Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparing Spinopelvic Angles and Magnification on Supine MRI With Standing Radiographs in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
View through CrossRef
Study Design:
Radiologic cross-sectional study based on a prospective cohort study (level III).
Objective:
Investigate whether lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) differ significantly on supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus standing radiographs in nondeformity lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Secondly, to quantify the amount of magnification on standing lumbar radiographs.
Summary of Background Data:
Supine MRI is routinely performed when diagnosing LSS. Standing radiographs are often supplemented to measure spinopelvic angles. Little research has been done on whether LL and SS translate from standing radiographs to supine MRI. Previous studies have trended to significant changes in LL and SS; however, none have been performed exclusively in nondeformity LSS.
Materials and Methods:
Review of preoperative standing lateral lumbar radiographs and midsagittal T2-weighted supine lumbar MRI in 211 patients with LSS without concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis, measuring LL (L1–S1), segmental lumbar lordosis (sLL) (L4–S1) and SS, in addition to the anteroposterior diameter and height of the L3 vertebral body. We conducted a reliability study and performed a Pearson’s correlation analysis. Data was presented in Bland-Altman plots.
Results:
Interobserver reliability was good to excellent, with ICC ranging from 0.77 to 0.94 for all parameters. Statistically significant differences were observed in LL and SS between image modalities. The mean radiographic measurements were as follows: LL 48.9 (SD: 12.8), sLL 32.3 (SD: 8.1), and SS 37.3 (SD: 8.7) degrees. The mean MRI measurements were as follows: LL 46.0 (SD: 10.5), sLL 32.3 (SD: 7.1), and SS 38.1 (SD: 7.1) degrees. Mean vertebral body magnification was between 21% and 23% for L3 anteroposterior diameter and height.
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that supine lumbar MRI might be a viable alternative to standing lateral lumbar radiographs for measuring LL and SS in routine follow-up for patients with LSS without concomitant spinal deformity. Standing radiographs are recommended as part of the initial investigation for LSS. Standing lumbar radiographs may yield high grades of magnification.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Comparing Spinopelvic Angles and Magnification on Supine MRI With Standing Radiographs in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Description:
Study Design:
Radiologic cross-sectional study based on a prospective cohort study (level III).
Objective:
Investigate whether lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) differ significantly on supine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus standing radiographs in nondeformity lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
Secondly, to quantify the amount of magnification on standing lumbar radiographs.
Summary of Background Data:
Supine MRI is routinely performed when diagnosing LSS.
Standing radiographs are often supplemented to measure spinopelvic angles.
Little research has been done on whether LL and SS translate from standing radiographs to supine MRI.
Previous studies have trended to significant changes in LL and SS; however, none have been performed exclusively in nondeformity LSS.
Materials and Methods:
Review of preoperative standing lateral lumbar radiographs and midsagittal T2-weighted supine lumbar MRI in 211 patients with LSS without concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis, measuring LL (L1–S1), segmental lumbar lordosis (sLL) (L4–S1) and SS, in addition to the anteroposterior diameter and height of the L3 vertebral body.
We conducted a reliability study and performed a Pearson’s correlation analysis.
Data was presented in Bland-Altman plots.
Results:
Interobserver reliability was good to excellent, with ICC ranging from 0.
77 to 0.
94 for all parameters.
Statistically significant differences were observed in LL and SS between image modalities.
The mean radiographic measurements were as follows: LL 48.
9 (SD: 12.
8), sLL 32.
3 (SD: 8.
1), and SS 37.
3 (SD: 8.
7) degrees.
The mean MRI measurements were as follows: LL 46.
0 (SD: 10.
5), sLL 32.
3 (SD: 7.
1), and SS 38.
1 (SD: 7.
1) degrees.
Mean vertebral body magnification was between 21% and 23% for L3 anteroposterior diameter and height.
Conclusions:
Our results suggest that supine lumbar MRI might be a viable alternative to standing lateral lumbar radiographs for measuring LL and SS in routine follow-up for patients with LSS without concomitant spinal deformity.
Standing radiographs are recommended as part of the initial investigation for LSS.
Standing lumbar radiographs may yield high grades of magnification.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Radiological Analysis of Sagittal and Cross-sectional Morphology of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Radiological Analysis of Sagittal and Cross-sectional Morphology of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Abstract
Background Purpose This retrospective study was applied to investigate the morphology characteristics of the spine and pelvis in patients with congenital spinal s...
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Background Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common causes of low back and leg pain. Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration leads to the decrease of intervertebral height, the ...
Are traditional spinopelvic risk factors relevant for young adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty?
Are traditional spinopelvic risk factors relevant for young adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty?
Abstract
Purpose
Traditional spinopelvic risk factors, including lumbar stiffness, sagittal imbalance and standing poster...
PAC System for Radiographic Comparison of Standing and Supine Lateral Views in Patients with Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis
PAC System for Radiographic Comparison of Standing and Supine Lateral Views in Patients with Low-Grade Spondylolisthesis
Objective: Supine views may not adequately depict low-degree spondylolisthesis, thereby confusing surgeons in deciding the best therapy plan. The study aimed to compare the standi...
Radiographic Assessment of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment and Coccygeal Morphology and Mobility in Sitting and Standing Positions in Coccydynia
Radiographic Assessment of Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment and Coccygeal Morphology and Mobility in Sitting and Standing Positions in Coccydynia
Abstract
Purpose
Coccygeal morphology has been described in coccydynia, but dynamic assessments have been limited to standing o...
Revealing the Effect of Spinopelvic Alignment on Hip Disorders
Revealing the Effect of Spinopelvic Alignment on Hip Disorders
Background:
Hip osteoarthritis (HOA) is a growing burden and one of the leading causes of hip pain. The relationship between the HOA and the alignment of the sp...
Critical Arterial Stenosis Revisited
Critical Arterial Stenosis Revisited
Abstract
Introduction
Stenosis of an organ/tissue primary artery can produce ischemia or only reduce blood flow reserve. Despit...

