Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Distance Visual Acuity Versus Near Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.

View through CrossRef
Abstract Purpose: To measure and compare distance and near visual acuity in amblyopic patients.Methods: This study was evaluated 167 patients with amblyopia between ages of 6 and 55 years. In all subjects, a comprehensive ophthalmic examination including visual acuity, refraction, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and funduscopy was performed. Distance visual acuity (DVA) was measured by Snellen chart at 4 m and near visual acuity (NVA) was measured by Snellen chart at 40 cm, and then DVA and NVA were compered and analyzed.Results:In our subjects, the mean distance and near visual acuity was 0.39± 0.30 log MAR and 0.30± 0.32 log MAR respectively. The mean NVA was 0.12±0.12 log MAR better than DVA and difference between them was statistically significant (P<0.001). In 40% of patients, there were no difference between DVA and NVA, and in 60% of them, NVA was 0.1 or more log MAR better than DVA. The difference between DVA and NVA was not significantly related with age (p=0.225), spherical equivalent (P=.820) and strabismus (P=.336) and type of amblyopia (P=.405). Although all of these subjects had subnormal DVA, but 43 subjects (26%) had normal NVA. In mild and moderate amblyopic groups, difference between DVA and NVA was 0.14±0.10 log MAR and 0.15±0.14 log MAR respectively, but in severe amblyopic group it was 0.03±0.08 log MAR. The difference between DVA and NVA showed a significant relation with severity of amblyopia (P<0.001). The difference between DVA and NVA was 0.16±0.11 log MAR in patients with history of amblyopia therapy and 0.07.± 0.11 log MAR in patients without treatment. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.001).Conclusion: Our results showed that near visual acuity in amblyopia especially in mild to moderate types was significantly better than distance visual acuity. More than 50% of subjects with mild amblyopia had normal near visual acuity. The difference between DVA and NVA showed no relation with age, spherical equivalent, strabismus, and type of amblyopia. Also, difference between the DVA and NVA in patients with history of amblyopia therapy was better than of it in non-treated subjects.
Title: Distance Visual Acuity Versus Near Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.
Description:
Abstract Purpose: To measure and compare distance and near visual acuity in amblyopic patients.
Methods: This study was evaluated 167 patients with amblyopia between ages of 6 and 55 years.
In all subjects, a comprehensive ophthalmic examination including visual acuity, refraction, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and funduscopy was performed.
Distance visual acuity (DVA) was measured by Snellen chart at 4 m and near visual acuity (NVA) was measured by Snellen chart at 40 cm, and then DVA and NVA were compered and analyzed.
Results:In our subjects, the mean distance and near visual acuity was 0.
39± 0.
30 log MAR and 0.
30± 0.
32 log MAR respectively.
The mean NVA was 0.
12±0.
12 log MAR better than DVA and difference between them was statistically significant (P<0.
001).
In 40% of patients, there were no difference between DVA and NVA, and in 60% of them, NVA was 0.
1 or more log MAR better than DVA.
The difference between DVA and NVA was not significantly related with age (p=0.
225), spherical equivalent (P=.
820) and strabismus (P=.
336) and type of amblyopia (P=.
405).
Although all of these subjects had subnormal DVA, but 43 subjects (26%) had normal NVA.
In mild and moderate amblyopic groups, difference between DVA and NVA was 0.
14±0.
10 log MAR and 0.
15±0.
14 log MAR respectively, but in severe amblyopic group it was 0.
03±0.
08 log MAR.
The difference between DVA and NVA showed a significant relation with severity of amblyopia (P<0.
001).
The difference between DVA and NVA was 0.
16±0.
11 log MAR in patients with history of amblyopia therapy and 0.
07.
± 0.
11 log MAR in patients without treatment.
This difference was statistically significant (P<0.
001).
Conclusion: Our results showed that near visual acuity in amblyopia especially in mild to moderate types was significantly better than distance visual acuity.
More than 50% of subjects with mild amblyopia had normal near visual acuity.
The difference between DVA and NVA showed no relation with age, spherical equivalent, strabismus, and type of amblyopia.
Also, difference between the DVA and NVA in patients with history of amblyopia therapy was better than of it in non-treated subjects.

Related Results

Binocular treatment in adult amblyopia is based on parvocellular or magnocellular pathway
Binocular treatment in adult amblyopia is based on parvocellular or magnocellular pathway
Introduction: Amblyopia is speculated to be an untreatable disease in the patient, who is beyond the critical period of vision; however, currently, it is treata...
Frequency and Causes of Uniocular Amblyopia in Children
Frequency and Causes of Uniocular Amblyopia in Children
Aim: To determine the frequency and causes of uniocular amblyopia in children age 6-14 years visiting a tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Cross-sectional hospital based study. ...
Prevalence of Amblyopia among School age children in Eye University Hospital, Kabul – Afghanistan
Prevalence of Amblyopia among School age children in Eye University Hospital, Kabul – Afghanistan
Introduction: Amblyopia is the reduction of monocular and rarely binocular vision, in the best case, it is the correction of the refractive error, which is caused by the visual dep...
Screening of Primary School Children for Amblyopia and Amblyogenic Factors in Central Cairo, Egypt
Screening of Primary School Children for Amblyopia and Amblyogenic Factors in Central Cairo, Egypt
Objective. To measure the prevalence of amblyopia and amblyogenic factors among primary school children and to evaluate distance visual acuity (VA) as a screening test to detect am...
FREQUENCY OF ANISOMETROPIC AMBLYOPIA AMONG CHILDREN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
FREQUENCY OF ANISOMETROPIC AMBLYOPIA AMONG CHILDREN: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
Background: Amblyopia is a leading cause of preventable visual impairment in children and remains a major contributor to unilateral visual loss worldwide. It commonly arises from a...
Efficacy of Worth 4 Dot Test and Vertical prism dissociation Test in Screening of Amblyopia for School Going Children.
Efficacy of Worth 4 Dot Test and Vertical prism dissociation Test in Screening of Amblyopia for School Going Children.
Introduction: Amblyopia is reduction of best corrected visual acuity in one or both eyes that cannot exclusively be attributed to structural abnormality of the eye. It can be bette...
Non-Interactive Amblyopia Treatment Modalities in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Non-Interactive Amblyopia Treatment Modalities in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract Background: Recently, a number of clinical trials are conducting on amblyopia treatments. Discovering an intervention that provides optimal outcome with minimal su...
Biofeedback fixation training as an important tool to supplement strabismic amblyopia treatment in aduls—preliminary results
Biofeedback fixation training as an important tool to supplement strabismic amblyopia treatment in aduls—preliminary results
Aims/Purpose: Fixation stability may be a biomarker of strabismus and amblyopia recurrence after strabismus surgery and therapeutic interventions to improve visual acuity in amblyo...

Back to Top