Javascript must be enabled to continue!
P050: How aware is safe enough? Situational awareness is higher in safer teams doing simulated emergency airway cases
View through CrossRef
Introduction: Situational Awareness is the ability to identify, process, and comprehend the critical elements of information about the patient condition, stability, the operational environment and an appropriate clinical course. The Situational Awareness Global Assessment Tool (SAGAT) is a validated tool for measuring situational awareness. The SAGAT tool was measured during a series of standardized high fidelity advanced airway management simulations in multidisciplinary teams in New Brunswick Emergency Departments delivered by two simulation programs Methods: Thirty eight simulated emergency airway cases were performed in situ in Emergency Departments and in learning centers in Southern New Brunswick from September 2015 to October 2017. Eight standardized cases were used whose educational objectives were to develop the optimization of critically ill patients prior to induction, to deliver patient-centered anesthesia and to choose an appropriate airway strategy. Learner profiles collected. Cases were divided into two groups; those that contained critical errors and those that did not based on video assessment. Critical errors were defined as failure of 1) Oxygenation 2) Shock correction 3) Induction dose estimation 4) Choice of airway management paradigm. The SAGAT has a maximum score of 13 and was assessed by research nurses after each case for all participants. SAGAT scores were non-normally distributed, so results were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges. Mann Whitney U tests were used to calculate statistical significance. Results: Results. Of the 38 cases, 14 contained one more critical errors. The median SAGAT score in the group that contained critical errors was 8 +/− 2 (IQR). The median SAGAT Score in the group that contained no critical errors was 11 +/− 2 (IQR). The median scores we significantly different with a p-value of 0.02. Conclusion: In this study in simulated emergency cases, higher SAGAT scores were associated with teams leaders that did not commit safety critical errors. This work is the initial analysis to develop standards for Simulated team performance in Emergency Department teams.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: P050: How aware is safe enough? Situational awareness is higher in safer teams doing simulated emergency airway cases
Description:
Introduction: Situational Awareness is the ability to identify, process, and comprehend the critical elements of information about the patient condition, stability, the operational environment and an appropriate clinical course.
The Situational Awareness Global Assessment Tool (SAGAT) is a validated tool for measuring situational awareness.
The SAGAT tool was measured during a series of standardized high fidelity advanced airway management simulations in multidisciplinary teams in New Brunswick Emergency Departments delivered by two simulation programs Methods: Thirty eight simulated emergency airway cases were performed in situ in Emergency Departments and in learning centers in Southern New Brunswick from September 2015 to October 2017.
Eight standardized cases were used whose educational objectives were to develop the optimization of critically ill patients prior to induction, to deliver patient-centered anesthesia and to choose an appropriate airway strategy.
Learner profiles collected.
Cases were divided into two groups; those that contained critical errors and those that did not based on video assessment.
Critical errors were defined as failure of 1) Oxygenation 2) Shock correction 3) Induction dose estimation 4) Choice of airway management paradigm.
The SAGAT has a maximum score of 13 and was assessed by research nurses after each case for all participants.
SAGAT scores were non-normally distributed, so results were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges.
Mann Whitney U tests were used to calculate statistical significance.
Results: Results.
Of the 38 cases, 14 contained one more critical errors.
The median SAGAT score in the group that contained critical errors was 8 +/− 2 (IQR).
The median SAGAT Score in the group that contained no critical errors was 11 +/− 2 (IQR).
The median scores we significantly different with a p-value of 0.
02.
Conclusion: In this study in simulated emergency cases, higher SAGAT scores were associated with teams leaders that did not commit safety critical errors.
This work is the initial analysis to develop standards for Simulated team performance in Emergency Department teams.
Related Results
Pediatric Difficult Airway Management: Assessment and Intervention
Pediatric Difficult Airway Management: Assessment and Intervention
Background
: Pediatric airways exemplify the adage that children are not merely small adults. Their airway anatomical differences are markedly different than th...
Situational Awareness – Key Safety Factor For The Officer Of The Watch
Situational Awareness – Key Safety Factor For The Officer Of The Watch
One of the main causes of many maritime accidents are errors caused by the human element. Analysis of many maritime accidents at sea shows that situational awareness is one of the ...
DIFFICULT AIRWAY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN KARACHI’S TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS
DIFFICULT AIRWAY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN KARACHI’S TERTIARY CARE HOSPITALS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSIS
Background: Effective management of difficult airways is essential in anesthesia practice, particularly in critical “cannot intubate, cannot ventilate” (CICV) situations, which can...
Airway Management Strategies during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in a South African Private Emergency Medical Service: A Retrospective Review
Airway Management Strategies during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in a South African Private Emergency Medical Service: A Retrospective Review
Abstract
Background
Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) remains a major cause of mortality globally, with survival dependent on early, high-quality resuscitation...
Airway management practices among emergency physicians
Airway management practices among emergency physicians
OBJECTIVES:
Emergency airway management is an integral part of patient stabilization. It is an essential skill for an emergency physician to master. There is a paucity ...
A clinical survey of the current status of difficult airway information dissemination
A clinical survey of the current status of difficult airway information dissemination
Abstract
Background
Difficult airway is one of the greatest challenges faced by anesthesiologists and is a potential risk factor for increased fatality in patients. To date...
The Clinical and Subclinical Features of Patients with Airway Foreign Body at the Endoscopy Department, National Otorhinolaryngology Hospital of Vietnam from 08/2018 to 02/2020
The Clinical and Subclinical Features of Patients with Airway Foreign Body at the Endoscopy Department, National Otorhinolaryngology Hospital of Vietnam from 08/2018 to 02/2020
This study describes clinical and subclinical features of 30 patients with airway foreign body at the Endoscopy Department, National Otorhinolaryngology Hospital of Vietnam from Au...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...

