Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Dividend policy in Indonesia: survey evidence from executives

View through CrossRef
PurposeThis study aims to survey managers of dividend‐paying firms listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) to learn their views about the factors influencing dividend policy, dividend issues, and explanations for paying dividends. The study also aims to focus on Indonesia, the largest national economy in Southeast Asia, because relatively few studies examine why Indonesian firms pay dividends.Design/methodology/approachThe primary means of gathering data is a mail survey. The two‐page survey instrument consists of three main sections: 22 factors for determining a firm's dividend policy; six questions that provide background information about the respondents and their firms; and 27 statements about dividend policy in general. Of the 163 firms surveyed, 52 firms responded, resulting in a response rate of 31.9 per cent.FindingsThe evidence shows that managers view the most important determinants of dividends as the stability of earnings and the level of current and expected future earnings. They also believe that the effects of dividends on stock prices and needs of current shareholders are important determinants. The evidence shows that managers of Indonesian firms perceive that dividend policy affects firm value. Managers seem to agree that multiple theories including signaling, catering, and life cycle explanations help to explain why their firms pay dividends.Research limitations/implicationsThe study focuses on a limited number of factors and issues involving dividend policy. While non‐response bias could potentially limit making generalizations to the population of IDX firms, statistical tests show no significant differences between respondents and non‐respondents on various firm characteristics.Practical implicationsThe evidence suggests that no universal set of factors is likely to be applicable to all firms when setting dividend policy.Originality/valueThis study presents new evidence on the perceptions of managers of dividend‐paying IDX‐listed firms about the factors influencing dividend policy, dividend issues, and explanations for paying dividends.
Title: Dividend policy in Indonesia: survey evidence from executives
Description:
PurposeThis study aims to survey managers of dividend‐paying firms listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) to learn their views about the factors influencing dividend policy, dividend issues, and explanations for paying dividends.
The study also aims to focus on Indonesia, the largest national economy in Southeast Asia, because relatively few studies examine why Indonesian firms pay dividends.
Design/methodology/approachThe primary means of gathering data is a mail survey.
The two‐page survey instrument consists of three main sections: 22 factors for determining a firm's dividend policy; six questions that provide background information about the respondents and their firms; and 27 statements about dividend policy in general.
Of the 163 firms surveyed, 52 firms responded, resulting in a response rate of 31.
9 per cent.
FindingsThe evidence shows that managers view the most important determinants of dividends as the stability of earnings and the level of current and expected future earnings.
They also believe that the effects of dividends on stock prices and needs of current shareholders are important determinants.
The evidence shows that managers of Indonesian firms perceive that dividend policy affects firm value.
Managers seem to agree that multiple theories including signaling, catering, and life cycle explanations help to explain why their firms pay dividends.
Research limitations/implicationsThe study focuses on a limited number of factors and issues involving dividend policy.
While non‐response bias could potentially limit making generalizations to the population of IDX firms, statistical tests show no significant differences between respondents and non‐respondents on various firm characteristics.
Practical implicationsThe evidence suggests that no universal set of factors is likely to be applicable to all firms when setting dividend policy.
Originality/valueThis study presents new evidence on the perceptions of managers of dividend‐paying IDX‐listed firms about the factors influencing dividend policy, dividend issues, and explanations for paying dividends.

Related Results

Do discretionary accruals affect firms’ corporate dividend policy? Evidence from France
Do discretionary accruals affect firms’ corporate dividend policy? Evidence from France
Purpose In financial literature, dividend payout decisions are determined by factors such as debt, liquidity, profitability, size and risk. The purpose of this paper is to identify...
IMPACT OF DIVIDEND POLICY ON STOCK PRICES BEFORE AND AFTER CAPITAL GAIN TAX IMPOSITION: THE CASE OF MANUFACTURING SECTOR OF PAKISTAN
IMPACT OF DIVIDEND POLICY ON STOCK PRICES BEFORE AND AFTER CAPITAL GAIN TAX IMPOSITION: THE CASE OF MANUFACTURING SECTOR OF PAKISTAN
The aim of the study is to find the impact of dividend policy on stock prices before the capital gains tax imposition (2006-2010) and after the capital gains tax imposition (2011-2...
Corporate Governance and Dividend payout Policy: Mediating Role of Leverage. Evidence from Emerging Economy
Corporate Governance and Dividend payout Policy: Mediating Role of Leverage. Evidence from Emerging Economy
This study seeks to explore the relationship between corporate governance and dividend payout policy Mediating role of leverage between corporate governance and dividend payout in ...
Dividend policy in India: reconciling theory and evidence
Dividend policy in India: reconciling theory and evidence
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the dividend payout behavior of Indian firms and test whether the three prominent dividend policy theories (signaling, life-cycle and...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Characteristics identifying the companies conducting different dividend policy: evidence from Poland
Characteristics identifying the companies conducting different dividend policy: evidence from Poland
Research background: Dividend policy has been a subject of many scientific studies. Although most of them focus on its determinants, there is still a research gap concerning the la...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
How accurate are A-REIT IPO dividend forecasts?
How accurate are A-REIT IPO dividend forecasts?
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the accuracy of Australian Real Estate Investment Trust (A-REIT) initial public offering (IPO) dividend forecasts between 1994 a...

Back to Top