Javascript must be enabled to continue!
White-Tailed Deer
View through CrossRef
Abstract
White-tailed deer are geographically widespread and occupy a variety of ecosystems from semi-desert shrubland and grasslands to forests. They have a relatively high reproductive potential but recruitment may be limited in semiarid rangelands where annual variation in precipitation is high. They eat browse and forbs but mast may seasonally comprise most of the diet. White-tailed deer select areas with a mixture of woody vegetation and areas dominated by herbaceous vegetation. They use woody vegetation for cover and often forage in adjacent herbaceous-dominated areas. They are highly adaptable and can adjust to changes in vegetation resulting from rangeland management practices; however, excessive grazing reduces habitat quality. Brush management minimally affects white-tailed deer and their habitat when adequate resources such as thermal cover, hiding cover, and browse-and-mast-producing vegetation remain on the landscape. Empirical evidence that creating mosaics of herbaceous-dominated foraging patches and woody cover improves demographics or productivity is equivocal; however, managing for increased spatial heterogeneity in vegetation may increase fawn survival. Chronic wasting disease is a major threat to white-tailed deer populations. White-tailed deer use behavioral adaptations to reduce excessive heat loads resulting from climate change in the southern part of their range. Paradoxically, populations are expanding in the northern part of their range in part because of milder winters. Hunting is the primary tool to manage white-tailed deer populations. Combining recreational hunting with livestock production increases revenue for ranchers. Ironically, white-tailed deer are often a nuisance in eastern forests, but they can be an economically important asset on rangelands.
Springer International Publishing
Title: White-Tailed Deer
Description:
Abstract
White-tailed deer are geographically widespread and occupy a variety of ecosystems from semi-desert shrubland and grasslands to forests.
They have a relatively high reproductive potential but recruitment may be limited in semiarid rangelands where annual variation in precipitation is high.
They eat browse and forbs but mast may seasonally comprise most of the diet.
White-tailed deer select areas with a mixture of woody vegetation and areas dominated by herbaceous vegetation.
They use woody vegetation for cover and often forage in adjacent herbaceous-dominated areas.
They are highly adaptable and can adjust to changes in vegetation resulting from rangeland management practices; however, excessive grazing reduces habitat quality.
Brush management minimally affects white-tailed deer and their habitat when adequate resources such as thermal cover, hiding cover, and browse-and-mast-producing vegetation remain on the landscape.
Empirical evidence that creating mosaics of herbaceous-dominated foraging patches and woody cover improves demographics or productivity is equivocal; however, managing for increased spatial heterogeneity in vegetation may increase fawn survival.
Chronic wasting disease is a major threat to white-tailed deer populations.
White-tailed deer use behavioral adaptations to reduce excessive heat loads resulting from climate change in the southern part of their range.
Paradoxically, populations are expanding in the northern part of their range in part because of milder winters.
Hunting is the primary tool to manage white-tailed deer populations.
Combining recreational hunting with livestock production increases revenue for ranchers.
Ironically, white-tailed deer are often a nuisance in eastern forests, but they can be an economically important asset on rangelands.
Related Results
Linking White‐Tailed Deer Density, Nutrition, and Vegetation in a Stochastic Environment
Linking White‐Tailed Deer Density, Nutrition, and Vegetation in a Stochastic Environment
ABSTRACT
Density‐dependent behavior underpins white‐tailed deer (
Odocoileus virginianus
) theory and...
Ecological Relationships between Mule Deer and White‐Tailed Deer in Southeastern Arizona
Ecological Relationships between Mule Deer and White‐Tailed Deer in Southeastern Arizona
Niche relationships between the desert mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus crooki) and Coues white—tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus couesi) were studied in the San Cayetano and Dos C...
Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia Species of Sympatric Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus), Fallow Deer (Dama dama), Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) and Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) in Germany
Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia Species of Sympatric Roe Deer (Capreolus capreolus), Fallow Deer (Dama dama), Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) and Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) in Germany
(1) Background: Wild cervids play an important role in transmission cycles of tick-borne pathogens; however, investigations of tick-borne pathogens in sika deer in Germany are lack...
Comparing habitat quality within and between environments using giving up densities: an example based on the winter habitat of white‐tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus
Comparing habitat quality within and between environments using giving up densities: an example based on the winter habitat of white‐tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus
We previously developed a model, based on the precepts of optimal patch use, to compare habitat quality both within and between environments. Here we illustrate the use of this mod...
Development of a tetra-primer ARMS–PCR for identification of sika and red deer and their hybrids
Development of a tetra-primer ARMS–PCR for identification of sika and red deer and their hybrids
AbstractAccurate identification of deer-derived components is significant in food and drug authenticity. Over the years, several methods have been developed to authenticate these p...
Seasonal and annual fluctuations of deer populations estimated by a Bayesian state–space model
Seasonal and annual fluctuations of deer populations estimated by a Bayesian state–space model
Abstract
Deer overabundance is a contributing factor in the degradation of plant communities and ecosystems worldwide. The management and conserv...
Deer slow down litter decomposition by reducing litter quality in a temperate forest
Deer slow down litter decomposition by reducing litter quality in a temperate forest
ABSTRACTIn temperate forest ecosystems, the role of deer in litter decomposition, a key nutrient cycling process, remains debated. Deer may modify the decomposition process by affe...
Impact of the conflict interactions and social learning on the hierarchy structure in captive males of Moschus chrysogaster (Moschidae)
Impact of the conflict interactions and social learning on the hierarchy structure in captive males of Moschus chrysogaster (Moschidae)
Moschus chrysogaster (hereafter – musk deer) is an endemic to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and surrounding areas in China. Due to historical overutilisation and habitat degradation an...

