Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Review of Open Educational Resources in the Geosciences: Guidelines and Criteria

View through CrossRef
Open Educational Resources (OER) offer a link between new trends in learning and instruction, and the promise of transparency and inclusion offered by open science practices. Open textbooks, virtual field and laboratory experiences, interactive computational environments, and openly licensed media are among the many types of OER in use today. Adoption of subject-specific OER has the potential to replace expensive textbooks with free alternatives that can be adapted and reused. While globally, instructors in all scientific disciplines are becoming familiar with OER, geoscientists in particular have been slow to utilize these resources.This study examines the creation and adoption of OER in the geosciences with a goal of providing guidance for institutions, libraries and librarians who support and fund OER initiatives. Beginning with a review of student and faculty perceptions and awareness regarding OER, the study expands to consider OER availability in STEM overall. Furthermore, the creation and adoption of OER in geosciences is discussed. An environmental scan, employed to identify and characterize available college-level OER in this discipline, provided a baseline for the study. Analysis of the scan along with a review of OER, textbook and field guide standards informs a new set of proposed guidelines for geoscience OER. This work will describe these guidelines and offer a call for community feedback.Several of the guidelines are applicable to STEM fields in general, but we also propose specific aspirational criteria unique to geoscience instructional settings. The study is a starting point for authors and adopters to create OER that are discoverable, accessible, authoritative, shareable and sustainable. OER also double as research objects, offering an entry point into understanding student engagement and providing a path to welcome and include a diverse set of students into the study of geoscience.
Title: A Review of Open Educational Resources in the Geosciences: Guidelines and Criteria
Description:
Open Educational Resources (OER) offer a link between new trends in learning and instruction, and the promise of transparency and inclusion offered by open science practices.
Open textbooks, virtual field and laboratory experiences, interactive computational environments, and openly licensed media are among the many types of OER in use today.
Adoption of subject-specific OER has the potential to replace expensive textbooks with free alternatives that can be adapted and reused.
While globally, instructors in all scientific disciplines are becoming familiar with OER, geoscientists in particular have been slow to utilize these resources.
This study examines the creation and adoption of OER in the geosciences with a goal of providing guidance for institutions, libraries and librarians who support and fund OER initiatives.
Beginning with a review of student and faculty perceptions and awareness regarding OER, the study expands to consider OER availability in STEM overall.
Furthermore, the creation and adoption of OER in geosciences is discussed.
An environmental scan, employed to identify and characterize available college-level OER in this discipline, provided a baseline for the study.
Analysis of the scan along with a review of OER, textbook and field guide standards informs a new set of proposed guidelines for geoscience OER.
This work will describe these guidelines and offer a call for community feedback.
Several of the guidelines are applicable to STEM fields in general, but we also propose specific aspirational criteria unique to geoscience instructional settings.
The study is a starting point for authors and adopters to create OER that are discoverable, accessible, authoritative, shareable and sustainable.
OER also double as research objects, offering an entry point into understanding student engagement and providing a path to welcome and include a diverse set of students into the study of geoscience.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review
Evaluation of guidelines on the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review
Objective Guidelines for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been updated in the past several years, and various inconsistencies...
Quality Guidelines for Corona Virus Disease 2019 with AGREE II Instrument.
Quality Guidelines for Corona Virus Disease 2019 with AGREE II Instrument.
Objective: Numerous clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been developed since its outbreak. To date, however, the methodological qu...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...

Back to Top