Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Can ChatGPT-3.5 Pass a Medical Exam? A Systematic Review of ChatGPT's Performance in Academic Testing
View through CrossRef
OBJECTIVE We, therefore, aim to conduct a systematic review to assess the academic potential of ChatGPT-3.5, along with its strengths and limitations when giving medical exams. METHOD Following PRISMA guidelines, a systemic search of the literature was performed using electronic databases PUBMED/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. Articles from their inception till April 4, 2023, were queried. A formal narrative analysis was conducted by systematically arranging similarities and differences between individual findings together. RESULTS After rigorous screening, 12 articles underwent this review. All the selected papers assessed the academic performance of ChatGPT-3.5. One study compared the performance of ChatGPT-3.5 with the performance of ChatGPT-4 when giving a medical exam. Overall, ChatGPT performed well in 4 tests, averaged in 4 tests, and performed badly in 4 tests. ChatGPT's performance was directly proportional to the level of the questions’ difficulty but was unremarkable on whether the questions were binary, descriptive, or MCQ-based. ChatGPT's explanation, reasoning, memory, and accuracy were remarkably good, whereas it failed to understand image-based questions, and lacked insight and critical thinking. CONCLUSION ChatGPT-3.5 performed satisfactorily in the exams it took as an examinee. However, there is a need for future related studies to fully explore the potential of ChatGPT in medical education.
Title: Can ChatGPT-3.5 Pass a Medical Exam? A Systematic Review of ChatGPT's Performance in Academic Testing
Description:
OBJECTIVE We, therefore, aim to conduct a systematic review to assess the academic potential of ChatGPT-3.
5, along with its strengths and limitations when giving medical exams.
METHOD Following PRISMA guidelines, a systemic search of the literature was performed using electronic databases PUBMED/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane.
Articles from their inception till April 4, 2023, were queried.
A formal narrative analysis was conducted by systematically arranging similarities and differences between individual findings together.
RESULTS After rigorous screening, 12 articles underwent this review.
All the selected papers assessed the academic performance of ChatGPT-3.
5.
One study compared the performance of ChatGPT-3.
5 with the performance of ChatGPT-4 when giving a medical exam.
Overall, ChatGPT performed well in 4 tests, averaged in 4 tests, and performed badly in 4 tests.
ChatGPT's performance was directly proportional to the level of the questions’ difficulty but was unremarkable on whether the questions were binary, descriptive, or MCQ-based.
ChatGPT's explanation, reasoning, memory, and accuracy were remarkably good, whereas it failed to understand image-based questions, and lacked insight and critical thinking.
CONCLUSION ChatGPT-3.
5 performed satisfactorily in the exams it took as an examinee.
However, there is a need for future related studies to fully explore the potential of ChatGPT in medical education.
Related Results
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
Many researchers utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to aid their research endeavors. This study seeks to assess and contrast the performance of three sophis...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Comparison of ChatGPT 3.5 Turbo and Human Performance in taking the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma (EBOD) Exam
Comparison of ChatGPT 3.5 Turbo and Human Performance in taking the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma (EBOD) Exam
Abstract
Background/Objectives:
This paper aims to assess ChatGPT’s performance in answering European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma (EBOD) examination papers and to compa...
CHATGPT ASSISTANCE ON BIOCHEMISTRY LEARNING OUTCOMES OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS
CHATGPT ASSISTANCE ON BIOCHEMISTRY LEARNING OUTCOMES OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS
This research investigates the effect of ChatGPT on the learning outcomes of pre-service biology teachers. Sampling was done by purposive sampling in class A (treated with ChatGPT)...
ChatGPT: "To be or not to be" ... in academic research. The human mind's analytical rigor and capacity to discriminate between AI bots' truths and hallucinations
ChatGPT: "To be or not to be" ... in academic research. The human mind's analytical rigor and capacity to discriminate between AI bots' truths and hallucinations
Background. ChatGPT can generate increasingly realistic language, but the correctness and integrity of implementing these models in scientific papers remain unknown.
Recently publ...
Exploring Teacher Attitudes Towards ChatGPT: A comprehensive Review
Exploring Teacher Attitudes Towards ChatGPT: A comprehensive Review
This article explores teachers' attitudes towards ChatGPT, a language model created by OpenAI, and its potential implications for education. ChatGPT employs sophisticated machine l...

