Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Heterochrony
View through CrossRef
AbstractHeterochrony has often been proposed as a leading mechanism for macroevolutionary change in morphology of organisms, based simply on a relative shift in the timing of events during embryonic development in the evolving organisms. Its most recent formulation was in Gould's ‘clock model’. Such timing shifts were seen as being controlled genetically (by ‘rate genes’) or by hormones (such as thyroxine). Heterochrony has much in common with the concept of allometry. The concept originated in the context of the idea of recapitulation where embryonic development was interpreted as a repetition of the organism's evolutionary history but in accelerated form; deviations from this recapitulation were identified as instances of heterochrony. In a later version used to explain macroevolutionary change (paedomorphosis), a new adult morphology is derived from ancestral larval forms by truncation of ancestral adult stages. However, it is difficult to see how genuine structural novelty can be explained, given that timing changes during development can in themselves do no more than redeploy preexisting characters. The explanatory value of the concept of heterochrony is increasingly questioned; at best it only indirectly relates to, or identifies, specific underlying mechanisms. It is in effect a form of redescription.Key Concepts:The extension across time of stages and component events in embryonic development is an inherent feature because development involves a cumulative succession of cell multiplication and differentiative processes, all starting from the single cell stage of the egg.The controversial concept of heterochrony attempts to characterise a mechanism controlling variations in developmental timing of the embryo or its component parts, which could potentially mediate and explain the evolution of new morphologies.Neoteny is a paradigm example of heterochrony, in which the adult morphology of a species is thought to be derived from the larval form of an ancestral species whose adult form is lost, perhaps by abandonment of the preexisting developmental events of metamorphosis.It has been proposed that a heterochronic process such as neoteny could be the basis for major innovations of new taxa (macroevolution); in a form of heterochrony termed paedomorphosis, a new body plan can be established by elaboration of a larval morphology rather than being restricted to modifications to the preexisting adult body plan.
Title: Heterochrony
Description:
AbstractHeterochrony has often been proposed as a leading mechanism for macroevolutionary change in morphology of organisms, based simply on a relative shift in the timing of events during embryonic development in the evolving organisms.
Its most recent formulation was in Gould's ‘clock model’.
Such timing shifts were seen as being controlled genetically (by ‘rate genes’) or by hormones (such as thyroxine).
Heterochrony has much in common with the concept of allometry.
The concept originated in the context of the idea of recapitulation where embryonic development was interpreted as a repetition of the organism's evolutionary history but in accelerated form; deviations from this recapitulation were identified as instances of heterochrony.
In a later version used to explain macroevolutionary change (paedomorphosis), a new adult morphology is derived from ancestral larval forms by truncation of ancestral adult stages.
However, it is difficult to see how genuine structural novelty can be explained, given that timing changes during development can in themselves do no more than redeploy preexisting characters.
The explanatory value of the concept of heterochrony is increasingly questioned; at best it only indirectly relates to, or identifies, specific underlying mechanisms.
It is in effect a form of redescription.
Key Concepts:The extension across time of stages and component events in embryonic development is an inherent feature because development involves a cumulative succession of cell multiplication and differentiative processes, all starting from the single cell stage of the egg.
The controversial concept of heterochrony attempts to characterise a mechanism controlling variations in developmental timing of the embryo or its component parts, which could potentially mediate and explain the evolution of new morphologies.
Neoteny is a paradigm example of heterochrony, in which the adult morphology of a species is thought to be derived from the larval form of an ancestral species whose adult form is lost, perhaps by abandonment of the preexisting developmental events of metamorphosis.
It has been proposed that a heterochronic process such as neoteny could be the basis for major innovations of new taxa (macroevolution); in a form of heterochrony termed paedomorphosis, a new body plan can be established by elaboration of a larval morphology rather than being restricted to modifications to the preexisting adult body plan.
Related Results
Heterochrony
Heterochrony
Heterochrony, broadly defined, refers to evolutionary change in the rate or timing of development. The concept has long been central to evolutionary developmental biology and remai...
Heterochrony as Diachronically Modified Cell-Cell Interactions
Heterochrony as Diachronically Modified Cell-Cell Interactions
Heterochrony is an enabling concept in evolution theory that metaphorically captures the mechanism of biologic change due to mechanisms of growth and development. The spatio-tempor...
Heterochrony
Heterochrony
Abstract
Heterochrony is a supposedly important mechanism for macroevolutionary change based on shifts in the timing of developmental events in the embryo....
Introduction: Modernism, Time Machines and the Defamiliarisation of Time
Introduction: Modernism, Time Machines and the Defamiliarisation of Time
This introduction returns to modernism’s incipient moments as the “Jonbar hinge” or pivot point for an alternative history of the period’s well-known time fixation. Using Lefebvre ...
The Heterochronic Past and Sidewise Historicity: T. S. Eliot, Pablo Picasso and Murray Leinster
The Heterochronic Past and Sidewise Historicity: T. S. Eliot, Pablo Picasso and Murray Leinster
At the beginning of the twentieth century, primitivism and paleomodernism appeared to reflect primarily those conditions out of which both modernism and SF have been shown to emerg...
Temporal Scale, The Far Future and Inhuman Times: Foresight in Wells and Woolf, Time Travel in Olaf Stapledon and Terrence Malick
Temporal Scale, The Far Future and Inhuman Times: Foresight in Wells and Woolf, Time Travel in Olaf Stapledon and Terrence Malick
This chapter links the period’s visions of the far future with modernism’s engagement with deep time in order to show how the big historicising that begins in the nineteenth centur...
Cinematic Art (History) and Mieke Bal's Thinking in Film
Cinematic Art (History) and Mieke Bal's Thinking in Film
The article focuses on Mieke Bal’s theoretical considerations of art in terms of film and movement in general. This cinematic frame offers her a conceptual framework for “thinking ...
Introduction: Timely Matters
Introduction: Timely Matters
In this introduction to our edited volume, we discuss the theoretical forebears that inform our guiding concept of “material temporalities” with an eye to the collections impact on...

