Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Improving Gas Dehydration Using Pre-Inhibited Glycol

View through CrossRef
Abstract A report is presented on natural gas dehydration performance of dehydration units in two different plants using a pre-inhibited glycol/antifoam/pH adjuster blend versus neat glycol with periodic injection of anti-foam and pH adjuster inhibitors. To investigate the effect of using pre-inhibited glycol, two plants, each containing two gas dehydration trains (modules) were utilized such that while one train employed neat glycol with periodic chemical injection, the other employed the pre-inhibited blend with both trains running simultaneously. The two facilities were selected based on their history of poor dehydration and glycol regeneration performance and internal corrosion while using neat glycol. Performance was assessed based on resulting gas dew point, dissolved iron content, pH stability and glycol loss rate (in form of top-up frequency). In all four KPIs selected for this study, the pre-inhibited blend out performed its counterpart significantly despite initial concerns that the fixed inhibitive properties of the blend may not be robust enough to address varying operational conditions. Glycol loss rates decreased by 67% and this led to a corresponding reduction in operating cost. Gas dew point was further depressed by more than 5°C thereby restoring the two facilities to within gas export specifications in compliance with Gas Sales Agreements (GSA). pH stability remained within the buffered zone of 8.5 – 10. As evinced by the decreased loss rates, foaming did not occur at this pH range as opposed to typical experience with neat glycol. Corrosion, being inherently more chronic than acute was not measured in this trial, although there was a progressive decrease in dissolved iron content with the pre-inhibited blend. These results imply that not only can dehydration performance be increased and operating costs decreased, but also that the traditional installation of pH adjuster and antifoam injection skids may prove unnecessary for future facilities The insights made with this new pre-inhibited glycol blend approach presents strong evidence of an opportunity for significant reduction in both operating and capital costs for existing and future gas processing plants as well as a decrease in corrosion rates with prolonged plant life.
Title: Improving Gas Dehydration Using Pre-Inhibited Glycol
Description:
Abstract A report is presented on natural gas dehydration performance of dehydration units in two different plants using a pre-inhibited glycol/antifoam/pH adjuster blend versus neat glycol with periodic injection of anti-foam and pH adjuster inhibitors.
To investigate the effect of using pre-inhibited glycol, two plants, each containing two gas dehydration trains (modules) were utilized such that while one train employed neat glycol with periodic chemical injection, the other employed the pre-inhibited blend with both trains running simultaneously.
The two facilities were selected based on their history of poor dehydration and glycol regeneration performance and internal corrosion while using neat glycol.
Performance was assessed based on resulting gas dew point, dissolved iron content, pH stability and glycol loss rate (in form of top-up frequency).
In all four KPIs selected for this study, the pre-inhibited blend out performed its counterpart significantly despite initial concerns that the fixed inhibitive properties of the blend may not be robust enough to address varying operational conditions.
Glycol loss rates decreased by 67% and this led to a corresponding reduction in operating cost.
Gas dew point was further depressed by more than 5°C thereby restoring the two facilities to within gas export specifications in compliance with Gas Sales Agreements (GSA).
pH stability remained within the buffered zone of 8.
5 – 10.
As evinced by the decreased loss rates, foaming did not occur at this pH range as opposed to typical experience with neat glycol.
Corrosion, being inherently more chronic than acute was not measured in this trial, although there was a progressive decrease in dissolved iron content with the pre-inhibited blend.
These results imply that not only can dehydration performance be increased and operating costs decreased, but also that the traditional installation of pH adjuster and antifoam injection skids may prove unnecessary for future facilities The insights made with this new pre-inhibited glycol blend approach presents strong evidence of an opportunity for significant reduction in both operating and capital costs for existing and future gas processing plants as well as a decrease in corrosion rates with prolonged plant life.

Related Results

Buffering and Inhibition of Glycol in Gas Dehydration Applications: An Alternative to Amines
Buffering and Inhibition of Glycol in Gas Dehydration Applications: An Alternative to Amines
Corrosion in gas dehydration systems can be attributed to many factors, including chloride intrusion, acid gas absorption, and glycol degradation. Inhibition systems for glycol deh...
Permeation: A New Competitive Process for Offshore Gas Dehydration
Permeation: A New Competitive Process for Offshore Gas Dehydration
ABSTRACT Usual process for gas dehydration implement absorption (glycol chemical process) or adsorption (molecular sieves). The new dehydration ...
Change in reservoir structure of different lithotypes of lignite with dehydration
Change in reservoir structure of different lithotypes of lignite with dehydration
<p>Find out the changes in lignite properties accompanying dehydration will not only benefit the development of lignite CBM, but also play a guiding role in the under...
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...

Back to Top