The acanthocyte-echinocyte differential

Acanthocytes are a distinct structural (and functional) entity compared to echinocytes. The differential, however, is not always clear. A summary of morphologic characteristics to make a clear distinction is provided, using the blood of a rare neurologic disease with acanthocytic transformation of red blood cells. Chorea-acanthocytosis (ChAc) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder correlated with a deformation of the red blood cells (RBCs) called acanthocytosis (from acantho- “thorn”, “spur cell”). ChAc is part of a clinical syndrome group called Neuroacanthocytosis syndromes (NA), first described in 1960 as “Levine-Critchley syndrome” [1]. ChAc is an autosomal recessive choreo-athetoid movement disorder with orofacial dyskinesia and dementia, while the second common clinical disorder of the same group, the McLeod syndrome(MLS), is an X-linked chronic haemolysis with chorea, peripheral neuropathy and myopathy. Other subtypes of the NA include: pantothenate kinase associated neurodegeneration(PKAN), Huntington’s disease-like 2(HDL 2) and the variant hypoprebetalipoproteinemia acanthocytosis retinitis pigmentosa pallidal degeneration syndrome(HARP) [2, 3]. Neuroanatomical changes are present in form of extensive neuronal loss and gliosis of the caudatum, the corpus striatum and the pallidum and peripheral axonal neuropathy [4, 5]. The concomitant neuronal degeneration and erythrocyte membrane abnormality may have a common proteic source [6], distinct from the lipidic source of acanthocytes of other aetiologies (M. Anderson, abetalipoproteinaemia, hypobetalipoproteinemia, alcoholic liver cirrhosis, anorexia nervosa) [7]. These abnormalities may reside on defects of the band 3 protein, involved in the regulation of the intracellular pH in neurons and major proteic component in the membrane of erythrocytes. This defect leads to disturbances in various membrane functions: anion transport, anchoring with cytoskeleton, enzyme-binding, age-related vesiculation and immune-signalling for removal of the old erythrocytes from the circulation [8]. Microscope images of peripheral blood smears, especially scanning electron microscopic ones, are reported as useful tools in investigating NA, while only genetic testing can confirm its diagnosis [4, 9, 10]. Our scanning electron microscopic investigation makes it possible to objectify the morphology of RBC in ChAc in detail, in fact the abnormality of the acanthocytic-transformed erythrocytes is very pronounced, sometimes grotesque. This is an indication that acanthocytes are a distinct structural (and functional) entity compared to echinocytes (from echino-“porcupine”, “burr cell”) [11], a differential which sometimes has been confused. Summarizing, acanthocytes are deformed red blood cells characterised by few, irregularly distributed spikes (“spiculae”) in a blood smear where also echinocytes are present in great quantity. Echinocytes, to the other hand, are characterised by many spiculae regularly distributed on the membrane surface of the erythrocyte, mainly in blood smear without acanthocytes [7]. We could observe the presence of grotesque membrane abnormalities in acanthocytes compared to echinocytes, where the forms of the spiculae are limited to different degrees of the spiny character. Acanthocytic forms, in fact, are determined by a structural pathologic membrane defect [6, 7], whereas echinocytic forms can be caused and reversed by pH, osmolarity, biochemical and even electrical variations [12–15]. This short communication aims to make the readers aware of the potential trap which echinocytes can cause when looking for acanthocytes. This is particularly true in the case of ChAc, which diagnosis, however, relies on clinical investigations and genetic testing, in particular when light- and electron microscopy are not available.