Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

“The Shelley Legend”

View through CrossRef
Late in 1945 appeared a book entitled The Shelley Legend. It was published by Charles Scribner's Sons, and was written by Professor Robert M. Smith of Lehigh University in collaboration with Mr. Theodore G. Ehrsam, Miss Martha M. Schlegel, and Mr. Louis A. Waters. These authors began their labors in 1943 with apparently no previous experience in Shelley research and in less than two years claim to have discovered not only the real Shelley but also the fact that the patient biographical and critical labors of a long line of predecessors are in the main wrong. They even “venture the opinion that at least fifty per cent of the present attitude toward Shelley still stems from this cult [Lady Shelley's] of worshippers.” (p. 305) Their predecessors include Leigh Hunt, Mary Shelley, Thomas Medwin, T. J. Hogg, T. L. Peacock, E. J. Trelawny, Lady Jane Shelley, Richard Garnett, D. F. MacCarthy, W. M Rossetti, H. Buxton Forman, J. Cordy Jeaffreson, Edward Dowden, Mrs. Julian Marshall, J. A. Symonds, William Sharpe, A. J. Koszul, Mrs. Helen Rossetti Angeli, Walter Peck, André Maurois, Newman I. White, and a host of lesser contributors, many of whom are of the highest intellectual and scholarly attainments. It is claimed that these intelligent people, who have accumulated, tested, and published the greatest quantity of materials on any modern writer, have lacked discernment sufficient to free themselves from a false interpretation of Shelley presented to the world by Mary Shelley and Lady Jane Shelley and have been unable to base their conclusions on the facts in hand. This claim is made in spite of the fact, evident from the book itself, that no authors in question except Richard Garnett, Dowden, and Mrs. Marshall can in any way be shown as coming within the sphere of Lady Shelley's influence, and in spite of the fact that some were positive rebels against any possible influence of Lady Shelley; namely, Peacock, Trelawny, W. M. Rossetti, and J. Cordy Jeaffreson.
Title: “The Shelley Legend”
Description:
Late in 1945 appeared a book entitled The Shelley Legend.
It was published by Charles Scribner's Sons, and was written by Professor Robert M.
Smith of Lehigh University in collaboration with Mr.
Theodore G.
Ehrsam, Miss Martha M.
Schlegel, and Mr.
Louis A.
Waters.
These authors began their labors in 1943 with apparently no previous experience in Shelley research and in less than two years claim to have discovered not only the real Shelley but also the fact that the patient biographical and critical labors of a long line of predecessors are in the main wrong.
They even “venture the opinion that at least fifty per cent of the present attitude toward Shelley still stems from this cult [Lady Shelley's] of worshippers.
” (p.
305) Their predecessors include Leigh Hunt, Mary Shelley, Thomas Medwin, T.
J.
Hogg, T.
L.
Peacock, E.
J.
Trelawny, Lady Jane Shelley, Richard Garnett, D.
F.
MacCarthy, W.
M Rossetti, H.
Buxton Forman, J.
Cordy Jeaffreson, Edward Dowden, Mrs.
Julian Marshall, J.
A.
Symonds, William Sharpe, A.
J.
Koszul, Mrs.
Helen Rossetti Angeli, Walter Peck, André Maurois, Newman I.
White, and a host of lesser contributors, many of whom are of the highest intellectual and scholarly attainments.
It is claimed that these intelligent people, who have accumulated, tested, and published the greatest quantity of materials on any modern writer, have lacked discernment sufficient to free themselves from a false interpretation of Shelley presented to the world by Mary Shelley and Lady Jane Shelley and have been unable to base their conclusions on the facts in hand.
This claim is made in spite of the fact, evident from the book itself, that no authors in question except Richard Garnett, Dowden, and Mrs.
Marshall can in any way be shown as coming within the sphere of Lady Shelley's influence, and in spite of the fact that some were positive rebels against any possible influence of Lady Shelley; namely, Peacock, Trelawny, W.
M.
Rossetti, and J.
Cordy Jeaffreson.

Related Results

Like Lady Godiva
Like Lady Godiva
Introducing Lady Godiva through a Fan-Historical Lens The legend of Lady Godiva, who famously rode naked through the streets of Coventry, veiled only by her long, flowing hair, has...
Percy Bysshe Shelley
Percy Bysshe Shelley
Percy Bysshe Shelley (b. 1792–d. 1822) is now recognized as a major writer, chiefly a poet, of the Romantic period. His life was short, peripatetic, and frequently dogged by scanda...
EKSISTENSI LEGENDA ORANG KAYO HITAM DI JAMBI
EKSISTENSI LEGENDA ORANG KAYO HITAM DI JAMBI
The legend of the Orang Kayo Hitam is a folk tale from Jambi. The legend of the Orang Kayo Hitam develops between spoken and written. The legend of the Orang Kayo Hitam is consider...
Browning and Shelley
Browning and Shelley
The question of Shelley's influence on the young Robert Browning is hardly a disputed one, but the question of how far it continues into the life and work of the later Browning is ...
Beatrice Unbound: Adaptations of Shelley’s The Cenci
Beatrice Unbound: Adaptations of Shelley’s The Cenci
This essay considers three twentieth-century re-imaginings of Shelley’s The Cenci : Artaud’s play Les Cenci , Bernold Goldschmidt’s ...
Mourning Life: William Wordsworth and Percy Bysshe Shelley
Mourning Life: William Wordsworth and Percy Bysshe Shelley
What does it mean that Shelley publicly mourns the death a living Wordsworth in his poetry? This essay argues that Percy Bysshe Shelley's renunciation of a narrow concept of selfho...
The “silver net of civilization”: Aesthetic Imperialism in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man
The “silver net of civilization”: Aesthetic Imperialism in Mary Shelley’s The Last Man
This essay examines the interrelations of religion, civilization, and imperialism in Shelley’s The Last Man. Though Shelley may envision the negative effects of imperialism in this...

Back to Top