Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Performance and Anthropometric Comparison: U16 vs. U18 Male Basketball Players

View through CrossRef
This study aimed to compare the anthropometric and performance characteristics of U16 and U18 male basketball players to better understand post-peak height velocity (PHV) developmental differences. A total of 31 athletes from the local international basketball academy participated in the research—15 from the U16 category (15.25 ± 0.86 years) and 16 from the U18 category (17.46 ± 0.34 years). Measurements included body composition, sprinting (with and without the ball), agility, and jump performance. The results revealed significant between-group differences in most anthropometric variables (p < 0.001), including body mass, BMI, skeletal muscle mass, fat-free mass, total body water, and segmental muscle mass. However, there were no significant differences in body height and body fat percentage. Performance comparisons showed that U18 players outperformed U16 players in agility (p = 0.026), 10m and 20m sprint (p = 0.045 and p = 0.016, respectively), and 20m dribbling sprint (p = 0.011), while no significant differences were observed in jumping ability. These findings suggest that physical maturation strongly influences anthropometric parameters and partially affects performance characteristics. The results highlight the importance of age-appropriate training strategies that consider biological development stages in youth basketball.
Title: Performance and Anthropometric Comparison: U16 vs. U18 Male Basketball Players
Description:
This study aimed to compare the anthropometric and performance characteristics of U16 and U18 male basketball players to better understand post-peak height velocity (PHV) developmental differences.
A total of 31 athletes from the local international basketball academy participated in the research—15 from the U16 category (15.
25 ± 0.
86 years) and 16 from the U18 category (17.
46 ± 0.
34 years).
Measurements included body composition, sprinting (with and without the ball), agility, and jump performance.
The results revealed significant between-group differences in most anthropometric variables (p < 0.
001), including body mass, BMI, skeletal muscle mass, fat-free mass, total body water, and segmental muscle mass.
However, there were no significant differences in body height and body fat percentage.
Performance comparisons showed that U18 players outperformed U16 players in agility (p = 0.
026), 10m and 20m sprint (p = 0.
045 and p = 0.
016, respectively), and 20m dribbling sprint (p = 0.
011), while no significant differences were observed in jumping ability.
These findings suggest that physical maturation strongly influences anthropometric parameters and partially affects performance characteristics.
The results highlight the importance of age-appropriate training strategies that consider biological development stages in youth basketball.

Related Results

Constructing Norms for Skill Test Items as a Barometer for Sports Potential Betwixt Basketball Players
Constructing Norms for Skill Test Items as a Barometer for Sports Potential Betwixt Basketball Players
The Aim of this study was to examine the Dataset, Grade Distribution and Constructing Percentile Scores of Basketball Skill Test Items. For this investigation, sixty (N=60) state l...
Visual Patterns of U16 Athletes and Professional Basketball Players
Visual Patterns of U16 Athletes and Professional Basketball Players
This work aimed to compare the visual patterns of under 16 (U16) athletes and professional basketball players. The sample was composed of 10 U16 (aged 15.2 ± 0.4 years; 7.1 ± 2.5 y...
Test design to measure the accuracy and tolerance of wheelchair basketball players
Test design to measure the accuracy and tolerance of wheelchair basketball players
 The aim of the research was to design a test to measure the accuracy of correction and tolerance for wheelchair basketball players, in addition to measuring the correction by its ...
Biomechanical Features of Drop Vertical Jump Are Different Among Various Sporting Activities
Biomechanical Features of Drop Vertical Jump Are Different Among Various Sporting Activities
Abstract Background: Risk for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can be assessed based on drop vertical jump (DVJ). However, biomechanics of DVJ should dif...
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED] Rhino XL Male Enhancement v1
[RETRACTED]Rhino XL Reviews, NY USA: Studies show that testosterone levels in males decrease constantly with growing age. There are also many other problems that males face due ...
Analysis of body build and physical abilities of volleyball players aged 10–12 years
Analysis of body build and physical abilities of volleyball players aged 10–12 years
The aim of the study was to analyse the body build and physical abilities of 10–12-year-old volleyball players in order to identify the most promising young volleyball players in E...
Differences in the bioenergetic potential of athletes participating in team sports
Differences in the bioenergetic potential of athletes participating in team sports
Background/Aim. In modern training technology, assessment of aerobic bioenergetic potential in athletes is commonly performed by standard laboratory procedures to determine b...

Back to Top