Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Is Tourniquet Use Necessary for Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background To determine the necessity of tourniquet use in arthroscopic meniscal repair by comparing outcomes including arthroscopic visibility, operative time, postoperative pain and subjective function of the knee joint. Methods This was a retrospective, single-centre, single-surgeon study. A total of 148 patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair were allocated to the tourniquet group (n=82) or the nontourniquet group (n=66). The primary outcome measures were arthroscopic visibility and operative time. The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain measured by a visual analogue scale and subjective function of the knee joint measured by The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores. Results The 2 groups did not differ in terms of age, male‒female ratio, body mass index, or operative side. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding arthroscopic visibility and operative time. At 1 week postoperatively, the VAS score and Lysholm score of the nontourniquet group were better than those of the tourniquet group (P<0.05). The VAS score, Lysholm score, and IKDC score at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively were significantly improved compared to the preoperative status in both groups (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in these indexes between the two groups at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). Conclusions Tourniquet use for arthroscopic meniscal repair does not affect primary outcome or secondary outcomes. Based on the results of the analysis, the use of a tourniquet is no longer advisable for routine arthroscopic meniscal repair. Level of Evidence:LEVEL III
Title: Is Tourniquet Use Necessary for Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair
Description:
Abstract Background To determine the necessity of tourniquet use in arthroscopic meniscal repair by comparing outcomes including arthroscopic visibility, operative time, postoperative pain and subjective function of the knee joint.
Methods This was a retrospective, single-centre, single-surgeon study.
A total of 148 patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair were allocated to the tourniquet group (n=82) or the nontourniquet group (n=66).
The primary outcome measures were arthroscopic visibility and operative time.
The secondary outcomes were postoperative pain measured by a visual analogue scale and subjective function of the knee joint measured by The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores.
Results The 2 groups did not differ in terms of age, male‒female ratio, body mass index, or operative side.
There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding arthroscopic visibility and operative time.
At 1 week postoperatively, the VAS score and Lysholm score of the nontourniquet group were better than those of the tourniquet group (P<0.
05).
The VAS score, Lysholm score, and IKDC score at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively were significantly improved compared to the preoperative status in both groups (P < 0.
05).
However, there was no significant difference in these indexes between the two groups at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively (P > 0.
05).
Conclusions Tourniquet use for arthroscopic meniscal repair does not affect primary outcome or secondary outcomes.
Based on the results of the analysis, the use of a tourniquet is no longer advisable for routine arthroscopic meniscal repair.
Level of Evidence:LEVEL III.

Related Results

Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique)
Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair with Extrusion Repair (Centralization Technique)
Background: Meniscal extrusion is a phenomenon in which a degenerative posterior horn tear, radial tear, or root tear results in displacement of the body of the meniscu...
Acceptability of Ankle Tourniquet Use in Midfoot and Forefoot Surgery: Audit of 1000 Cases
Acceptability of Ankle Tourniquet Use in Midfoot and Forefoot Surgery: Audit of 1000 Cases
Background: While use of a thigh tourniquet with general anesthesia is widely accepted, use of an ankle tourniquet in the awake patient is more controversial. I...
Functional and Radiological Outcome of Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair for Discoid Meniscus
Functional and Radiological Outcome of Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair for Discoid Meniscus
Introduction: Discoid meniscus (DM) is a congenital anomaly of the meniscus form that predisposes individuals to symptomatic DM, especially in the lateral meniscus. Arthroscopic me...
Meniscal Root Repairs
Meniscal Root Repairs
Meniscal root tears are substantial injuries that usually require surgical management. If left untreated, meniscal root tears can lead to the rapid onset of osteoarthritis similar ...
Analysis of curative effect of low position tourniquet in calcaneal fracture surgery
Analysis of curative effect of low position tourniquet in calcaneal fracture surgery
Abstract This study was designed to investigate the role and curative effect of low position tourniquet in calcaneal fracture surgery. We studied a total of 42 calcaneal fr...
Uterine Isthmus Tourniquet during Abdominal Myomectomy: Support or Hazard? A Randomized Double-Blind Trial
Uterine Isthmus Tourniquet during Abdominal Myomectomy: Support or Hazard? A Randomized Double-Blind Trial
<b><i>Background and Objectives:</i></b> A tourniquet has been suggested as a useful means of reducing massive hemorrhage during myomectomy. However, it is ...

Back to Top