Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Extending sampling approaches for great crested newt ( Triturus cristatus ) eDNA monitoring
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring has been used for great crested newt (
Triturus cristatus
) survey in the UK since the publication of a Defra-funded trial in 2014. If eDNA results are to be used in support of a great crested newt licence, surveys must be performed during a 76-day survey window (15 April – 30 June) to coincide with peak great crested newt activity, and must follow the approved ethanol precipitation protocol. However, eDNA detection is possible in other months and filtration may be a more effective method of eDNA capture.
We investigated whether the great crested newt eDNA survey season could be extended and filtration could be used for great crested newt eDNA capture by reviewing the available evidence and conducting a field study from April to October 2022. Paired water samples for ethanol precipitation and filtration were collected from 25 ponds once a month, resulting in 124 samples of each type. All samples (N = 248) were analysed with the approved great crested newt quantitative PCR assay.
Our results indicate that great crested newts can be reliably detected using both eDNA capture methods from April to August, with detection rates decreasing in September and October. Great crested newt eDNA detection was comparable or higher with filtration than ethanol precipitation.
Practical implication.
Acceptance of filtration for great crested newt eDNA surveys could allow more water to be processed for robust and reliable estimates of great crested newt presence. Extending the great crested newt eDNA survey season to August could allow more waterbodies to be surveyed for great crested newt presence (but not absence), and identification of sites that provide important habitat for great crested newts outside of the breeding season. This would also remove logistical challenges and costs associated with completing sampling within 11 weeks and laboratory analysis within 10 working days from sample receipt. Furthermore, great crested newt eDNA surveys could be more frequently carried out alongside monitoring for other species, which are typically surveyed from April to September/October or year-round with conventional methods or eDNA surveys using filtration. This could enable infrastructure projects to develop more effective mitigation measures as well as reduce time required from surveyors and survey costs.
Title: Extending sampling approaches for great crested newt (
Triturus cristatus
) eDNA monitoring
Description:
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring has been used for great crested newt (
Triturus cristatus
) survey in the UK since the publication of a Defra-funded trial in 2014.
If eDNA results are to be used in support of a great crested newt licence, surveys must be performed during a 76-day survey window (15 April – 30 June) to coincide with peak great crested newt activity, and must follow the approved ethanol precipitation protocol.
However, eDNA detection is possible in other months and filtration may be a more effective method of eDNA capture.
We investigated whether the great crested newt eDNA survey season could be extended and filtration could be used for great crested newt eDNA capture by reviewing the available evidence and conducting a field study from April to October 2022.
Paired water samples for ethanol precipitation and filtration were collected from 25 ponds once a month, resulting in 124 samples of each type.
All samples (N = 248) were analysed with the approved great crested newt quantitative PCR assay.
Our results indicate that great crested newts can be reliably detected using both eDNA capture methods from April to August, with detection rates decreasing in September and October.
Great crested newt eDNA detection was comparable or higher with filtration than ethanol precipitation.
Practical implication.
Acceptance of filtration for great crested newt eDNA surveys could allow more water to be processed for robust and reliable estimates of great crested newt presence.
Extending the great crested newt eDNA survey season to August could allow more waterbodies to be surveyed for great crested newt presence (but not absence), and identification of sites that provide important habitat for great crested newts outside of the breeding season.
This would also remove logistical challenges and costs associated with completing sampling within 11 weeks and laboratory analysis within 10 working days from sample receipt.
Furthermore, great crested newt eDNA surveys could be more frequently carried out alongside monitoring for other species, which are typically surveyed from April to September/October or year-round with conventional methods or eDNA surveys using filtration.
This could enable infrastructure projects to develop more effective mitigation measures as well as reduce time required from surveyors and survey costs.
Related Results
The courtship display of the marbled newt
The courtship display of the marbled newt
AbstractThe sexual behaviour of the marbled newt (Triturus marmoratus) is similar to that of the crested newt (T. cristatus), but differs from it by a different temporal patterning...
eDNA Metabarcoding Benchmarked towards Conventional Survey Methods in Amphibian Monitoring
eDNA Metabarcoding Benchmarked towards Conventional Survey Methods in Amphibian Monitoring
A keystone in protection work is accurate and thorough the monitoring of amphibian species, and the currently applied conventional survey methods are invasive, time-consuming, and ...
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals
Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is largely used to survey aquatic communities, but ca...
Complex interactions between environmental DNA (eDNA) state and water chemistries on eDNA persistence suggested by meta-analyses
Complex interactions between environmental DNA (eDNA) state and water chemistries on eDNA persistence suggested by meta-analyses
Understanding the processes of environmental DNA (eDNA) persistence and
degradation is essential to determine the spatiotemporal scale of eDNA
signals and accurately estimate speci...
Monitoring newt communities in urban area using eDNA metabarcoding
Monitoring newt communities in urban area using eDNA metabarcoding
Newts are amphibians commonly present in small ponds or garden pools in urban areas. They are protected in many countries and their presence is monitored through visual observation...
Habitat Matrix Effects on Pond Occupancy in Newts
Habitat Matrix Effects on Pond Occupancy in Newts
Abstract:
In farmlands, the population viability of many amphibians is suspected to depend on the resistance the matrix of crop fields presents to movements bet...
Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling strategies influence estimates of freshwater fish eDNA concentrations
Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling strategies influence estimates of freshwater fish eDNA concentrations
ABSTRACT
Quantifying
in-situ
environmental DNA (eDNA) concentrations is increasingly used to infer fish abund...
Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Detects Predators at Higher Rates Than Electrofishing
Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Detects Predators at Higher Rates Than Electrofishing
ABSTRACTThere are numerous downsides and risks associated with electrofishing; hence, environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is becoming increasingly common in aquatic ecological s...

