Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
View through CrossRef
Background:
Whether one should eat or skip breakfast for weight is of continued interest in both the scientific and lay communities. Our objective was to systematically review and meta-analyze causal effects of eating versus skipping breakfast on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes in humans.
Methods:
AltHealthWatch, CINAHL, Proquest Theses and Dissertations Global, PsycInfo, and Scopus were searched for obesity- and breakfast-related terms in humans (final search: 02 JAN 2020). Studies needed to isolate eating versus skipping breakfast in randomized controlled trials. Mean differences were synthesized using inverse variance random effects meta-analysis for each outcome measured in more than one study. Positive estimates indicate higher outcomes in breakfast conditions (e.g., weight gain). Leave-one-out analysis was used for sensitivity. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Results:
Ten articles (12 comparisons) were included. Study lengths spanned 6 days to 16 weeks. Conditions included recommendations to eat versus skip breakfast, or provision of some or all meals. 95% confidence intervals of all main analyses included the null value of no difference for each outcome: body weight (0.17 kg [-0.40,0.74], k=12, n=486, I
2
=74.4), BMI (0.08 kg/m
2
[-0.10,0.26, k=8, n=395, I
2
=53.9), body fat percentage (-0.27% [-1.01,0.47], k=6, n=179, I
2
=52.4), fat mass (0.24 kg [-0.21,0.69], k=6, n=205, I
2
=0.0), lean mass (0.18 kg [-0.08,0.44], k=6, n=205, I
2
=6.7), waist circumference (0.18 cm [-1.77,2.13], k=4, n=102, I
2
=78.7), waist:hip ratio (0.00 [-0.01,0.01], k=4, n=102, I
2
=8.0), sagittal abdominal diameter (0.19 cm [-2.35,2.73], k=2, n=56, I
2
=0.0), and fat mass index (0.00 kg/m
2
[-0.22,0.23], k=2, n=56, I
2
=0.0). One study reported muscle mass and total body water percentage. Leave-one-out analysis did not indicate substantial influence of any one study.
Conclusions:
There was no discernible effect of eating or skipping breakfast on obesity-related anthropometric measures when pooling studies with substantial design heterogeneity and sometimes statistical heterogeneity.
Registration:
PROSPERO
CRD42016033290
.
F1000 Research Ltd
Title: Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Description:
Background:
Whether one should eat or skip breakfast for weight is of continued interest in both the scientific and lay communities.
Our objective was to systematically review and meta-analyze causal effects of eating versus skipping breakfast on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes in humans.
Methods:
AltHealthWatch, CINAHL, Proquest Theses and Dissertations Global, PsycInfo, and Scopus were searched for obesity- and breakfast-related terms in humans (final search: 02 JAN 2020).
Studies needed to isolate eating versus skipping breakfast in randomized controlled trials.
Mean differences were synthesized using inverse variance random effects meta-analysis for each outcome measured in more than one study.
Positive estimates indicate higher outcomes in breakfast conditions (e.
g.
, weight gain).
Leave-one-out analysis was used for sensitivity.
Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Results:
Ten articles (12 comparisons) were included.
Study lengths spanned 6 days to 16 weeks.
Conditions included recommendations to eat versus skip breakfast, or provision of some or all meals.
95% confidence intervals of all main analyses included the null value of no difference for each outcome: body weight (0.
17 kg [-0.
40,0.
74], k=12, n=486, I
2
=74.
4), BMI (0.
08 kg/m
2
[-0.
10,0.
26, k=8, n=395, I
2
=53.
9), body fat percentage (-0.
27% [-1.
01,0.
47], k=6, n=179, I
2
=52.
4), fat mass (0.
24 kg [-0.
21,0.
69], k=6, n=205, I
2
=0.
0), lean mass (0.
18 kg [-0.
08,0.
44], k=6, n=205, I
2
=6.
7), waist circumference (0.
18 cm [-1.
77,2.
13], k=4, n=102, I
2
=78.
7), waist:hip ratio (0.
00 [-0.
01,0.
01], k=4, n=102, I
2
=8.
0), sagittal abdominal diameter (0.
19 cm [-2.
35,2.
73], k=2, n=56, I
2
=0.
0), and fat mass index (0.
00 kg/m
2
[-0.
22,0.
23], k=2, n=56, I
2
=0.
0).
One study reported muscle mass and total body water percentage.
Leave-one-out analysis did not indicate substantial influence of any one study.
Conclusions:
There was no discernible effect of eating or skipping breakfast on obesity-related anthropometric measures when pooling studies with substantial design heterogeneity and sometimes statistical heterogeneity.
Registration:
PROSPERO
CRD42016033290
.
Related Results
Effect of breakfast eating versus breakfast skipping on obesity related anthropometry: a systematic review
Effect of breakfast eating versus breakfast skipping on obesity related anthropometry: a systematic review
Background
Breakfast consumption is frequently recommended for weight loss and the prevention of obesity. Although breakfast eating has been repeatedly associat...
Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background:
Eating or skipping breakfast for weight interests scientific and lay communities. Our objective was to systematically review and meta-analyze causal...
Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Eating versus skipping breakfast has no discernible effect on obesity-related anthropometric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background:
Eating or skipping breakfast for weight interests scientific and lay communities. Our objective was to systematically review and meta-analyze causal...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Eating Habits Associated with Overweight and Obesity: Case - Control Study in 11-14 year old Adolescents in Hanoi in 2020
Eating Habits Associated with Overweight and Obesity: Case - Control Study in 11-14 year old Adolescents in Hanoi in 2020
Eating habits appears to be an important determinant of dietary intake and may consequently influence overweight and obesity. Understanding the relationship between the nutritional...
Double Burden of Nutrition and some Eating Habits Characteristics of Preschool Children in Nam Hong Commune, Dong Anh district, Hanoi, 2018
Double Burden of Nutrition and some Eating Habits Characteristics of Preschool Children in Nam Hong Commune, Dong Anh district, Hanoi, 2018
Abstract: The study aims to provide evidence of double nutritional burden (including malnutrition and overweight/obesity) as well as the impact of eating habits on nutritional stat...
THE IMPACT OF BREAKFAST SKIPPING ON TYPE 2 DIABETES RISK AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN KARACHI" PAKISTAN
THE IMPACT OF BREAKFAST SKIPPING ON TYPE 2 DIABETES RISK AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN KARACHI" PAKISTAN
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the impact of breakfast skipping on the risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus among university students in Karachi, Pakistan.
Backg...
Association of Breakfast Skipping with Academic Performance among Undergraduate Students
Association of Breakfast Skipping with Academic Performance among Undergraduate Students
Breakfast is said to be the most essential meal of the day for circadian rhythm and physiological metabolism. Breakfast is broadly acknowledged as a key element of a healthy lifest...

