Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

One-year outcome and survival analysis of deferred ventricular septal repair in cardiogenic shock supported with mechanical circulatory support

View through CrossRef
Background and objective The effectiveness of deferred surgical repair of ventricular septal rupture (VSR) post-myocardial infarction (MI) with cardiogenic shock remains limited to case reports. Our study aimed to investigate the outcomes and survival analysis following mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients after VSR who develop cardiogenic shock. Methods We analyzed 27 patients with post-MI VSR and cardiogenic shock who received deferred surgical repair while stabilized on MCS between January 2018 and March 2020. After normality test adjustments, continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). These were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. To identify predictors of operative mortality, univariate analysis of clinical characteristics and interventions followed by logistic regression was carried out. P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results All patients had preoperative MCS. Emergency repair was avoided in all the patients. The mean age of the participants was 64.96 with the majority being males (74.1%). On average, the mean time from MI to VSR repair was 18.85 days. Delayed revascularization was associated with increased mortality (OR 17.500, 95% CI 2.365–129.506, P = 0.005). Other factors associated with increased mortality were ejection fraction (EF), three-vessel disease, Killip class, early surgery, and prolonged use of inotropes. The operative mortality was 11% with an overall mortality of 33.3%. The one-year survival rate was 66.7%. Conclusion The use of MCS in adjunct to a deferred surgical approach shows an improved survival outcome of patients with VSR complicated by cardiogenic shock. Further investigations are required regarding the optimal time for MCS and surgical repair.
Title: One-year outcome and survival analysis of deferred ventricular septal repair in cardiogenic shock supported with mechanical circulatory support
Description:
Background and objective The effectiveness of deferred surgical repair of ventricular septal rupture (VSR) post-myocardial infarction (MI) with cardiogenic shock remains limited to case reports.
Our study aimed to investigate the outcomes and survival analysis following mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients after VSR who develop cardiogenic shock.
Methods We analyzed 27 patients with post-MI VSR and cardiogenic shock who received deferred surgical repair while stabilized on MCS between January 2018 and March 2020.
After normality test adjustments, continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
These were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Student’s t-test.
Categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.
To identify predictors of operative mortality, univariate analysis of clinical characteristics and interventions followed by logistic regression was carried out.
P-value of < 0.
05 was considered significant.
Results All patients had preoperative MCS.
Emergency repair was avoided in all the patients.
The mean age of the participants was 64.
96 with the majority being males (74.
1%).
On average, the mean time from MI to VSR repair was 18.
85 days.
Delayed revascularization was associated with increased mortality (OR 17.
500, 95% CI 2.
365–129.
506, P = 0.
005).
Other factors associated with increased mortality were ejection fraction (EF), three-vessel disease, Killip class, early surgery, and prolonged use of inotropes.
The operative mortality was 11% with an overall mortality of 33.
3%.
The one-year survival rate was 66.
7%.
Conclusion The use of MCS in adjunct to a deferred surgical approach shows an improved survival outcome of patients with VSR complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Further investigations are required regarding the optimal time for MCS and surgical repair.

Related Results

Left ventricular pseudo-false aneurysm after ventricular septal dissection closure: a case report
Left ventricular pseudo-false aneurysm after ventricular septal dissection closure: a case report
Abstract Background Left ventricular pseudo-false aneurysm is a rare complication of myocardial infarction and generally caused by an intramyocardia...
Cardiogenic shock: role of invasive cardiology
Cardiogenic shock: role of invasive cardiology
Purpose of review Early revascularization significantly improved the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Nevertheles...
The Incidence of Isolated Ventricular Septal Defect in Libyan Newborns
The Incidence of Isolated Ventricular Septal Defect in Libyan Newborns
This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and spontaneous closure of ventricular septal defects in a randomly selected newborn population, using color Doppler echocardiographic sc...

Back to Top