackground: Sweeping of the membranes, also named stripping of the membranes, is a relatively simple technique usually performed without admission to hospital.
During vaginal examination, the clinician's finger is introduced into the cervical os.
Then, the inferior pole of the membranes is detached from the lower uterine segment by a circular movement of the examining finger.
This intervention has the potential to initiate labour by increasing local production of prostaglandins and, thus, reduce pregnancy duration or pre‐empt formal induction of labour with either oxytocin, prostaglandins, or amniotomy.
This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using tandardized methodology.
Objectives: To determine the effects of membrane sweeping for third trimester induction of labour.
Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (6 July 2004) and bibliographies of relevant papers.
Selection criteria: Clinical trials comparing membrane sweeping used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other methods listed above it on a predefined list of labour induction methods.
Data collection and analysis: A strategy was developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of trial data relating to labour induction.
This involved a two‐stage method of data extraction.
Main results: Twenty‐two trials (2797 women) were included, 20 comparing sweeping of membranes with no treatment, three comparing sweeping with prostaglandins.
And one comparing sweeping with oxytocin (two studies reported more than one comparison).
Risk of caesarean section was similar between groups (relative risk (RR) 0.
90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.
70 to 1.
15).
Sweeping of the membranes, performed as a general policy in women at term, was associated with reduced duration of pregnancy and reduced frequency of pregnancy continuing beyond 41 weeks (RR 0.
59, 95% CI 0.
46 to 0.
74) and 42 weeks (RR 0.
28, 95% CI 0.
15 to 0.
50).
To avoid one formal induction of labour, sweeping of membranes must be performed in eight women (NNT = 8).
There was no evidence of a difference in the risk of maternal or neonatal infection.
Discomfort during vaginal examination and other adverse effects (bleeding, irregular contractions) were more frequently reported by women allocated to sweeping.
Studies comparing sweeping with prostaglandin administration are of limited sample size and do not provide evidence of benefit.
Authors’ conclusions: Routine use of sweeping of membranes from 38 weeks of pregnancy onwards does not seem to produce clinically important benefits.
When used as a means for induction of labour, the reduction in the use of more formal methods of induction needs to be balanced against women's discomfort and other adverse effects.
Citation: Boulvain M, Stan C, Irion O.
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 1.
Art.
No.
: CD000451.
pub2.
DOI: 10.
1002/14651858.
CD000451.
pub2.
• • • The preceding reports are abstracts of regularly updated, systematic reviews prepared and maintained by the Cochrane Collaboration.
The full text of the reviews is available in The Cochrane Library (ISSN 1464‐780X).
Abstracts of Cochrane reviews are compiled and produced by Update Software Ltd on behalf of the publisher, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Related Results
Procedure for Western blot v1
Procedure for Western blot v1
Goal: This document has the objective of standardizing the protocol for Western blot. This technique allows the detection of specific proteins separated on polyacrylamide gel and t...
MEMBRANES SWEEPING AND ITS EFFECT ON DURATION OF PREGNANCY IN LOW-RISK CASES
MEMBRANES SWEEPING AND ITS EFFECT ON DURATION OF PREGNANCY IN LOW-RISK CASES
Background: Membrane sweeping is a common obstetric intervention used to stimulate labor and decrease the duration of pregnancy. In spite of their widespread use, its efficacy in l...
ISSUES OF PROVIDING GUARANTEES AND SOCIAL PROTECTION FOR EAEU LABOUR MIGRANTS
ISSUES OF PROVIDING GUARANTEES AND SOCIAL PROTECTION FOR EAEU LABOUR MIGRANTS
Background: Today, the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter the EAEU) has formed its own
labour market; however, in the current international environment, issues related to ensurin...
Indications for Induction of Labour: A Prospective Analysis
Indications for Induction of Labour: A Prospective Analysis
Setting: Department of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, B P Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. Objective: The study was conducted to find out the different indicatio...
Changing Scenario of Indian Labour and New Labour Codes: A Critical Analysis
Changing Scenario of Indian Labour and New Labour Codes: A Critical Analysis
The penetrating debate on Indian labour laws obstructing the flexibility of the labour market has taken centre stage in the last two decades, post the period of liberalisation of t...
Proton Polymer Electrolytes in Fuel Cell
Proton Polymer Electrolytes in Fuel Cell
The electrolyte is one of the main parts of a fuel cell. That is divided into liquid and solid and it is used in both Alkaline and acidulous PH. But with due to kind of electrolyte...
Failed induction of labor and associated factors in Adama Hospital Medical College, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia
Failed induction of labor and associated factors in Adama Hospital Medical College, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia
Background: Failed induction of labor continues to be a public health challenge throughout the world. This failed induction of labor is associated with a higher rate of maternal an...
Ten Years of the Global Labour Journal: Reflecting on the Rise of the New Global Labour Studies
Ten Years of the Global Labour Journal: Reflecting on the Rise of the New Global Labour Studies
The article examines the origins of the Global Labour Journal (GLJ) and its goal of broadening labour studies. It shows how, over the past decade, the GLJ has recorded and analysed...

