Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Genetic profiling of different phenotypic subsets of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) in breast cancer patients

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) have a crucial role in breast carcinogenesis, development, and progression. The aim of the current study is to characterize the BCSCs through the genetic profiling of different BCSCs phenotypic subsets to determine their related genetic pathways. Methods Fresh tumor tissue samples were obtained from 31 breast cancer (BC) patients for (1) Mammosphere culture. (2) Magnetic separation of the BCSCs subsets using CD24, CD44, and CD326 Microbeads. (3) Flow cytometry (FCM) assay using CD44, CD24, and EpCAM. (4) RT-PCR profiler Arrays using stem cell (SC) panel of 84 genes for four group of cells (1) CD44+/CD24−/EpCAM− BCSCs, (2) CD44+/CD24− /EpCAM+ BCSCs, (3) mammospheres, and (4) normal breast tissues. Results The BCSCs (CD44+/CD24−/EpCAM−) showed significant downregulation in 13 genes and upregulation in 15, where the CD44, GJB1 and GDF3 showed the maximal expression (P = 0.001, P = 0.003 and P = 0.007); respectively). The CD44+/CD24−/EpCAM+ BCSCs showed significant upregulation in 28 genes, where the CD44, GDF3, and GJB1 showed maximal expression (P < 0.001, P = 0.001 and P = 0.003; respectively). The mammospheres showed significant downregulation in 9 genes and a significant upregulation in 35 genes. The maximal overexpression was observed in GJB1 and FGF2 (P = 0.001, P = 0.001; respectively). The genes which achieved significant overexpression in all SC subsets were CD44, COL9A1, FGF1, FGF2, GDF3, GJA1, GJB1, GJB2, HSPA9, and KRT15. While significant downregulation in BMP2, BMP3, EP300, and KAT8. The genes which were differentially expressed by the mammospheres compared to the other BCSC subsets were CCND2, FGF3, CD4, WNT1, KAT2A, NUMB, ACAN, COL2A1, TUBB3, ASCL2, FOXA2, ISL1, DTX1, and DVL1. Conclusion BCSCs have specific molecular profiles that differ according to their phenotypes which could affect patients’ prognosis and outcome.
Title: Genetic profiling of different phenotypic subsets of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) in breast cancer patients
Description:
Abstract Background Breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) have a crucial role in breast carcinogenesis, development, and progression.
The aim of the current study is to characterize the BCSCs through the genetic profiling of different BCSCs phenotypic subsets to determine their related genetic pathways.
Methods Fresh tumor tissue samples were obtained from 31 breast cancer (BC) patients for (1) Mammosphere culture.
(2) Magnetic separation of the BCSCs subsets using CD24, CD44, and CD326 Microbeads.
(3) Flow cytometry (FCM) assay using CD44, CD24, and EpCAM.
(4) RT-PCR profiler Arrays using stem cell (SC) panel of 84 genes for four group of cells (1) CD44+/CD24−/EpCAM− BCSCs, (2) CD44+/CD24− /EpCAM+ BCSCs, (3) mammospheres, and (4) normal breast tissues.
Results The BCSCs (CD44+/CD24−/EpCAM−) showed significant downregulation in 13 genes and upregulation in 15, where the CD44, GJB1 and GDF3 showed the maximal expression (P = 0.
001, P = 0.
003 and P = 0.
007); respectively).
The CD44+/CD24−/EpCAM+ BCSCs showed significant upregulation in 28 genes, where the CD44, GDF3, and GJB1 showed maximal expression (P < 0.
001, P = 0.
001 and P = 0.
003; respectively).
The mammospheres showed significant downregulation in 9 genes and a significant upregulation in 35 genes.
The maximal overexpression was observed in GJB1 and FGF2 (P = 0.
001, P = 0.
001; respectively).
The genes which achieved significant overexpression in all SC subsets were CD44, COL9A1, FGF1, FGF2, GDF3, GJA1, GJB1, GJB2, HSPA9, and KRT15.
While significant downregulation in BMP2, BMP3, EP300, and KAT8.
The genes which were differentially expressed by the mammospheres compared to the other BCSC subsets were CCND2, FGF3, CD4, WNT1, KAT2A, NUMB, ACAN, COL2A1, TUBB3, ASCL2, FOXA2, ISL1, DTX1, and DVL1.
Conclusion BCSCs have specific molecular profiles that differ according to their phenotypes which could affect patients’ prognosis and outcome.

Related Results

The Role of MicroRNAs Regulated Breast Cancer Stem Cells in the Pathogenesis, Prognosis and Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer
The Role of MicroRNAs Regulated Breast Cancer Stem Cells in the Pathogenesis, Prognosis and Aggressiveness of Breast Cancer
Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer related death among women worldwide and it is a complex disease characterized by its heterogeneity. The heterogenous characteristic of th...
Stem cells
Stem cells
What is a stem cell? The term is a combination of ‘cell’ and ‘stem’. A cell is a major category of living thing, while a stem is a site of growth and support for something else. In...
Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Coexisting Granulomatous Mastitis and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Granulomatous mastitis (GM) is a rare inflammatory breast disease that mimics carcinoma. GM can coexist with breast cancer (BC), though the relationship rema...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis of The Breast: A Case Series
Abstract IntroductionDesmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF), also called aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare, benign, locally aggressive condition. Mammary DTF originates from fibroblasts ...

Back to Top