Javascript must be enabled to continue!
P050: How aware is safe enough? Situational awareness is higher in safer teams doing simulated emergency airway cases
View through CrossRef
Introduction: Situational Awareness is the ability to identify, process, and comprehend the critical elements of information about the patient condition, stability, the operational environment and an appropriate clinical course. The Situational Awareness Global Assessment Tool (SAGAT) is a validated tool for measuring situational awareness. The SAGAT tool was measured during a series of standardized high fidelity advanced airway management simulations in multidisciplinary teams in New Brunswick Emergency Departments delivered by two simulation programs Methods: Thirty eight simulated emergency airway cases were performed in situ in Emergency Departments and in learning centers in Southern New Brunswick from September 2015 to October 2017. Eight standardized cases were used whose educational objectives were to develop the optimization of critically ill patients prior to induction, to deliver patient-centered anesthesia and to choose an appropriate airway strategy. Learner profiles collected. Cases were divided into two groups; those that contained critical errors and those that did not based on video assessment. Critical errors were defined as failure of 1) Oxygenation 2) Shock correction 3) Induction dose estimation 4) Choice of airway management paradigm. The SAGAT has a maximum score of 13 and was assessed by research nurses after each case for all participants. SAGAT scores were non-normally distributed, so results were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges. Mann Whitney U tests were used to calculate statistical significance. Results: Results. Of the 38 cases, 14 contained one more critical errors. The median SAGAT score in the group that contained critical errors was 8 +/− 2 (IQR). The median SAGAT Score in the group that contained no critical errors was 11 +/− 2 (IQR). The median scores we significantly different with a p-value of 0.02. Conclusion: In this study in simulated emergency cases, higher SAGAT scores were associated with teams leaders that did not commit safety critical errors. This work is the initial analysis to develop standards for Simulated team performance in Emergency Department teams.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: P050: How aware is safe enough? Situational awareness is higher in safer teams doing simulated emergency airway cases
Description:
Introduction: Situational Awareness is the ability to identify, process, and comprehend the critical elements of information about the patient condition, stability, the operational environment and an appropriate clinical course.
The Situational Awareness Global Assessment Tool (SAGAT) is a validated tool for measuring situational awareness.
The SAGAT tool was measured during a series of standardized high fidelity advanced airway management simulations in multidisciplinary teams in New Brunswick Emergency Departments delivered by two simulation programs Methods: Thirty eight simulated emergency airway cases were performed in situ in Emergency Departments and in learning centers in Southern New Brunswick from September 2015 to October 2017.
Eight standardized cases were used whose educational objectives were to develop the optimization of critically ill patients prior to induction, to deliver patient-centered anesthesia and to choose an appropriate airway strategy.
Learner profiles collected.
Cases were divided into two groups; those that contained critical errors and those that did not based on video assessment.
Critical errors were defined as failure of 1) Oxygenation 2) Shock correction 3) Induction dose estimation 4) Choice of airway management paradigm.
The SAGAT has a maximum score of 13 and was assessed by research nurses after each case for all participants.
SAGAT scores were non-normally distributed, so results were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges.
Mann Whitney U tests were used to calculate statistical significance.
Results: Results.
Of the 38 cases, 14 contained one more critical errors.
The median SAGAT score in the group that contained critical errors was 8 +/− 2 (IQR).
The median SAGAT Score in the group that contained no critical errors was 11 +/− 2 (IQR).
The median scores we significantly different with a p-value of 0.
02.
Conclusion: In this study in simulated emergency cases, higher SAGAT scores were associated with teams leaders that did not commit safety critical errors.
This work is the initial analysis to develop standards for Simulated team performance in Emergency Department teams.
Related Results
Pediatric Difficult Airway Management: Assessment and Intervention
Pediatric Difficult Airway Management: Assessment and Intervention
Background: Pediatric airways exemplify the adage that children are not merely small adults. Their airway anatomical differences are markedly different than that of an adult system...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
A clinical survey of the current status of difficult airway information dissemination
A clinical survey of the current status of difficult airway information dissemination
Abstract
Background
Difficult airway is one of the greatest challenges faced by anesthesiologists and is a potential risk factor for increased fatality in patients. To date...
Retinitis Pigmentosa
Retinitis Pigmentosa
In studying the cases with typical and atypical pigmentary degeneration of the retina we strived to analyse in the clinical material all ophthalmoscopic and ocular changes together...
P049: Changes in situational awareness of emergency teams in simulated trauma cases using an RSI checklist
P049: Changes in situational awareness of emergency teams in simulated trauma cases using an RSI checklist
Introduction: Situational awareness (SA) is the team understanding patient stability, presenting illness and future clinical course. Losing SA has been shown to increase safety-cri...
Correlation between sestrin2 expression and airway remodeling in COPD
Correlation between sestrin2 expression and airway remodeling in COPD
Abstract
Background. Airway remodeling is a major pathological characteristic of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and has been shown to be associated with oxid...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Low-intensity aerobic exercise training attenuates airway inflammation and remodeling in a rat model of steroid-resistant asthma
Low-intensity aerobic exercise training attenuates airway inflammation and remodeling in a rat model of steroid-resistant asthma
Background
Aerobic exercise can improve symptoms, reduce airway inflammation, and even ameliorate airway remodeling in asthmatic animals and patients. However, previous...

