Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Impact of inotropic therapy on mortality in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Introduction
Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicates 3-13% of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases, with a mortality rate of approximately 40% within the first 30 days, making it the leading cause of death in AMI patients. AMI accounts for 81% of CS cases. Pharmacological therapies, including inotropic agents with vasoactive and vasopressor effects, are commonly administered in these cases.
Purpose
This study aimed to examine the relationship between inotropic therapy administered to patients with CS post-AMI and their mortality outcomes.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study from March 20 to October 20, 2024. Patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (STEMI or NSTEMI) were evaluated, and those who developed CS were included in the study. Participants were categorized into two groups based on outcomes: a mortality group and a survival group.
Results
Among 1,166 patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome at the Clinic of Cardiology over the seven-month study period, 86 (7.4%) developed CS. Of these, 44 patients (51%) died. Table 1 compares the two groups with respect to the inotropic agents administered. Significant differences were observed in the number of inotropic agents used, with 52% of survivors receiving only one inotropic agent, compared to 20.5% in the mortality group (p=0.002). Additionally, patients who received noradrenaline more frequently and at higher doses were predominantly in the mortality group, as shown in Table 1. Variables with statistical significance were included in a multiple regression model (Table 2a), which showed statistical significance (p=0.02), indicating that patients receiving more than one inotropic agent, or noradrenaline at higher doses, were at a higher risk of mortality. Noradrenaline dose was identified as an independent predictor of mortality (Table 2b).
Conclusions
In our center, approximately 7% of patients with acute coronary syndrome develop CS, with nearly half resulting in death. Patients receiving a single inotropic agent have a higher survival chance, whereas those receiving noradrenaline, especially at higher doses, are at an elevated risk of mortality. This may reflect a trend of treating more critically ill patients with aggressive therapy or could indicate an effect of the treatment itself. Larger studies are needed to clarify this finding.
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Impact of inotropic therapy on mortality in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction
Description:
Abstract
Introduction
Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicates 3-13% of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases, with a mortality rate of approximately 40% within the first 30 days, making it the leading cause of death in AMI patients.
AMI accounts for 81% of CS cases.
Pharmacological therapies, including inotropic agents with vasoactive and vasopressor effects, are commonly administered in these cases.
Purpose
This study aimed to examine the relationship between inotropic therapy administered to patients with CS post-AMI and their mortality outcomes.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study from March 20 to October 20, 2024.
Patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome (STEMI or NSTEMI) were evaluated, and those who developed CS were included in the study.
Participants were categorized into two groups based on outcomes: a mortality group and a survival group.
Results
Among 1,166 patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome at the Clinic of Cardiology over the seven-month study period, 86 (7.
4%) developed CS.
Of these, 44 patients (51%) died.
Table 1 compares the two groups with respect to the inotropic agents administered.
Significant differences were observed in the number of inotropic agents used, with 52% of survivors receiving only one inotropic agent, compared to 20.
5% in the mortality group (p=0.
002).
Additionally, patients who received noradrenaline more frequently and at higher doses were predominantly in the mortality group, as shown in Table 1.
Variables with statistical significance were included in a multiple regression model (Table 2a), which showed statistical significance (p=0.
02), indicating that patients receiving more than one inotropic agent, or noradrenaline at higher doses, were at a higher risk of mortality.
Noradrenaline dose was identified as an independent predictor of mortality (Table 2b).
Conclusions
In our center, approximately 7% of patients with acute coronary syndrome develop CS, with nearly half resulting in death.
Patients receiving a single inotropic agent have a higher survival chance, whereas those receiving noradrenaline, especially at higher doses, are at an elevated risk of mortality.
This may reflect a trend of treating more critically ill patients with aggressive therapy or could indicate an effect of the treatment itself.
Larger studies are needed to clarify this finding.
Related Results
Differences in population characteristics and prognosis between cardiogenic shock in right ventricular infarction and anterior infarction
Differences in population characteristics and prognosis between cardiogenic shock in right ventricular infarction and anterior infarction
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
Introduction
...
Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes of Acute Noncardiac Organ Failure among Non-Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis
Prevalence and Clinical Outcomes of Acute Noncardiac Organ Failure among Non-Acute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis
AbstractBackgroundNoncardiac organ failure often complicates cardiogenic shock (CS). The results of cardiogenic shock caused by noncardiac organ failures in patients without acute ...
Frequency of cardiogenic shock in acute inferior wall myocardial infraction.
Frequency of cardiogenic shock in acute inferior wall myocardial infraction.
Objective: The aim of the study to determine the frequency of cardiogenic shock and its associated factors in patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction in tertiary care hos...
What is the evidence for IABP in STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock?
What is the evidence for IABP in STEMI with and without cardiogenic shock?
Intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) is the most widely used left ventricular support device in a variety of indications. This review focuses on the current literature and discusses the...
THE CLINICAL VALUE OF MYOCARDIAL ENZYMES AND TROPONIN I COMBINED DETECTION FOR EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
THE CLINICAL VALUE OF MYOCARDIAL ENZYMES AND TROPONIN I COMBINED DETECTION FOR EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Objectives
To investigate the clinical value of myocardial enzymes and troponin I combined detection for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.
...
Cardiogenic shock: role of invasive cardiology
Cardiogenic shock: role of invasive cardiology
Purpose of review
Early revascularization significantly improved the outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Nevertheles...
Venoarterial Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock Complicated from an Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Overview and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
Venoarterial Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock Complicated from an Acute Myocardial Infarction: An Overview and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis
Background: Cardiogenic shock remains a significant cause of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome, despite early interventions, such as coronary revascularization. Me...
Refractory Shock. Casuistics
Refractory Shock. Casuistics
Shock Syndrome is an acute progressive circulatory insufficiency where the Heart is unable to circulate the blood in time unit, for supplying with O2 to the cells and to take out f...

