Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Tocqueville and Marx: Not opposites

View through CrossRef
Ever since scholars rediscovered Tocqueville after World War II, they have generally viewed him in contrast to Marx, for some a liberal and pluralist answer to Marxist tyranny. Writing at approximately the same time, diagnosing the social and political ills of the mid-nineteenth century, and predicting the future, Tocqueville and Marx appear as contrasts, because both their analyses and their conclusions are usually different. Nonetheless, there are significant similarities between Tocqueville and Marx including their predictions of an irresistible historical march toward equality, their uses of class analyses, and their hopes for some new kind of association – they use the same word – to save humankind from a new tyranny.
Title: Tocqueville and Marx: Not opposites
Description:
Ever since scholars rediscovered Tocqueville after World War II, they have generally viewed him in contrast to Marx, for some a liberal and pluralist answer to Marxist tyranny.
Writing at approximately the same time, diagnosing the social and political ills of the mid-nineteenth century, and predicting the future, Tocqueville and Marx appear as contrasts, because both their analyses and their conclusions are usually different.
Nonetheless, there are significant similarities between Tocqueville and Marx including their predictions of an irresistible historical march toward equality, their uses of class analyses, and their hopes for some new kind of association – they use the same word – to save humankind from a new tyranny.

Related Results

Alexis de Tocqueville and the Art of Democratic Statesmanship
Alexis de Tocqueville and the Art of Democratic Statesmanship
In 1835, Alexis de Tocqueville famously called for 'a new political science' that could address the problems and possibilities of a 'world itself quite new.' For Tocqueville, the d...
Interview with David McLellan July 2018
Interview with David McLellan July 2018
David McLellan, interviewed here, is a Fellow of Goldsmiths College, University of London and Emeritus Professor of Political Theory, University of Kent. Since the 1970s he has bee...
Tocqueville et Beaumont sur la réforme des criminels
Tocqueville et Beaumont sur la réforme des criminels
Le 10 mai 1831, Alexis de Tocqueville et Gustave de Beaumont débarquaient dans le port de New York. Ils resteront aux États-Unis jusqu’au 20 février 1832. De ce séjour de neuf mois...
Reforming Tocqueville
Reforming Tocqueville
“Tocqueville,” wrote Lynn L. Marshall and Seymour Drescher in 1968, “enjoys such vogue among current American historians of the [antebellum] period that a proposal to analyze his u...
Reforming Tocqueville
Reforming Tocqueville
“Tocqueville,” wrote Lynn L. Marshall and Seymour Drescher in 1968, “enjoys such vogue among current American historians of the [antebellum] period that a proposal to analyze his u...
¿Por qué leer a Marx hoy?
¿Por qué leer a Marx hoy?
¿Y por qué no habría de leerlo? En el caso particular de Marx, ha habido a lo largo del tiempo, y hay aún, tanto discurso anti-Marx y también antimarxista que, entre todos los auto...
Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx
Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx
Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx: On Totalitarianism and the Tradition of Western Political Thought is the first book to examine Hannah Arendt’s unpublished writings on Marx in their to...
Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.
Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.
AbstractAndrew Kliman’s Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’ sets out to refute the ‘myth’ that Marx’s original presentation of the theory of the value is internally inconsistent. A century...

Back to Top