Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Measuring open defecation in India using survey questions: evidence from a randomised survey experiment
View through CrossRef
Objectives
To investigate differences in reported open defecation between a question about latrine use or open defecation for every household member and a household-level question.
Setting
Rural India is home to most of the world’s open defecation. India’s Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2015–2016 estimates that 54% of households in rural India defecate in the open. This measure is based on a question asking about the behaviour of all household members in one question. Yet, studies in rural India find substantial open defecation among individuals living in households with latrines, suggesting that household-level questions underestimate true open defecation.
Participants
In 2018, we randomly assigned latrine-owning households in rural parts of four Indian states to receive one of two survey modules measuring sanitation behaviour. 1215 households were asked about latrine use or open defecation individually for every household member. 1216 households were asked the household-level question used in India’s DHS: what type of facility do members of the household usually use?
Results
We compare reported open defecation between households asked the individual-level questions and those asked the household-level question. Using two methods for comparing open defecation by question type, the individual-level question found 20–21 (95% CI 16 to 25 for both estimates) percentage points more open defecation than the household-level question, among all households, and 28–29 (95% CI 22 to 35 for both estimates) percentage points more open defecation among households that received assistance to construct their latrines.
Conclusions
We provide the first evidence that individual-level questions find more open defecation than household-level questions. Because reducing open defecation in India is essential to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals, and exposure to open defecation has consequences for child mortality and development, it is essential to accurately monitor its progress.
Trial registration number
Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations (5b55458ca54d1).
Title: Measuring open defecation in India using survey questions: evidence from a randomised survey experiment
Description:
Objectives
To investigate differences in reported open defecation between a question about latrine use or open defecation for every household member and a household-level question.
Setting
Rural India is home to most of the world’s open defecation.
India’s Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2015–2016 estimates that 54% of households in rural India defecate in the open.
This measure is based on a question asking about the behaviour of all household members in one question.
Yet, studies in rural India find substantial open defecation among individuals living in households with latrines, suggesting that household-level questions underestimate true open defecation.
Participants
In 2018, we randomly assigned latrine-owning households in rural parts of four Indian states to receive one of two survey modules measuring sanitation behaviour.
1215 households were asked about latrine use or open defecation individually for every household member.
1216 households were asked the household-level question used in India’s DHS: what type of facility do members of the household usually use?
Results
We compare reported open defecation between households asked the individual-level questions and those asked the household-level question.
Using two methods for comparing open defecation by question type, the individual-level question found 20–21 (95% CI 16 to 25 for both estimates) percentage points more open defecation than the household-level question, among all households, and 28–29 (95% CI 22 to 35 for both estimates) percentage points more open defecation among households that received assistance to construct their latrines.
Conclusions
We provide the first evidence that individual-level questions find more open defecation than household-level questions.
Because reducing open defecation in India is essential to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals, and exposure to open defecation has consequences for child mortality and development, it is essential to accurately monitor its progress.
Trial registration number
Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations (5b55458ca54d1).
Related Results
The prevalence, spatial distribution and geographic weighted regression of open defecation practice in sub-Saharan Africa using demographic and health survey (DHS) data
The prevalence, spatial distribution and geographic weighted regression of open defecation practice in sub-Saharan Africa using demographic and health survey (DHS) data
Background
Open defecation is a harmful and unsafe practice that contributes to environmental pollution and disproportionately affects developing nations, parti...
Childhood undernutrition mediates the relationship between open defecation with anemia among Ethiopian children: a nationally representative cross-sectional study
Childhood undernutrition mediates the relationship between open defecation with anemia among Ethiopian children: a nationally representative cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background
Poor sanitation and/or open defecation are a significant public health problem in Ethiopia, where access to improved sanitation ...
Open Defecation, Causes, Consequences and Intervention in Nigeria
Open Defecation, Causes, Consequences and Intervention in Nigeria
Fundamental components of the Sustainable Development Goals are good health and clean water. Open defecation makes this difficult. Defecating in public zones like fields, woods, co...
Current Perspectives on Cystic Echinococcosis: A Systematic Review
Current Perspectives on Cystic Echinococcosis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Hydatidosis, a zoonotic disease caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus, is a significant public health concern with notable economic impact. I...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Open Defecation among Rural Communities of Sule Tankarkar Local Government of Jigawa State, Nigeria
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Open Defecation among Rural Communities of Sule Tankarkar Local Government of Jigawa State, Nigeria
Background
The practice of unhygienic defecation in an open spaces other than toilets is what is termed as open defecation. One of the reasons for poor hygiene in Nigeria is open d...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

