Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist
View through CrossRef
The Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist (UV-OSCL) is a list of 14 items that helps researchers work according to open science principles in all phases of their research
Those open science principles are: transparency, accessibility, reproducibility, citizen science and FAIR data management. In addition, the UV-OSCL wants to inspire institutional policy makers to create policies that maximize the facilitation of responsible research practices. This can be done by making the checklist central to research applications, research execution and research program monitoring.
How to use the Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist.
The checklist can be used structurally and incidentally.
Structural use. The checklist will reach its maximum potential if the management of knowledge centers and CoEs use the checklist as a policy tool and organize their pre-award and post-award research processes around the checklist items. Annually, for example, a data steward could check with researchers on a project in an open dialogue to see which of the 14 items have been met. In this way, the progress of the knowledge center or CoE can be monitored over time and it is learned which items are difficult or easy to implement and how the policy (or possibly the checklist itself) can be adjusted accordingly. If such discussions can include the end responsible professors, this is highly recommended.
Incidental use. In research projects, researchers can use the checklist as a compass, which if followed, leads to highly responsible research practice and the avoidance of 'research waste'.
The UV-OSCL begins with a general question about having an Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) of the team members in the research project. This is followed by thirteen items that are loosely arranged in a time sequence and are divided into four phases of research: application, planning, execution, and completion. When using the checklist structurally, professors or support desk staff could engage with the researcher in a discussion about how the team wants to implement the principles the checklist points out. The checklist and accompanying infographic depicting the checklist are linked via links to 14 corresponding chapters of the Urban Vitality Open Science Research Manual. The manual succinctly but clearly explains the background of the items and how the items can be met efficiently.
The checklist can also be used by institutions to send a signal to funders: We endorse this checklist, try to work according to the checklist as much as possible and can therefore guarantee that the grant is spent on responsible research.
Where does the Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist come from?
The Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist was developed at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences. Specifically, it comes from the SIA project Mensen in Beweging . In 2020, the methodologist and the data steward, who were responsible for the work package Quality Improvement, combined their joint knowledge about four sources of inspiration into the checklist. These sources of inspiration are: the Dutch Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity, the Open Science transparency principles, the literature on Avoidable Research Waste and that on the replication crisis in science.
Title: Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist
Description:
The Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist (UV-OSCL) is a list of 14 items that helps researchers work according to open science principles in all phases of their research
Those open science principles are: transparency, accessibility, reproducibility, citizen science and FAIR data management.
In addition, the UV-OSCL wants to inspire institutional policy makers to create policies that maximize the facilitation of responsible research practices.
This can be done by making the checklist central to research applications, research execution and research program monitoring.
How to use the Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist.
The checklist can be used structurally and incidentally.
Structural use.
The checklist will reach its maximum potential if the management of knowledge centers and CoEs use the checklist as a policy tool and organize their pre-award and post-award research processes around the checklist items.
Annually, for example, a data steward could check with researchers on a project in an open dialogue to see which of the 14 items have been met.
In this way, the progress of the knowledge center or CoE can be monitored over time and it is learned which items are difficult or easy to implement and how the policy (or possibly the checklist itself) can be adjusted accordingly.
If such discussions can include the end responsible professors, this is highly recommended.
Incidental use.
In research projects, researchers can use the checklist as a compass, which if followed, leads to highly responsible research practice and the avoidance of 'research waste'.
The UV-OSCL begins with a general question about having an Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) of the team members in the research project.
This is followed by thirteen items that are loosely arranged in a time sequence and are divided into four phases of research: application, planning, execution, and completion.
When using the checklist structurally, professors or support desk staff could engage with the researcher in a discussion about how the team wants to implement the principles the checklist points out.
The checklist and accompanying infographic depicting the checklist are linked via links to 14 corresponding chapters of the Urban Vitality Open Science Research Manual.
The manual succinctly but clearly explains the background of the items and how the items can be met efficiently.
The checklist can also be used by institutions to send a signal to funders: We endorse this checklist, try to work according to the checklist as much as possible and can therefore guarantee that the grant is spent on responsible research.
Where does the Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist come from?
The Urban Vitality Open Science Checklist was developed at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
Specifically, it comes from the SIA project Mensen in Beweging .
In 2020, the methodologist and the data steward, who were responsible for the work package Quality Improvement, combined their joint knowledge about four sources of inspiration into the checklist.
These sources of inspiration are: the Dutch Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity, the Open Science transparency principles, the literature on Avoidable Research Waste and that on the replication crisis in science.
Related Results
Does urban renewal enhance urban vitality? A case study of Nanjing, China, using multidimensional data
Does urban renewal enhance urban vitality? A case study of Nanjing, China, using multidimensional data
Urban renewal is critical for improving city functionality after reaching a certain urbanization level. Although urban vitality is an effective indicator of the spatiotemporal effe...
Umbilical Artery Doppler Measurements in Last Week of Pregnancy and Correlation with Vitality of Newborn Lambs
Umbilical Artery Doppler Measurements in Last Week of Pregnancy and Correlation with Vitality of Newborn Lambs
Background: There is a high lamb mortality rate during the first 3 days of life, resulting in sheep flock economic losses and neonate welfare concerns. A significant number of neon...
Vitality form expression in autism
Vitality form expression in autism
AbstractThe notion of “vitality form” has been coined by Daniel Stern to describe the basic features of action, which may reflect the mood or affective state of an agent. There is ...
Temporal Variation of Ecological Factors Affecting Bird Species Richness in Urban and Peri-Urban Forests in a Changing Environment: A Case Study from Milan (Northern Italy)
Temporal Variation of Ecological Factors Affecting Bird Species Richness in Urban and Peri-Urban Forests in a Changing Environment: A Case Study from Milan (Northern Italy)
Urban and peri-urban forests determine different habitat services for biodiversity according to their characteristics. In this study, we relate ecological characteristics of urban ...
Urban Agriculture: Exploring Its Potential, Challenges, and Socio-Economic Impacts
Urban Agriculture: Exploring Its Potential, Challenges, and Socio-Economic Impacts
Urban agriculture, the practice of growing and cultivating food within urban and peri-urban areas, has garnered increasing attention in recent years due to its potential to address...
Research on the Measurement and Influencing Factors of Street Vigor in Historic District: A Case Study of Wenming Street Historic District in Kunming
Research on the Measurement and Influencing Factors of Street Vigor in Historic District: A Case Study of Wenming Street Historic District in Kunming
Analyzing the distribution characteristics of the vitality of traditional streets and its influencing factors is of great significance to the sustainable development of historic st...
Maximizing coverage, reducing time: a usability evaluation method for web-based library systems
Maximizing coverage, reducing time: a usability evaluation method for web-based library systems
AbstractThe usability of a Web Based Library System (WBLS) is an important quality attribute that must be met in order for the intended users to be satisfied. These usability quali...
The provider’s checklist to improve pregnant women coverage by intermittent preventive malaria treatment in Mali: a pilot implementation study
The provider’s checklist to improve pregnant women coverage by intermittent preventive malaria treatment in Mali: a pilot implementation study
Abstract
Background
Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp) is a comprehensive treatment protocol of anti-malarial drugs ad...

