Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Measuring open defecation in India using survey questions: evidence from a randomised survey experiment
View through CrossRef
Objectives
To investigate differences in reported open defecation between a question about latrine use or open defecation for every household member and a household-level question.
Setting
Rural India is home to most of the world’s open defecation. India’s Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2015–2016 estimates that 54% of households in rural India defecate in the open. This measure is based on a question asking about the behaviour of all household members in one question. Yet, studies in rural India find substantial open defecation among individuals living in households with latrines, suggesting that household-level questions underestimate true open defecation.
Participants
In 2018, we randomly assigned latrine-owning households in rural parts of four Indian states to receive one of two survey modules measuring sanitation behaviour. 1215 households were asked about latrine use or open defecation individually for every household member. 1216 households were asked the household-level question used in India’s DHS: what type of facility do members of the household usually use?
Results
We compare reported open defecation between households asked the individual-level questions and those asked the household-level question. Using two methods for comparing open defecation by question type, the individual-level question found 20–21 (95% CI 16 to 25 for both estimates) percentage points more open defecation than the household-level question, among all households, and 28–29 (95% CI 22 to 35 for both estimates) percentage points more open defecation among households that received assistance to construct their latrines.
Conclusions
We provide the first evidence that individual-level questions find more open defecation than household-level questions. Because reducing open defecation in India is essential to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals, and exposure to open defecation has consequences for child mortality and development, it is essential to accurately monitor its progress.
Trial registration number
Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations (5b55458ca54d1).
Title: Measuring open defecation in India using survey questions: evidence from a randomised survey experiment
Description:
Objectives
To investigate differences in reported open defecation between a question about latrine use or open defecation for every household member and a household-level question.
Setting
Rural India is home to most of the world’s open defecation.
India’s Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2015–2016 estimates that 54% of households in rural India defecate in the open.
This measure is based on a question asking about the behaviour of all household members in one question.
Yet, studies in rural India find substantial open defecation among individuals living in households with latrines, suggesting that household-level questions underestimate true open defecation.
Participants
In 2018, we randomly assigned latrine-owning households in rural parts of four Indian states to receive one of two survey modules measuring sanitation behaviour.
1215 households were asked about latrine use or open defecation individually for every household member.
1216 households were asked the household-level question used in India’s DHS: what type of facility do members of the household usually use?
Results
We compare reported open defecation between households asked the individual-level questions and those asked the household-level question.
Using two methods for comparing open defecation by question type, the individual-level question found 20–21 (95% CI 16 to 25 for both estimates) percentage points more open defecation than the household-level question, among all households, and 28–29 (95% CI 22 to 35 for both estimates) percentage points more open defecation among households that received assistance to construct their latrines.
Conclusions
We provide the first evidence that individual-level questions find more open defecation than household-level questions.
Because reducing open defecation in India is essential to meeting the Sustainable Development Goals, and exposure to open defecation has consequences for child mortality and development, it is essential to accurately monitor its progress.
Trial registration number
Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations (5b55458ca54d1).
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Prevalence of Open Defecation Practice and Associated Factors Among Households in Geshiyaro Project Implementation Sites in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
Prevalence of Open Defecation Practice and Associated Factors Among Households in Geshiyaro Project Implementation Sites in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background: Open defecation is a significant global challenge, impacting public health, environmental sanitation, and social well-being, especially in low- and middle-income countr...
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
This study explores the enigma of happiness inequality between India and Pakistan, despite India’s economic prowess. Employing inequality regression models, the study pinpoints cru...
Assessment of results of suture rectopexy technique for obstructed defecation syndrome, analysis of recurrent factors
Assessment of results of suture rectopexy technique for obstructed defecation syndrome, analysis of recurrent factors
Abstract
Introduction: Based on the obliterative suture technique or stapled transanal rectal resection procedure (STARR technique), Nguyen Trung Vinh introduced Suture Rectopexy T...
Painful Defecation and Fecal Soiling in Children
Painful Defecation and Fecal Soiling in Children
Fecal soiling is a common complaint among school-age children. The fecal soiling is often accompanied by chronic constipation and so-called "idiopathic," "functional," or "psychoge...
Quantification of defecation frequency in cats with and without chronic kidney disease
Quantification of defecation frequency in cats with and without chronic kidney disease
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to objectively measure defecation frequency in cats with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD). Cats with CKD are at higher ...

