Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Mid-long term results after elective Impella-supported, complex high-risk procedures of percutaneous coronary intervention

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Mechanical circulatory support with percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) in complex high-risk indicated procedures percutaneous of coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) is an option for improving the haemodynamics of the patient during the intervention. There is little evidence regarding mid-long term prognosis after such procedures. Purpose We aim to describe mid-long term outcomes in patients in whom we used an Impella CP device for an elective CHIP-PCI, and identify prognostic factors for survival in our patients. Methods prospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent elective CHIP-PCI with pLVAD support after heart team discussion in our center. We performed multivariate analysis with variables highlighted in the univariate analysis including baseline characteristics, coronary anatomy, analytic and echocardiographic findings, related to survival at follow-up. Results 39 elective supported CHIP-PCI were performed from 2017 to 2024 (characteristics at table 1). At admission, 59% presented with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and 71.8% with decompensated heart failure (HF) (excluding STEMI and shocked patients). Overall in-hospital survival was 82.1% (n=32). After a median follow-up of 19 [IQR 44] months, survival was 69.2% (n=27) (causes of death in table 1). 33.3% of patients showed chronic HF at follow-up (15.4% with admission) with not statistically significant improvement in functional class compared to pre-revascularisation (mean NYHA 1,8 postPCI vs 2,6 prePCI, p=0.661) and significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (40.5% vs 28.7%, p=0.003). 15.4% received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and none advanced HF therapies. 5.1% remained with chronic angina, 15.4% were admitted for ACS requiring new revascularization. At the multivariate analysis (table 2) the independent predictors of mid-long term survival were LVEF <35% and its overall value, the presence of at least moderate mitral regurgitation, hemoglobin, EUROSCORE II and STS mortality and morbidity scales, and the occurrence of vascular complications during PCI admission. Conclusion Mid-long term outcomes after elective CHIP-PCI supported with pLVAD showed improved LVEF and lower HF than at admission, with prognostic factors related to medium to long-term survival such as LVEF, mitral regurgitation, haemoglobin, risk scales and vascular complications.Table 1  Table 2
Title: Mid-long term results after elective Impella-supported, complex high-risk procedures of percutaneous coronary intervention
Description:
Abstract Background Mechanical circulatory support with percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) in complex high-risk indicated procedures percutaneous of coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) is an option for improving the haemodynamics of the patient during the intervention.
There is little evidence regarding mid-long term prognosis after such procedures.
Purpose We aim to describe mid-long term outcomes in patients in whom we used an Impella CP device for an elective CHIP-PCI, and identify prognostic factors for survival in our patients.
Methods prospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent elective CHIP-PCI with pLVAD support after heart team discussion in our center.
We performed multivariate analysis with variables highlighted in the univariate analysis including baseline characteristics, coronary anatomy, analytic and echocardiographic findings, related to survival at follow-up.
Results 39 elective supported CHIP-PCI were performed from 2017 to 2024 (characteristics at table 1).
At admission, 59% presented with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and 71.
8% with decompensated heart failure (HF) (excluding STEMI and shocked patients).
Overall in-hospital survival was 82.
1% (n=32).
After a median follow-up of 19 [IQR 44] months, survival was 69.
2% (n=27) (causes of death in table 1).
33.
3% of patients showed chronic HF at follow-up (15.
4% with admission) with not statistically significant improvement in functional class compared to pre-revascularisation (mean NYHA 1,8 postPCI vs 2,6 prePCI, p=0.
661) and significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (40.
5% vs 28.
7%, p=0.
003).
15.
4% received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and none advanced HF therapies.
5.
1% remained with chronic angina, 15.
4% were admitted for ACS requiring new revascularization.
At the multivariate analysis (table 2) the independent predictors of mid-long term survival were LVEF <35% and its overall value, the presence of at least moderate mitral regurgitation, hemoglobin, EUROSCORE II and STS mortality and morbidity scales, and the occurrence of vascular complications during PCI admission.
Conclusion Mid-long term outcomes after elective CHIP-PCI supported with pLVAD showed improved LVEF and lower HF than at admission, with prognostic factors related to medium to long-term survival such as LVEF, mitral regurgitation, haemoglobin, risk scales and vascular complications.
Table 1  Table 2.

Related Results

Pitfalls due to improper positioning of Impella®CP device for left ventricular support: a case series
Pitfalls due to improper positioning of Impella®CP device for left ventricular support: a case series
Background: The Impella® device is a type of antegrade left ventricular assist device that includes a pump catheter designed to reside in the mid-left ventricular cavity. It has re...
Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella® Microaxial Pump in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella® Microaxial Pump in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
Acute kidney injury is one of the most frequent and prognostically relevant complications in cardiogenic shock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of th...
Thromboembolic Events In Elective vs Non-Elective Foot & Ankle Surgery
Thromboembolic Events In Elective vs Non-Elective Foot & Ankle Surgery
Category: Ankle, Arthroscopy, Hindfoot, Lesser Toes, Midfoot/Forefoot, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The occurrence of venous thromboembolisms (VTE) in the management of foo...
Ostial Right Coronary Artery Stent Loss, Stent-In-Stent Entrapment, and Subsequent Surgical Extraction
Ostial Right Coronary Artery Stent Loss, Stent-In-Stent Entrapment, and Subsequent Surgical Extraction
Abstract Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention of calcified coronary lesions is fraught with short-term and long-term risks. Judicious use of adjunct intracoronary...
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is part of a clinical syndrome consisting of acute left ventricular failure causing severe hypotension leading to inadequate organ and tissue perfusion. The ...
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
IABP Versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: “In Silico” Study
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is part of a clinical syndrome consisting of acute left ventricular failure causing severe hypotension leading to inadequate organ and tissue perfusion. The ...

Back to Top