Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract B59: Bilateral oophorectomy at age 55 or older does not reduce risk of breast cancer
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Introduction: It is widely accepted that premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy (BSO) reduces the risk of breast cancer. However, recently published data suggest that BSO done after menopause may also reduce risk of breast cancer. We sought to determine the impact of postmenopausal BSO on subsequent breast cancer diagnosis in a nationally representative sample.
Methods: The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is a population-based survey conducted annually by the CDC and is designed to be representative of the non-institutionalized civilian population in the United States. We utilized data from the 2010 NHIS cancer supplement to compare breast cancer diagnosis rates in women who underwent postmenopausal BSO versus those who did not. We defined our population of interest as those women ages 65 and older who underwent BSO between the ages of 55-64. Statistical analyses were conducted using SUDAAN software.
Results: In 2010, 21707 women ages 65 and older were surveyed, representing 190,813,389 people in the population. Of these, 0.97% underwent BSO between the ages of 55-64. 4.82% of women 65 years of age and older were surveyed reported developing breast cancer after the age of 65. On univariate analysis, 8.08% of women who had undergone a BSO between the ages of 55-64 developed breast cancer after age 65; whereas 24.11% of women who had not undergone a BSO developed breast cancer after age 65 (p=0.0188). The median age at which women undergoing BSO developed cancer was 74 years, on average 14 years after their oophorectomy. Having a BSO after menopause (vs. not having a BSO) was not associated with age of menarche 11 years or younger (13.8% vs. 15.6%, p=0.3701), parity (91.9% vs. 89.2%, p=0.3793), age at first live birth < 20 (22.5% vs. 34.3%, p=0.0125), family history of a first degree relative with breast cancer (p=0.3726), body mass index 30 or above (31.6% vs. 28.2%, p=0.2811), income (p=0.2819), region (p=0.1811) or race/ethnicity (p=0.7611). However, BSO was found to be associated with higher education levels (p=0.0461), Medicare insurance (98.1% vs. 95.4%, p=0.0002) and increased ever use of HRT (50.3% vs. 25.6%, p= 0.0008). Controlling for these potential confounders on multivariate analysis, BSO was no longer associated with breast cancer after age 65 (OR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.10-1.43, p=0.1522).
Conclusion: Bilateral oophorectomy performed in women after the age of 55 does not appear to reduce the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. This patient population should continue to be counseled on other methods to reduce breast cancer risk, such as chemoprevention and weight loss.
Citation Format: Erin Hofstatter, Anees Chagpar. Bilateral oophorectomy at age 55 or older does not reduce risk of breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2013 Oct 27-30; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2013;6(11 Suppl): Abstract nr B59.
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Title: Abstract B59: Bilateral oophorectomy at age 55 or older does not reduce risk of breast cancer
Description:
Abstract
Introduction: It is widely accepted that premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy (BSO) reduces the risk of breast cancer.
However, recently published data suggest that BSO done after menopause may also reduce risk of breast cancer.
We sought to determine the impact of postmenopausal BSO on subsequent breast cancer diagnosis in a nationally representative sample.
Methods: The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is a population-based survey conducted annually by the CDC and is designed to be representative of the non-institutionalized civilian population in the United States.
We utilized data from the 2010 NHIS cancer supplement to compare breast cancer diagnosis rates in women who underwent postmenopausal BSO versus those who did not.
We defined our population of interest as those women ages 65 and older who underwent BSO between the ages of 55-64.
Statistical analyses were conducted using SUDAAN software.
Results: In 2010, 21707 women ages 65 and older were surveyed, representing 190,813,389 people in the population.
Of these, 0.
97% underwent BSO between the ages of 55-64.
4.
82% of women 65 years of age and older were surveyed reported developing breast cancer after the age of 65.
On univariate analysis, 8.
08% of women who had undergone a BSO between the ages of 55-64 developed breast cancer after age 65; whereas 24.
11% of women who had not undergone a BSO developed breast cancer after age 65 (p=0.
0188).
The median age at which women undergoing BSO developed cancer was 74 years, on average 14 years after their oophorectomy.
Having a BSO after menopause (vs.
not having a BSO) was not associated with age of menarche 11 years or younger (13.
8% vs.
15.
6%, p=0.
3701), parity (91.
9% vs.
89.
2%, p=0.
3793), age at first live birth < 20 (22.
5% vs.
34.
3%, p=0.
0125), family history of a first degree relative with breast cancer (p=0.
3726), body mass index 30 or above (31.
6% vs.
28.
2%, p=0.
2811), income (p=0.
2819), region (p=0.
1811) or race/ethnicity (p=0.
7611).
However, BSO was found to be associated with higher education levels (p=0.
0461), Medicare insurance (98.
1% vs.
95.
4%, p=0.
0002) and increased ever use of HRT (50.
3% vs.
25.
6%, p= 0.
0008).
Controlling for these potential confounders on multivariate analysis, BSO was no longer associated with breast cancer after age 65 (OR = 0.
38; 95% CI: 0.
10-1.
43, p=0.
1522).
Conclusion: Bilateral oophorectomy performed in women after the age of 55 does not appear to reduce the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.
This patient population should continue to be counseled on other methods to reduce breast cancer risk, such as chemoprevention and weight loss.
Citation Format: Erin Hofstatter, Anees Chagpar.
Bilateral oophorectomy at age 55 or older does not reduce risk of breast cancer.
[abstract].
In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2013 Oct 27-30; National Harbor, MD.
Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2013;6(11 Suppl): Abstract nr B59.
Related Results
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract
IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract OI-1: OI-1 Decoding breast cancer predisposition genes
Abstract
Women with one or more first-degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer have a two-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer. This risk i...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
PO-285 A review of effects of exercise on the quality of life in breast cancer survivors
PO-285 A review of effects of exercise on the quality of life in breast cancer survivors
Objective Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women.The number of women diagnosed with breast cancer each year is also increasing.It is also the leading cau...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...

