Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Estimating the CCSD basis-set limit energy from small basis sets: basis-set extrapolations vs additivity schemes
View through CrossRef
Coupled cluster calculations with all single and double excitations (CCSD) converge exceedingly slowly with the size of the one-particle basis set. We assess the performance of a number of approaches for obtaining CCSD correlation energies close to the complete basis-set limit in conjunction with relatively small DZ and TZ basis sets. These include global and system-dependent extrapolations based on the A + B/Lα two-point extrapolation formula, and the well-known additivity approach that uses an MP2-based basis-set-correction term. We show that the basis set convergence rate can change dramatically between different systems(e.g.it is slower for molecules with polar bonds and/or second-row elements). The system-dependent basis-set extrapolation scheme, in which unique basis-set extrapolation exponents for each system are obtained from lower-cost MP2 calculations, significantly accelerates the basis-set convergence relative to the global extrapolations. Nevertheless, we find that the simple MP2-based basis-set additivity scheme outperforms the extrapolation approaches. For example, the following root-mean-squared deviations are obtained for the 140 basis-set limit CCSD atomization energies in the W4-11 database: 9.1 (global extrapolation), 3.7 (system-dependent extrapolation), and 2.4 (additivity scheme) kJ mol–1. The CCSD energy in these approximations is obtained from basis sets of up to TZ quality and the latter two approaches require additional MP2 calculations with basis sets of up to QZ quality. We also assess the performance of the basis-set extrapolations and additivity schemes for a set of 20 basis-set limit CCSD atomization energies of larger molecules including amino acids, DNA/RNA bases, aromatic compounds, and platonic hydrocarbon cages. We obtain the following RMSDs for the above methods: 10.2 (global extrapolation), 5.7 (system-dependent extrapolation), and 2.9 (additivity scheme) kJ mol–1.
Title: Estimating the CCSD basis-set limit energy from small basis sets: basis-set extrapolations vs additivity schemes
Description:
Coupled cluster calculations with all single and double excitations (CCSD) converge exceedingly slowly with the size of the one-particle basis set.
We assess the performance of a number of approaches for obtaining CCSD correlation energies close to the complete basis-set limit in conjunction with relatively small DZ and TZ basis sets.
These include global and system-dependent extrapolations based on the A + B/Lα two-point extrapolation formula, and the well-known additivity approach that uses an MP2-based basis-set-correction term.
We show that the basis set convergence rate can change dramatically between different systems(e.
g.
it is slower for molecules with polar bonds and/or second-row elements).
The system-dependent basis-set extrapolation scheme, in which unique basis-set extrapolation exponents for each system are obtained from lower-cost MP2 calculations, significantly accelerates the basis-set convergence relative to the global extrapolations.
Nevertheless, we find that the simple MP2-based basis-set additivity scheme outperforms the extrapolation approaches.
For example, the following root-mean-squared deviations are obtained for the 140 basis-set limit CCSD atomization energies in the W4-11 database: 9.
1 (global extrapolation), 3.
7 (system-dependent extrapolation), and 2.
4 (additivity scheme) kJ mol–1.
The CCSD energy in these approximations is obtained from basis sets of up to TZ quality and the latter two approaches require additional MP2 calculations with basis sets of up to QZ quality.
We also assess the performance of the basis-set extrapolations and additivity schemes for a set of 20 basis-set limit CCSD atomization energies of larger molecules including amino acids, DNA/RNA bases, aromatic compounds, and platonic hydrocarbon cages.
We obtain the following RMSDs for the above methods: 10.
2 (global extrapolation), 5.
7 (system-dependent extrapolation), and 2.
9 (additivity scheme) kJ mol–1.
Related Results
Cultural additivity: behavioural insights from the interaction of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism in folktales
Cultural additivity: behavioural insights from the interaction of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism in folktales
Abstract
Computational folkloristics, which is rooted in the movement to make folklore studies more scientific, has transformed the way resea...
Event-related Potential Additivity as an Index of Neural Independence
Event-related Potential Additivity as an Index of Neural Independence
Abstract
Background
Scalp-recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) are poorly suited for certain types of source analysis. For example, it is often difficult to precisely a...
XH-stretching overtone transitions calculated using explicitly correlated coupled cluster methods
XH-stretching overtone transitions calculated using explicitly correlated coupled cluster methods
We have calculated XH-stretching (where X=O, C, F, Cl) fundamental and overtone transitions for three diatomics and a few small molecules using a local mode model. The potential en...
Benchmarking anisotropic polarizabilities for 14 (hetero)-aromatic molecules at RPA, RPA(D), HRPA, HRPA(D), SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), SOPPA(CCSD), CC2, CCSD and CC3 levels
Benchmarking anisotropic polarizabilities for 14 (hetero)-aromatic molecules at RPA, RPA(D), HRPA, HRPA(D), SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), SOPPA(CCSD), CC2, CCSD and CC3 levels
A benchmark of anisotropic polarizabilities has been carried out for
14 (hetero)-aromatic molecules using the methods: RPA, RPA(D), HRPA,
HRPA(D), SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), SOPPA(CCSD), C...
Benchmarking anisotropic polarizabilities for 14 (hetero)‐aromatic molecules at RPA, RPA(D), HRPA, HRPA(D), SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), SOPPA(CCSD), CC2, CCSD and CC3 levels
Benchmarking anisotropic polarizabilities for 14 (hetero)‐aromatic molecules at RPA, RPA(D), HRPA, HRPA(D), SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), SOPPA(CCSD), CC2, CCSD and CC3 levels
AbstractA benchmark of anisotropic polarizabilities has been carried out for 14 (hetero)‐aromatic molecules using the methods: RPA, RPA(D), HRPA, HRPA(D), SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), SOPPA(...
Benchmarking NMR indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants: SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), and SOPPA(CCSD) versus CCSD
Benchmarking NMR indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants: SOPPA, SOPPA(CC2), and SOPPA(CCSD) versus CCSD
Accurate calculations of NMR indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants require especially optimized basis sets and correlated wave function methods such as CCSD or SOPPA(CCSD)....
N-body:Many-body QM:QM vibrational frequencies: Application to small hydrogen-bonded clusters
N-body:Many-body QM:QM vibrational frequencies: Application to small hydrogen-bonded clusters
We present an efficient method for reproducing CCSD(T) (i.e., the coupled-cluster method with single, double and perturbative connected triple excitations) optimized geometries and...
Full Optical Rotation Tensor at CCSD Level in the Modified Velocity Gauge
Full Optical Rotation Tensor at CCSD Level in the Modified Velocity Gauge
This work presents the first implementation of the full optical rotation (OR) tensor at coupled cluster with single and double excitations (CCSD) level in the modified velocity gau...

