Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Two ways to learn in visuomotor adaptation

View through CrossRef
Abstract Previous research has demonstrated significant inter-individual variability in the recruitment of the fast-explicit and slow-implicit processes during motor adaptation. In addition, we previously identified qualitative individual differences in adaptation linked to the formation and updating of new memory processes. Here, we investigated quantitative and qualitative differences in visuomotor adaptation with a design incorporating repeated learning and forgetting blocks, allowing for precise estimation of individual learning and forgetting rates in fast-slow adaptation models. Participants engaged in a two-day online visuomotor adaptation task. They first adapted to a 30-degree perturbation to eight targets in three blocks separated by short blocks of no feedback trials. Approximately 24 hours later, they performed a no-feedback retention block and a relearning block. We clustered the participants into strong and weak learners based on adaptation levels at the end of day one and fitted a fast-slow system to the adaptation data. Strong learners exhibited a strong negative correlation between the estimated slow and fast processes, which predicted 24-hour retention and savings, respectively, supporting the engagement of a fast-slow system. The pronounced individual differences in the recruitment of the two processes were attributed to wide ranges of estimated learning rates. Conversely, weak learners exhibited a positive correlation between the two estimated processes, as well as retention but no savings, supporting the engagement of a single slow system. Finally, both during baseline and adaptation, reaction times were shorter for weak learners. Our findings thus revealed two distinct ways to learn in visuomotor adaptation and highlight the necessity of considering both quantitative and qualitative individual differences in studies of motor learning.
Title: Two ways to learn in visuomotor adaptation
Description:
Abstract Previous research has demonstrated significant inter-individual variability in the recruitment of the fast-explicit and slow-implicit processes during motor adaptation.
In addition, we previously identified qualitative individual differences in adaptation linked to the formation and updating of new memory processes.
Here, we investigated quantitative and qualitative differences in visuomotor adaptation with a design incorporating repeated learning and forgetting blocks, allowing for precise estimation of individual learning and forgetting rates in fast-slow adaptation models.
Participants engaged in a two-day online visuomotor adaptation task.
They first adapted to a 30-degree perturbation to eight targets in three blocks separated by short blocks of no feedback trials.
Approximately 24 hours later, they performed a no-feedback retention block and a relearning block.
We clustered the participants into strong and weak learners based on adaptation levels at the end of day one and fitted a fast-slow system to the adaptation data.
Strong learners exhibited a strong negative correlation between the estimated slow and fast processes, which predicted 24-hour retention and savings, respectively, supporting the engagement of a fast-slow system.
The pronounced individual differences in the recruitment of the two processes were attributed to wide ranges of estimated learning rates.
Conversely, weak learners exhibited a positive correlation between the two estimated processes, as well as retention but no savings, supporting the engagement of a single slow system.
Finally, both during baseline and adaptation, reaction times were shorter for weak learners.
Our findings thus revealed two distinct ways to learn in visuomotor adaptation and highlight the necessity of considering both quantitative and qualitative individual differences in studies of motor learning.

Related Results

Baseline dependent differences in the perception of changes in visuomotor delay
Baseline dependent differences in the perception of changes in visuomotor delay
AbstractThe detection of, and adaptation to delayed visual movement feedback has been extensively studied. One important open question is whether the Weber-Fechner Laws hold in the...
Visuomotor prediction during action planning in the human frontoparietal cortex and cerebellum
Visuomotor prediction during action planning in the human frontoparietal cortex and cerebellum
Abstract The concept of forward models in the brain, classically applied to describing on-line motor control, can in principle be extended to action planning, i.e. a...
Visuomotor prediction during action planning in the human frontoparietal cortex and cerebellum
Visuomotor prediction during action planning in the human frontoparietal cortex and cerebellum
AbstractThe concept of forward models in the brain, classically applied to describing on-line motor control, can in principle be extended to action planning; i.e., assuming forward...
Validation of a rehabilitation platform for visuomotor perceptual and cognitive stimulation
Validation of a rehabilitation platform for visuomotor perceptual and cognitive stimulation
Stroke, or cerebrovascular accident, is a major global health problem and one of the leading causes of death and acquired disability worldwide. After a stroke, deficits in perceptu...
Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Schule und Spiel – mehr als reine Wissensvermittlung
Die öffentliche Schule Quest to learn in New York City ist eine Modell-Schule, die in ihren Lehrmethoden auf spielbasiertes Lernen, Game Design und den Game Design Prozess setzt. I...
The posterior parietal cortex contributes to visuomotor processing for saccades in blindsight macaques
The posterior parietal cortex contributes to visuomotor processing for saccades in blindsight macaques
AbstractPatients with damage to the primary visual cortex (V1) lose visual awareness, yet retain the ability to perform visuomotor tasks, which is called “blindsight.” To understan...
Task dependent cortico-cerebellar responses to delayed visual movement feedback
Task dependent cortico-cerebellar responses to delayed visual movement feedback
AbstractForward models in the brain issue predictions of sensory movement consequences that can establish self-other distinction through comparison with actual feedback. But forwar...

Back to Top