Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Making the University Safe for Democracy, 1902-1910

View through CrossRef
The service of institutions of learning is not private but public,” Woodrow Wilson proclaimed at his inauguration as Princeton University’s thirteenth president. “Princeton for the Nation’s Service,” the title of Wilson’s 1902 inaugural address, captured his vision of Princeton’s mission. The nation, Wilson believed, desperately needed the university. The nation and its affairs, he observed, continued to “grow more and more complex” as a result of industrialization and bureaucratization. Furthermore, as successive waves of non-Protestant and non- Anglo-Saxon immigrant groups—”the more sordid and hapless elements” of southern Europe, as he described them elsewhere—congregated in the nation’s growing cities, Wilson, like other Protestant leaders of his day, feared that America’s democratic society stood on the verge of chaos. The very fabric of American society seemed to be ripping apart under the weight of ethnic and religious diversity. Like other educators of the day, Wilson envisioned the modern university’s playing a crucial role in ordering the nation’s business and political affairs and shaping the aspirations and values of the American people. A university education, Wilson explained, was “not for the majority who carry forward the common labor of the world” but for those who would lead the nation and mold the “sound sense and equipment of the rank and file.” The university’s task was twofold: “the production of a great body of informed and thoughtful men and the production of a small body of trained scholars and investigators.” The latter function gave the university a larger civic mission than a college. According to Wilson’s vision, Princeton would not train “servants of a trade or skilled practitioners of a profession.” By enlarging the minds of students and giving them a “catholic vision” of their social responsibilities, Princeton instead would cultivate “citizens” who would live under the “high law of duty.” “Every American university,” Wilson concluded, “must square its standards by that law or lack its national title.” Wilson’s inauguration appeared to confirm the New York Sun’s assessment of his election: “the secularization of our collegiate education grows steadily more complete.”
Title: Making the University Safe for Democracy, 1902-1910
Description:
The service of institutions of learning is not private but public,” Woodrow Wilson proclaimed at his inauguration as Princeton University’s thirteenth president.
“Princeton for the Nation’s Service,” the title of Wilson’s 1902 inaugural address, captured his vision of Princeton’s mission.
The nation, Wilson believed, desperately needed the university.
The nation and its affairs, he observed, continued to “grow more and more complex” as a result of industrialization and bureaucratization.
Furthermore, as successive waves of non-Protestant and non- Anglo-Saxon immigrant groups—”the more sordid and hapless elements” of southern Europe, as he described them elsewhere—congregated in the nation’s growing cities, Wilson, like other Protestant leaders of his day, feared that America’s democratic society stood on the verge of chaos.
The very fabric of American society seemed to be ripping apart under the weight of ethnic and religious diversity.
Like other educators of the day, Wilson envisioned the modern university’s playing a crucial role in ordering the nation’s business and political affairs and shaping the aspirations and values of the American people.
A university education, Wilson explained, was “not for the majority who carry forward the common labor of the world” but for those who would lead the nation and mold the “sound sense and equipment of the rank and file.
” The university’s task was twofold: “the production of a great body of informed and thoughtful men and the production of a small body of trained scholars and investigators.
” The latter function gave the university a larger civic mission than a college.
According to Wilson’s vision, Princeton would not train “servants of a trade or skilled practitioners of a profession.
” By enlarging the minds of students and giving them a “catholic vision” of their social responsibilities, Princeton instead would cultivate “citizens” who would live under the “high law of duty.
” “Every American university,” Wilson concluded, “must square its standards by that law or lack its national title.
” Wilson’s inauguration appeared to confirm the New York Sun’s assessment of his election: “the secularization of our collegiate education grows steadily more complete.
”.

Related Results

Vote!
Vote!
The twentieth was, from one perspective, the democratic century — a span of one hundred years which began with no fully functioning democracies in existence anywhere on the planet ...
What Causes Democracy?
What Causes Democracy?
In pointing to a definition of “democracy,” there is no single concept of the term on which all scholars agree. The question of “what a democracy is … and is not,” to borrow the ti...
VARIABILITY OF MODERN DEMOCRACY: A BRIEF ANALYSIS
VARIABILITY OF MODERN DEMOCRACY: A BRIEF ANALYSIS
It is noted that at present, Ukraine, due to the actualization of the search for a future path in the conditions of uncertainty of the existential situation, has once again found i...
Democracy
Democracy
Democracy is a term that is used to denote a variety of distinct objects and ideas. Democracy describes either a set of political institutions or an ideal of collective self-rule. ...
Kaleidoscopic Leadership in Contemporary Democracies
Kaleidoscopic Leadership in Contemporary Democracies
Democratic theory and leadership studies are closely related. Yet, the idea of democratic leadership is inherently paradoxical. Whereas the concept of democracy rests on the idea o...
Democratic Theory and the ‘Anomaly’ of Leadership
Democratic Theory and the ‘Anomaly’ of Leadership
Democratic theory and leadership studies are closely related. Yet, the idea of democratic leadership is inherently paradoxical. Whereas the concept of democracy rests on the idea o...
Themes of Democracy in Everyday Knowledge
Themes of Democracy in Everyday Knowledge
This study aimed to examine how citizens in Türkiye conceptualize democracy. The study was conducted with participants living in Istanbul, a highly heterogeneous city that is thoug...
Konsep Dan Urgensi Demokrasi Pancasila
Konsep Dan Urgensi Demokrasi Pancasila
Democracy as a system has become an alternative in various social and state activities in several countries. The reason for making democracy a social and state system is because al...

Back to Top