Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY IS ALSO FAILED TO EXPLAIN NULL RESULT OF MICHELSON AND MORLEY EXPERIMENT

View through CrossRef
Michelson and Morley conducted an experiment in the year 1887 to measure the speed of earth in luminiferous aether.  In this experiment Michelson’s interferometer was used in which two waves are superimposed to generate interference fringes. Keeping in view known velocity of earth around the sun a fringe shift of 0.44 fringe was expected on the rotation of interferometer at an angle of 900, but surprisingly no fringe shift was observed. The experiment was conducted so many times and at so many places but always null results were obtained. The null result of MMX could not be explained by classical mechanics. A number of explanations for null results were submitted but no one was found to be correct. George Fitzerald and Hendrick Lorentz proposed length contraction hypothesis in the direction of motion of earth, but it was also rejected being an adhoc hypothesis. Albert Einstein submitted his famous theory “The special theory of relativity” in the year 1905. The second postulate of the STR states that speed of light is constant in all directions of inertial frames of reference irrespective of motion of source of light or the observer and states that no luminiferous aether exist as a medium, light waves do not require any medium to propagate. As light travels with constant velocity in both the arms of interferometer irrespective of motion of interferometer and there involves no time difference between the two rays hence null results of MMX were explained by special theory of relativity. Michelson and Morley experiment is based on the wave nature of light. In such experiments wavefront of light plays very important role but behaviour of wavefront of light was not taken into consideration while deriving the time taken by the light rays in the arms of interferometer due to motion of earth resulting into wrong derivation of time. The present article describes the principle and realization of role of wavefront of light in MMX. The time taken by light rays in the arms of the interferometer due to motion of earth depends upon the behaviour of wavefront of light. It has been established by results of Fizeau experiment and steller aberration of light that speed of light is not effected by velocity of moving medium. The derivation of time has been worked out keeping in view constancy of speed of light, wavefront of light and laws of reflection of light according to Huygen’s principle. Contrary to earlier beliefs the Lorentz length contraction hypothesis is not able to explain the null results of MMX. In the light of new facts it is established that there is no difference between theorectical results derived by classical mechanics and special theory of relativity. Special theory of relativity is also failed to explain the null result of MMX. The null result of Michelson and Morley experiment has again become a perplexing question for physicists.
Title: SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY IS ALSO FAILED TO EXPLAIN NULL RESULT OF MICHELSON AND MORLEY EXPERIMENT
Description:
Michelson and Morley conducted an experiment in the year 1887 to measure the speed of earth in luminiferous aether.
  In this experiment Michelson’s interferometer was used in which two waves are superimposed to generate interference fringes.
Keeping in view known velocity of earth around the sun a fringe shift of 0.
44 fringe was expected on the rotation of interferometer at an angle of 900, but surprisingly no fringe shift was observed.
The experiment was conducted so many times and at so many places but always null results were obtained.
The null result of MMX could not be explained by classical mechanics.
A number of explanations for null results were submitted but no one was found to be correct.
George Fitzerald and Hendrick Lorentz proposed length contraction hypothesis in the direction of motion of earth, but it was also rejected being an adhoc hypothesis.
Albert Einstein submitted his famous theory “The special theory of relativity” in the year 1905.
The second postulate of the STR states that speed of light is constant in all directions of inertial frames of reference irrespective of motion of source of light or the observer and states that no luminiferous aether exist as a medium, light waves do not require any medium to propagate.
As light travels with constant velocity in both the arms of interferometer irrespective of motion of interferometer and there involves no time difference between the two rays hence null results of MMX were explained by special theory of relativity.
Michelson and Morley experiment is based on the wave nature of light.
In such experiments wavefront of light plays very important role but behaviour of wavefront of light was not taken into consideration while deriving the time taken by the light rays in the arms of interferometer due to motion of earth resulting into wrong derivation of time.
The present article describes the principle and realization of role of wavefront of light in MMX.
The time taken by light rays in the arms of the interferometer due to motion of earth depends upon the behaviour of wavefront of light.
It has been established by results of Fizeau experiment and steller aberration of light that speed of light is not effected by velocity of moving medium.
The derivation of time has been worked out keeping in view constancy of speed of light, wavefront of light and laws of reflection of light according to Huygen’s principle.
Contrary to earlier beliefs the Lorentz length contraction hypothesis is not able to explain the null results of MMX.
In the light of new facts it is established that there is no difference between theorectical results derived by classical mechanics and special theory of relativity.
Special theory of relativity is also failed to explain the null result of MMX.
The null result of Michelson and Morley experiment has again become a perplexing question for physicists.

Related Results

Limits of Special Relativity
Limits of Special Relativity
HIGHLIGHTS Special relativity has been successfully used to describe the behaviour of particles (Rossi & Hall, 1941), but there is no observation of special relativity in ...
Limits of Special Relativity
Limits of Special Relativity
HIGHLIGHTS This paper is presenting an experiment based on Ehrenfest's paradox where an effect of special relativity was expected but not observed. The validity of special relativi...
The Special theory of relativity in different media(Ⅰ)
The Special theory of relativity in different media(Ⅰ)
Abstract In this paper, the special theory of relativity in different media is established, based on the fundamental invariant of the space-time four-dimensional space x2 +...
Morley of Blackburn
Morley of Blackburn
This biography covers both the literary and political career of John Morley, later Lord Morley of Blackburn (1838–1923). As a writer, Morley made his reputation as the radical edit...
SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY UNDER THREAT
SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY UNDER THREAT
In optics experiments are conducted on the wave nature of light. Interferometers are used for measurements and two waves are superimposed to generate interference fringes. In such ...
The Special theory of relativity in different media (Ⅱ)
The Special theory of relativity in different media (Ⅱ)
Abstract This paper analyzes the problems and contradictions that occur when the traditional special theory of relativity which uses the speed of light in a vacuum as an in...
The precise calculations of the constant terms in the equations of motions of planets and photons of general relativity
The precise calculations of the constant terms in the equations of motions of planets and photons of general relativity
In general relativity, the values of constant terms in the equations of motions of planets and light have not been seriously discussed. Based on the Schwarzschild metric and the ge...
A Generalized Contraction Framework for the Michelson-Morley Null Result in a Medium-Based Theory
A Generalized Contraction Framework for the Michelson-Morley Null Result in a Medium-Based Theory
The Michelson--Morley experiment yielded a null result, indicating equal light travel times in the longitudinal and transverse arms of an interferometer, traditionally interpreted ...

Back to Top