Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Canadian corporate payout policy

View through CrossRef
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine cash dividends and stock repurchases in Canada from 1988 to 2006 and their relationship with earnings.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses logistic regressions to examine the likelihood of paying dividends and the timing of repurchases and OLS regressions to examine the level of payout.FindingsThe fraction of dividend‐paying firms declines from 1988 to 2001 and then slightly rebounds until the end of the sample period in 2006. Firm size, profitability, investment opportunities, and catering incentives explain the likelihood of paying dividends. Unlike US firms, Canadian repurchase‐only firms do not become important payers in terms of either the percentage of firms or the level of payout. Dividend‐only firms pay out significant amounts of cash. Firms with both regular dividends and regular repurchases pay out the largest amount. The payout of different groups of payers is determined by their earnings. Testing firms with both regular dividends and regular repurchases reveals that earnings, undervaluation, and availability of cash explains the timing of repurchases but earnings mainly explains the level of repurchases.Research limitations/implicationsCanadian data are unavailable after 2006, which precludes investigating the potential implications of the financial crisis beginning in 2007.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to analyze the evolution of the relationship between payout and earnings in Canada.
Title: Canadian corporate payout policy
Description:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine cash dividends and stock repurchases in Canada from 1988 to 2006 and their relationship with earnings.
Design/methodology/approachThe study uses logistic regressions to examine the likelihood of paying dividends and the timing of repurchases and OLS regressions to examine the level of payout.
FindingsThe fraction of dividend‐paying firms declines from 1988 to 2001 and then slightly rebounds until the end of the sample period in 2006.
Firm size, profitability, investment opportunities, and catering incentives explain the likelihood of paying dividends.
Unlike US firms, Canadian repurchase‐only firms do not become important payers in terms of either the percentage of firms or the level of payout.
Dividend‐only firms pay out significant amounts of cash.
Firms with both regular dividends and regular repurchases pay out the largest amount.
The payout of different groups of payers is determined by their earnings.
Testing firms with both regular dividends and regular repurchases reveals that earnings, undervaluation, and availability of cash explains the timing of repurchases but earnings mainly explains the level of repurchases.
Research limitations/implicationsCanadian data are unavailable after 2006, which precludes investigating the potential implications of the financial crisis beginning in 2007.
Originality/valueThis is the first paper to analyze the evolution of the relationship between payout and earnings in Canada.

Related Results

Profitaility and Dividend Payout Among Construction Companies Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange
Profitaility and Dividend Payout Among Construction Companies Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange
  Being one of the major drivers for investing in stocks, dividend payment has been center of interest among stakeholders mainly investors, management and academic fraternity has ...
Corporate Governance and Dividend payout Policy: Mediating Role of Leverage. Evidence from Emerging Economy
Corporate Governance and Dividend payout Policy: Mediating Role of Leverage. Evidence from Emerging Economy
This study seeks to explore the relationship between corporate governance and dividend payout policy Mediating role of leverage between corporate governance and dividend payout in ...
Corporate heritage, corporate heritage marketing, and total corporate heritage communications
Corporate heritage, corporate heritage marketing, and total corporate heritage communications
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to advance the general understanding of the corporate heritage domain. The paper seeks to specify the requisites of corporate heritage and to in...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
A Impact of Firm’s Internal Factors on Payout Policy: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Pakistan
A Impact of Firm’s Internal Factors on Payout Policy: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Pakistan
The main motive of this research is to explore the link between the internal factors of the firms which affect the payout policy. The study conducted on a comparative basis, where ...
ANALISIS GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN
ANALISIS GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN
AbstractHigh corporate value becomes the desire of the owners of the company, because with a high value indicates the high prosperity of the shareholders, and they will invest capi...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...

Back to Top