Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis and treatment in actual clinical practice in the Republic of Bashkortostan: analysis for 2020
View through CrossRef
Introduction. Th e growing incidence of oropharyngeal cancer is driven by an increase in frequency of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. Th e morbidity pattern of oropharyngeal cancer is area-specific.Aim. To analyze the oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis and treatment in the Republic of Bashkortostan for 2020.Materials and methods. Th e authors carried out a 2020 retrospective analysis of the diagnosis and treatment results of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. 79 patients were identified with this diagnosis. 84.8% (67/79) among them were males and 15.2% females (12/79). Th e mean age of the patients was 59.1 years. Th e site of primary tumor was on the oropharynx lateral wall in 37.8% cases (30/79), in the tongue root area — 24.1% (19/79), in the tonsils area — 17.7% (14/79), on the soft palate — 16.5% (13/79), on the oropharynx posterior wall — 3.8% (3/79).Results. Examination of tumor morphological types revealed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with various degrees of differentiation in 92.4% cases (73/79), adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland — in 6.3% (5/79) and sarcoma in 1.2% (1/79). 57.5% of 73 patients with SCC (42/73) underwent protein (p16) immunohistochemistry, while 42.5% of the patients (31/73) did not. According to a surrogate marker for HPV, the following results were obtained for 42 patients: p16-positive in 23.8% cases (10/42), p16-negative in 76.2% (32/42). Stage distribution according to TNM-7: stage I — 11.4% (9/79), stage II — 17.7% (14/79), stage III — 36.7% (29/79), stage IV — 46.8% (37/79). Stage distribution according to TNM-8 (patients who underwent p16 immunohistochemistry): stage I — 11.9% (5/42), stage II — 23.8% (10/42), stage III — 19% (8/42), stage IV — 45.2% (19/42). In 2020, 72% of patients (57/79) received definitive treatment, 10.1% (8/79) — palliative care, 15.2% (12/79) — supportive care, and 2.5% (2/79) refused medical treatment.Discussion. Th e various types of radiation therapy were used as the main defi nitive treatment for patients with oropharyngeal cancer in 69.2% cases (45/65). Only 18.5% of patients (12/65) underwent surgery, 58.3% of which (7/12) received post-surgery radiation therapy.Conclusion. 57.5% of patients (42/73) were detected with HPV status, 23.8% (10/42) revealed surrogate markers for HPV association. 69.2% of patients (45/65) received radiation therapy as the definitive treatment. 18.5% of patients (12/65) underwent surgery, 58.3% of which (7/12) received postsurgery radiation therapy.
Title: Oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis and treatment in actual clinical practice in the Republic of Bashkortostan: analysis for 2020
Description:
Introduction.
Th e growing incidence of oropharyngeal cancer is driven by an increase in frequency of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer.
Th e morbidity pattern of oropharyngeal cancer is area-specific.
Aim.
To analyze the oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis and treatment in the Republic of Bashkortostan for 2020.
Materials and methods.
Th e authors carried out a 2020 retrospective analysis of the diagnosis and treatment results of patients with oropharyngeal cancer.
79 patients were identified with this diagnosis.
84.
8% (67/79) among them were males and 15.
2% females (12/79).
Th e mean age of the patients was 59.
1 years.
Th e site of primary tumor was on the oropharynx lateral wall in 37.
8% cases (30/79), in the tongue root area — 24.
1% (19/79), in the tonsils area — 17.
7% (14/79), on the soft palate — 16.
5% (13/79), on the oropharynx posterior wall — 3.
8% (3/79).
Results.
Examination of tumor morphological types revealed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with various degrees of differentiation in 92.
4% cases (73/79), adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland — in 6.
3% (5/79) and sarcoma in 1.
2% (1/79).
57.
5% of 73 patients with SCC (42/73) underwent protein (p16) immunohistochemistry, while 42.
5% of the patients (31/73) did not.
According to a surrogate marker for HPV, the following results were obtained for 42 patients: p16-positive in 23.
8% cases (10/42), p16-negative in 76.
2% (32/42).
Stage distribution according to TNM-7: stage I — 11.
4% (9/79), stage II — 17.
7% (14/79), stage III — 36.
7% (29/79), stage IV — 46.
8% (37/79).
Stage distribution according to TNM-8 (patients who underwent p16 immunohistochemistry): stage I — 11.
9% (5/42), stage II — 23.
8% (10/42), stage III — 19% (8/42), stage IV — 45.
2% (19/42).
In 2020, 72% of patients (57/79) received definitive treatment, 10.
1% (8/79) — palliative care, 15.
2% (12/79) — supportive care, and 2.
5% (2/79) refused medical treatment.
Discussion.
Th e various types of radiation therapy were used as the main defi nitive treatment for patients with oropharyngeal cancer in 69.
2% cases (45/65).
Only 18.
5% of patients (12/65) underwent surgery, 58.
3% of which (7/12) received post-surgery radiation therapy.
Conclusion.
57.
5% of patients (42/73) were detected with HPV status, 23.
8% (10/42) revealed surrogate markers for HPV association.
69.
2% of patients (45/65) received radiation therapy as the definitive treatment.
18.
5% of patients (12/65) underwent surgery, 58.
3% of which (7/12) received postsurgery radiation therapy.
Related Results
African Annals of Medicine reviewers in 2024
African Annals of Medicine reviewers in 2024
Le comité éditorial des Annales Africaines de Médecine tient à remercier les lecteurs qui ont analysé les manuscrits soumis pour publication au cours de l’année 2024 et ont ainsi d...
Role of telemedicine in cancer service Republic of Bashkortostan
Role of telemedicine in cancer service Republic of Bashkortostan
Introduction. The topic of telemedicine in Russia is now extremely relevant in connection with the current coronavirus infection in the pandemic. Diagnostics and prevention of the ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Does Chin-Throat Length Relate to Oropharyngeal Volume, Minimum Axial Area, and Polysomnographic Indices?
Does Chin-Throat Length Relate to Oropharyngeal Volume, Minimum Axial Area, and Polysomnographic Indices?
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the correlation between chin-throat length and oropharyngeal volume, minimum axial area, and polysomnographic indices in patients undergoing orthodontic trea...

