Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract B019: Estimating the costs and cost-effectiveness of promoting mammography screening among US-based Latinas

View through CrossRef
Abstract Purpose: We characterize the costs and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker (CHW)-based intervention to promote screening mammography among US-based non-adherent Latinas. Methods: The parent study was a randomized controlled trial for 536 Latinas aged 42-74 years old who had sought care within a safety net health center in Western Washington. Participants were block-randomized within clinic to the control arm (usual care) or intervention arm (CHW-led motivational interviewing intervention). We used the perspective of the organization implementing promotional activities to characterize costs and cost-effectiveness. Cost data were categorized as program set-up and maintenance (initial training, booster/annual training) program implementation (administrative activities, intervention delivery); and, overhead/miscellaneous expenses. Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost of screening for each additional woman screened between the intervention and control arms. Results: The respective costs per participant for standard care and the intervention arm were $69.96 and $300.99. Most costs pertained to program implementation and administrative activities specifically. The incremental cost per additional woman screened was $2,595.32. Conclusions: Our findings are within the ranges of costs and cost-effectiveness for other CHW programs to promote screening mammography among underserved populations. Our strong study design and focus on non-adherent women provides important strengths to this body of work, especially given implementation and dissemination science efforts regarding CHW-based health promotion for health disparity populations. Citation Format: Catherine M Pichardo, Yamilé Molina, Donald L Patrick, Scott D Ramsey, Sonia Bishop, Shirley A.A. Beresford, Gloria D Coronado. Estimating the costs and cost-effectiveness of promoting mammography screening among US-based Latinas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B019.
Title: Abstract B019: Estimating the costs and cost-effectiveness of promoting mammography screening among US-based Latinas
Description:
Abstract Purpose: We characterize the costs and cost-effectiveness of a community health worker (CHW)-based intervention to promote screening mammography among US-based non-adherent Latinas.
Methods: The parent study was a randomized controlled trial for 536 Latinas aged 42-74 years old who had sought care within a safety net health center in Western Washington.
Participants were block-randomized within clinic to the control arm (usual care) or intervention arm (CHW-led motivational interviewing intervention).
We used the perspective of the organization implementing promotional activities to characterize costs and cost-effectiveness.
Cost data were categorized as program set-up and maintenance (initial training, booster/annual training) program implementation (administrative activities, intervention delivery); and, overhead/miscellaneous expenses.
Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost of screening for each additional woman screened between the intervention and control arms.
Results: The respective costs per participant for standard care and the intervention arm were $69.
96 and $300.
99.
Most costs pertained to program implementation and administrative activities specifically.
The incremental cost per additional woman screened was $2,595.
32.
Conclusions: Our findings are within the ranges of costs and cost-effectiveness for other CHW programs to promote screening mammography among underserved populations.
Our strong study design and focus on non-adherent women provides important strengths to this body of work, especially given implementation and dissemination science efforts regarding CHW-based health promotion for health disparity populations.
Citation Format: Catherine M Pichardo, Yamilé Molina, Donald L Patrick, Scott D Ramsey, Sonia Bishop, Shirley A.
A.
Beresford, Gloria D Coronado.
Estimating the costs and cost-effectiveness of promoting mammography screening among US-based Latinas [abstract].
In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B019.

Related Results

Abstract IA15: Neighborhood factors and changes in mammography screening rates in response to promotora intervention in Latinas
Abstract IA15: Neighborhood factors and changes in mammography screening rates in response to promotora intervention in Latinas
Abstract Latinas have relatively low rates of mammography screening participation, which may contribute to later stage of breast cancer at diagnosis for Latinas, and...
Multilevel Intervention Raises Latina Participation in Mammography Screening: Findings from ¡Fortaleza Latina!
Multilevel Intervention Raises Latina Participation in Mammography Screening: Findings from ¡Fortaleza Latina!
Abstract Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women in the United States, and Latinas have relatively low rates of screening participat...
Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic
Intervention to Improve Mammography Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic
Background: Most late-stage breast cancer occurs in those who have never been screened. Uninsured women have lower screening rates than insured women. Student-run free clinics (SRF...
Abstract P5-01-02: Glandular dose in contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography
Abstract P5-01-02: Glandular dose in contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography
Abstract INTRODUCTION Estimation of the Average Glandular Dose (AGD) absorbed by the breast during x-ray based examination is an established part of q...
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness, efficiency and implementation of cash transfers in humanitarian settings. The review summarises evidence from five studi...
Expanding the Usefulness of Unit Supply Cost
Expanding the Usefulness of Unit Supply Cost
Abstract Unit supply cost is a widely used tool in the energy business for providing a one number-unit cost description. For example, controllable costs such as f...
Knowledge, attitude and uptake of mammography among female health workers in two tertiary health facilities of Sokoto state, Nigeria
Knowledge, attitude and uptake of mammography among female health workers in two tertiary health facilities of Sokoto state, Nigeria
Background: Globally, breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and early detection remains the cornerstone of breast cancer control in terms of outcome and survival. Female...

Back to Top