Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Vaping Cessation Interventions: A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (Preprint)

View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND The increasing prevalence of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, particularly among young individuals, has led to a pressing need for effective vaping cessation interventions. OBJECTIVE To summarize the available evidence on vaping cessation interventions, identify key challenges, and highlight future research directions METHODS We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov. for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating behavioral, pharmacological, and combination interventions aimed at vaping cessation. The search period spanned from 2004 (year of first e-cigarette patent) to April 27, 2025. The outcome of interest was abstinence from vaping at a maximum follow-up. RESULTS A total of 11 RCTs, involving 8,182 participants, were identified. These trials investigated behavioral therapy, including tailored text messaging support (n=4), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT; n=3), varenicline (n=3), and cytisine (n=1). Studies were published between 2021 and 2025, with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 24 months. Most RCTs focused on adults or young adults. Behavioral interventions showed potential to support quitting at follow-up beyond 6 months; however, results were not consistent across trials. While varenicline demonstrated promise as a pharmacological aid for vaping cessation, available RCTs had small sample sizes and short follow-up periods, limiting the strength of the evidence. None of the RCTs investigating the efficacy of NRT (567 participants) or cytisine (160 participants) for vaping cessation showed superiority over the control after treatment discontinuation CONCLUSIONS With millions of people using e-cigarettes daily and limited data on their long-term safety, stronger evidence is needed to guide vaping cessation strategies.
Title: Vaping Cessation Interventions: A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (Preprint)
Description:
BACKGROUND The increasing prevalence of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use, particularly among young individuals, has led to a pressing need for effective vaping cessation interventions.
OBJECTIVE To summarize the available evidence on vaping cessation interventions, identify key challenges, and highlight future research directions METHODS We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.
gov.
for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating behavioral, pharmacological, and combination interventions aimed at vaping cessation.
The search period spanned from 2004 (year of first e-cigarette patent) to April 27, 2025.
The outcome of interest was abstinence from vaping at a maximum follow-up.
RESULTS A total of 11 RCTs, involving 8,182 participants, were identified.
These trials investigated behavioral therapy, including tailored text messaging support (n=4), nicotine replacement therapy (NRT; n=3), varenicline (n=3), and cytisine (n=1).
Studies were published between 2021 and 2025, with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 24 months.
Most RCTs focused on adults or young adults.
Behavioral interventions showed potential to support quitting at follow-up beyond 6 months; however, results were not consistent across trials.
While varenicline demonstrated promise as a pharmacological aid for vaping cessation, available RCTs had small sample sizes and short follow-up periods, limiting the strength of the evidence.
None of the RCTs investigating the efficacy of NRT (567 participants) or cytisine (160 participants) for vaping cessation showed superiority over the control after treatment discontinuation CONCLUSIONS With millions of people using e-cigarettes daily and limited data on their long-term safety, stronger evidence is needed to guide vaping cessation strategies.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
“I just wish vaping wasn’t a thing”: a qualitative study of parental concerns and attitudes towards adolescent vaping.
“I just wish vaping wasn’t a thing”: a qualitative study of parental concerns and attitudes towards adolescent vaping.
Abstract Background: With the rapid increase of e-cigarette or vaping in adolescents, parents can provide unique perspectives to assist in addressing this issue. As researc...
Co-designing a Vaping Cessation Program for Australian Young Adults: A Conceptual Model
Co-designing a Vaping Cessation Program for Australian Young Adults: A Conceptual Model
Abstract Introduction Australian young adults (YA) report difficulties in quitting vaping. This study sought to understand what ...
Impact of Smoking and Vaping in Films on Smoking and Vaping Uptake in Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Impact of Smoking and Vaping in Films on Smoking and Vaping Uptake in Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Prevention of smoking uptake in young people is an essential public health target. We have previously reported a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of exposure to sm...
New image, same tactics: global tobacco and vaping industry strategies to promote youth vaping
New image, same tactics: global tobacco and vaping industry strategies to promote youth vaping
Abstract E-cigarette use (or vaping) is widespread in young people and is a rapidly growing public health problem. While the tobacco and vaping industry has promoted...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

Back to Top