Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Patients with Lumbar Disc Prolapse Undergoing Conservative versus Surgical Management in a Tertiary Hospital of Bangladesh
View through CrossRef
Background: Lumbar disc prolapse is one of the most common causes of low back pain and sciatica, affecting individuals in their most productive years. It occurs when the intervertebral disc herniates and compresses adjacent nerve roots, leading to varying degrees of pain, sensory disturbances, and functional impairment. This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of patients with lumbar disc prolapse who underwent either conservative or surgical management. Methods: This comparative observational study was conducted at National Institute of Traumatology & Orthopaedic Rehabilitation (NITOR) and the Orthopedic Department of Sylhet M.A.G. Osmani Medical College Hospital, Sylhet, Bangladesh from January to December 2022. It included 100 patients with MRI-confirmed lumbar disc prolapse, divided into two equal groups: 50 received conservative treatment (rest, analgesics, physiotherapy) and 50 underwent surgical intervention (discectomy or decompression). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, with a p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant. Result: In this study of 100 patients with lumbar disc prolapse, both conservative and surgical groups showed significant improvement in pain, but surgical patients experienced greater and faster relief (VAS reduction: 6.7 vs 4.4; p=0.001). Disc extrusion and neurological deficits were more common in the surgical group. While conservative management had a higher symptom recurrence (10% vs 4%), surgical patients experienced minor complications like wound infection (6%) and transient nerve irritation (8%). Overall, surgical treatment provided better short-term outcomes in selected patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that both conservative and surgical treatments are effective for lumbar disc prolapse, but surgery provides faster and greater pain relief, especially in cases with prolonged symptoms, neurological deficits, or disc extrusion on MRI. Conservative management remains suitable for milder cases, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment based on clinical severity and imaging findings.
Title: Clinical Profile and Outcomes of Patients with Lumbar Disc Prolapse Undergoing Conservative versus Surgical Management in a Tertiary Hospital of Bangladesh
Description:
Background: Lumbar disc prolapse is one of the most common causes of low back pain and sciatica, affecting individuals in their most productive years.
It occurs when the intervertebral disc herniates and compresses adjacent nerve roots, leading to varying degrees of pain, sensory disturbances, and functional impairment.
This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of patients with lumbar disc prolapse who underwent either conservative or surgical management.
Methods: This comparative observational study was conducted at National Institute of Traumatology & Orthopaedic Rehabilitation (NITOR) and the Orthopedic Department of Sylhet M.
A.
G.
Osmani Medical College Hospital, Sylhet, Bangladesh from January to December 2022.
It included 100 patients with MRI-confirmed lumbar disc prolapse, divided into two equal groups: 50 received conservative treatment (rest, analgesics, physiotherapy) and 50 underwent surgical intervention (discectomy or decompression).
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, with a p-value <0.
05 considered statistically significant.
Result: In this study of 100 patients with lumbar disc prolapse, both conservative and surgical groups showed significant improvement in pain, but surgical patients experienced greater and faster relief (VAS reduction: 6.
7 vs 4.
4; p=0.
001).
Disc extrusion and neurological deficits were more common in the surgical group.
While conservative management had a higher symptom recurrence (10% vs 4%), surgical patients experienced minor complications like wound infection (6%) and transient nerve irritation (8%).
Overall, surgical treatment provided better short-term outcomes in selected patients.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that both conservative and surgical treatments are effective for lumbar disc prolapse, but surgery provides faster and greater pain relief, especially in cases with prolonged symptoms, neurological deficits, or disc extrusion on MRI.
Conservative management remains suitable for milder cases, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment based on clinical severity and imaging findings.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Divergent Conceptualizations and Management Strategies for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Qualitative Multispecialty Study
Divergent Conceptualizations and Management Strategies for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Qualitative Multispecialty Study
Abstract
Background
Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) is the most prevalent subtype of thoracic outlet syndrome and remains one of the most controversial conditions in per...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Effect Comparison Of MIS-TLIF Under MED and Quadrant Modes in The Treatment of Lu mbar Spinal Stenosis
Background Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the common causes of low back and leg pain. Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration leads to the decrease of intervertebral height, the ...
Functional outcome of lumbar discectomy by fenestration technique in lumbar disc prolapse.
Functional outcome of lumbar discectomy by fenestration technique in lumbar disc prolapse.
Objective: To evaluate the functional recovery, particularly in in terms of pain relief and resuming work, in patients with lumbar disc prolapse treated with the fenestration techn...
Radiological Analysis of Sagittal and Cross-sectional Morphology of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Radiological Analysis of Sagittal and Cross-sectional Morphology of Congenital Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Abstract
Background Purpose This retrospective study was applied to investigate the morphology characteristics of the spine and pelvis in patients with congenital spinal s...
Lumbar Spine Distraction Exercise—Surprisingly Innovation in Conservative Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disorder
Lumbar Spine Distraction Exercise—Surprisingly Innovation in Conservative Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disorder
Introduction It is not possible to prevent the progression of degenerative disc disease of lumbar spine. Conservative treatment offered today help minimize the load coming on lumba...

