Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis and treatment in actual clinical practice in the Republic of Bashkortostan: analysis for 2020
View through CrossRef
Introduction. Th e growing incidence of oropharyngeal cancer is driven by an increase in frequency of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. Th e morbidity pattern of oropharyngeal cancer is area-specific.Aim. To analyze the oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis and treatment in the Republic of Bashkortostan for 2020.Materials and methods. Th e authors carried out a 2020 retrospective analysis of the diagnosis and treatment results of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. 79 patients were identified with this diagnosis. 84.8% (67/79) among them were males and 15.2% females (12/79). Th e mean age of the patients was 59.1 years. Th e site of primary tumor was on the oropharynx lateral wall in 37.8% cases (30/79), in the tongue root area — 24.1% (19/79), in the tonsils area — 17.7% (14/79), on the soft palate — 16.5% (13/79), on the oropharynx posterior wall — 3.8% (3/79).Results. Examination of tumor morphological types revealed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with various degrees of differentiation in 92.4% cases (73/79), adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland — in 6.3% (5/79) and sarcoma in 1.2% (1/79). 57.5% of 73 patients with SCC (42/73) underwent protein (p16) immunohistochemistry, while 42.5% of the patients (31/73) did not. According to a surrogate marker for HPV, the following results were obtained for 42 patients: p16-positive in 23.8% cases (10/42), p16-negative in 76.2% (32/42). Stage distribution according to TNM-7: stage I — 11.4% (9/79), stage II — 17.7% (14/79), stage III — 36.7% (29/79), stage IV — 46.8% (37/79). Stage distribution according to TNM-8 (patients who underwent p16 immunohistochemistry): stage I — 11.9% (5/42), stage II — 23.8% (10/42), stage III — 19% (8/42), stage IV — 45.2% (19/42). In 2020, 72% of patients (57/79) received definitive treatment, 10.1% (8/79) — palliative care, 15.2% (12/79) — supportive care, and 2.5% (2/79) refused medical treatment.Discussion. Th e various types of radiation therapy were used as the main defi nitive treatment for patients with oropharyngeal cancer in 69.2% cases (45/65). Only 18.5% of patients (12/65) underwent surgery, 58.3% of which (7/12) received post-surgery radiation therapy.Conclusion. 57.5% of patients (42/73) were detected with HPV status, 23.8% (10/42) revealed surrogate markers for HPV association. 69.2% of patients (45/65) received radiation therapy as the definitive treatment. 18.5% of patients (12/65) underwent surgery, 58.3% of which (7/12) received postsurgery radiation therapy.
Title: Oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis and treatment in actual clinical practice in the Republic of Bashkortostan: analysis for 2020
Description:
Introduction.
Th e growing incidence of oropharyngeal cancer is driven by an increase in frequency of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer.
Th e morbidity pattern of oropharyngeal cancer is area-specific.
Aim.
To analyze the oropharyngeal cancer diagnosis and treatment in the Republic of Bashkortostan for 2020.
Materials and methods.
Th e authors carried out a 2020 retrospective analysis of the diagnosis and treatment results of patients with oropharyngeal cancer.
79 patients were identified with this diagnosis.
84.
8% (67/79) among them were males and 15.
2% females (12/79).
Th e mean age of the patients was 59.
1 years.
Th e site of primary tumor was on the oropharynx lateral wall in 37.
8% cases (30/79), in the tongue root area — 24.
1% (19/79), in the tonsils area — 17.
7% (14/79), on the soft palate — 16.
5% (13/79), on the oropharynx posterior wall — 3.
8% (3/79).
Results.
Examination of tumor morphological types revealed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) with various degrees of differentiation in 92.
4% cases (73/79), adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland — in 6.
3% (5/79) and sarcoma in 1.
2% (1/79).
57.
5% of 73 patients with SCC (42/73) underwent protein (p16) immunohistochemistry, while 42.
5% of the patients (31/73) did not.
According to a surrogate marker for HPV, the following results were obtained for 42 patients: p16-positive in 23.
8% cases (10/42), p16-negative in 76.
2% (32/42).
Stage distribution according to TNM-7: stage I — 11.
4% (9/79), stage II — 17.
7% (14/79), stage III — 36.
7% (29/79), stage IV — 46.
8% (37/79).
Stage distribution according to TNM-8 (patients who underwent p16 immunohistochemistry): stage I — 11.
9% (5/42), stage II — 23.
8% (10/42), stage III — 19% (8/42), stage IV — 45.
2% (19/42).
In 2020, 72% of patients (57/79) received definitive treatment, 10.
1% (8/79) — palliative care, 15.
2% (12/79) — supportive care, and 2.
5% (2/79) refused medical treatment.
Discussion.
Th e various types of radiation therapy were used as the main defi nitive treatment for patients with oropharyngeal cancer in 69.
2% cases (45/65).
Only 18.
5% of patients (12/65) underwent surgery, 58.
3% of which (7/12) received post-surgery radiation therapy.
Conclusion.
57.
5% of patients (42/73) were detected with HPV status, 23.
8% (10/42) revealed surrogate markers for HPV association.
69.
2% of patients (45/65) received radiation therapy as the definitive treatment.
18.
5% of patients (12/65) underwent surgery, 58.
3% of which (7/12) received postsurgery radiation therapy.
Related Results
African Annals of Medicine reviewers in 2024
African Annals of Medicine reviewers in 2024
Le comité éditorial des Annales Africaines de Médecine tient à remercier les lecteurs qui ont analysé les manuscrits soumis pour publication au cours de l’année 2024 et ont ainsi d...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract
A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Diagnostic Rate of the Cancer by BDORT Utilizing the Cancer Slide
Diagnostic Rate of the Cancer by BDORT Utilizing the Cancer Slide
Purpose:
To make a diagnosis of cancer with BDORT (resonance test), we can choose two methods. One is to use a chemical agent like Integrin α5β1 or Oncogene C-f...
Does Chin-Throat Length Relate to Oropharyngeal Volume, Minimum Axial Area, and Polysomnographic Indices?
Does Chin-Throat Length Relate to Oropharyngeal Volume, Minimum Axial Area, and Polysomnographic Indices?
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the correlation between chin-throat length and oropharyngeal volume, minimum axial area, and polysomnographic indices in patients undergoing orthodontic trea...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...

