Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Habitat selection when killing primary versus alternative prey species supports prey specialization in an apex predator

View through CrossRef
© 2019 The Zoological Society of London Many predators specialize on one or several prey species that they select from the range of potential prey. Predator specialization on primary versus alternative prey is driven in part by encounter rates with prey and a predator’s habitat selection. Although habitat selection changes with behavioural state, this has not been well-recognized in the resource selection function (RSF) literature to date, often because auxiliary data on the predator’s behavioural states (e.g. hunting) are absent. We monitored habitat selection of pumas Puma concolor in a multi-prey system in northern California, where pumas specialized on black-tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus columbianus. We employed multiple RSF analyses on different datasets to test the following three hypotheses: (1) Pumas utilize habitats in proportion to their availability; (2) Pumas select specific habitat features when killing black-tailed deer, their primary prey; (3) Pumas do not select distinct habitats from those identified under hypothesis 1 when killing alternative prey. We found that pumas in our study selected for specific habitats and habitat features in general, but that their selection was more pronounced when killing black-tailed deer. In summer, kill sites of deer were associated with rugged terrain, but gentle slopes and northerly aspects. In winter, pumas killed deer at low elevations, on gentle slopes and on northerly and westerly aspects. Overall, evidence suggested that pumas tracked their primary prey across seasonal migrations, which were short in distance but resulted in pronounced changes in elevation. When killing alternative prey, pumas showed little evidence of habitat selection, suggesting they may kill alternative prey opportunistically. Our results hold implications for how data should be partitioned when modelling baseline habitat selection of predators, hunting habitat selection and predation risk for prey species, as well as for how we model ecological processes such as apparent competition.
Victoria University of Wellington Library
Title: Habitat selection when killing primary versus alternative prey species supports prey specialization in an apex predator
Description:
© 2019 The Zoological Society of London Many predators specialize on one or several prey species that they select from the range of potential prey.
Predator specialization on primary versus alternative prey is driven in part by encounter rates with prey and a predator’s habitat selection.
Although habitat selection changes with behavioural state, this has not been well-recognized in the resource selection function (RSF) literature to date, often because auxiliary data on the predator’s behavioural states (e.
g.
hunting) are absent.
We monitored habitat selection of pumas Puma concolor in a multi-prey system in northern California, where pumas specialized on black-tailed deer Odocoileus hemionus columbianus.
We employed multiple RSF analyses on different datasets to test the following three hypotheses: (1) Pumas utilize habitats in proportion to their availability; (2) Pumas select specific habitat features when killing black-tailed deer, their primary prey; (3) Pumas do not select distinct habitats from those identified under hypothesis 1 when killing alternative prey.
We found that pumas in our study selected for specific habitats and habitat features in general, but that their selection was more pronounced when killing black-tailed deer.
In summer, kill sites of deer were associated with rugged terrain, but gentle slopes and northerly aspects.
In winter, pumas killed deer at low elevations, on gentle slopes and on northerly and westerly aspects.
Overall, evidence suggested that pumas tracked their primary prey across seasonal migrations, which were short in distance but resulted in pronounced changes in elevation.
When killing alternative prey, pumas showed little evidence of habitat selection, suggesting they may kill alternative prey opportunistically.
Our results hold implications for how data should be partitioned when modelling baseline habitat selection of predators, hunting habitat selection and predation risk for prey species, as well as for how we model ecological processes such as apparent competition.

Related Results

Interspecific carnivore competition and ungulate predation correlate with predator species richness
Interspecific carnivore competition and ungulate predation correlate with predator species richness
AbstractCompetition for resources underlies the development of ecological community structure and function. Niche compression occurs when species reduce resource use due to competi...
Avian Responses to Novel Landscapes in Aotearoa
Avian Responses to Novel Landscapes in Aotearoa
<p><strong>The alteration of natural landscapes for human use creates a mosaic of different habitats, varied in how much they have been modified from a natural baseline...
Impacts of man-made structures on marine biodiversity and species status - native & non-native species
Impacts of man-made structures on marine biodiversity and species status - native & non-native species
<p>Coastal environments are exposed to anthropogenic activities such as frequent marine traffic and restructuring, i.e., addition, removal or replacing with man-made structur...
Analisis Dinamik Model Predator-Prey Dengan Fungsi Respon Monod Haldane
Analisis Dinamik Model Predator-Prey Dengan Fungsi Respon Monod Haldane
Setiap makhluk hidup tidak terlepas untuk berinteraksi dengan makhluk hidup lainnya.Interaksi terjadi ketika dua atau lebih spesies memiliki efek atau mempunyai pengaruh terhadap m...
Shared predation: positive effects of predator distraction
Shared predation: positive effects of predator distraction
AbstractSimple rules based on population equilibria can characterize indirect interactions in three-species systems but fail to predict them when considering behavioral mechanisms....
Estimating the impact of 'Predator Free' Wellington on Wellington tree wētā (Hemideina crassidens)
Estimating the impact of 'Predator Free' Wellington on Wellington tree wētā (Hemideina crassidens)
<p><strong>The Wellington tree wētā (Hemideina crassidens) is a large-bodied nocturnal insect native to Aotearoa New Zealand. H. crassidens can inhabit environments wit...

Back to Top