Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Legal Regulation of Discrimination in Artificial Intelligence Algorithms

View through CrossRef
With the advancement of information technology, artificial intelligence technology continues to accelerate its iteration, and algorithms are increasingly applied across nearly every industry. During their implementation, algorithmic discrimination inevitably arises due to subjective and objective factors such as the values of developers, data bias, unreasonable programming, and historical legacies. This discrimination violates the legal principle of equality for all and impedes the development of social fairness and justice. Algorithmic discrimination manifests primarily as gender discrimination, employment discrimination, price discrimination, age discrimination, and racial discrimination. Given the current legislative gaps in China regarding algorithmic discrimination, coupled with its covert and specialized nature, regulating it presents challenges such as unclear liability attribution and difficulties for victims in providing evidence. Therefore, to safeguard the healthy development of the artificial intelligence industry and protect citizens' lawful rights and interests from infringement, legal governance of algorithmic discrimination should be strengthened from four perspectives: the state, society, corporate, and individual levels. This requires strengthening supplementary legislation, exercising oversight authority, consciously mitigating the negative impacts of algorithmic discrimination, and cultivating citizens' awareness of their rights. These multifaceted approaches will advance the modernization of China's national governance system and capacity.
Scientific Open Access Publishing
Title: Legal Regulation of Discrimination in Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
Description:
With the advancement of information technology, artificial intelligence technology continues to accelerate its iteration, and algorithms are increasingly applied across nearly every industry.
During their implementation, algorithmic discrimination inevitably arises due to subjective and objective factors such as the values of developers, data bias, unreasonable programming, and historical legacies.
This discrimination violates the legal principle of equality for all and impedes the development of social fairness and justice.
Algorithmic discrimination manifests primarily as gender discrimination, employment discrimination, price discrimination, age discrimination, and racial discrimination.
Given the current legislative gaps in China regarding algorithmic discrimination, coupled with its covert and specialized nature, regulating it presents challenges such as unclear liability attribution and difficulties for victims in providing evidence.
Therefore, to safeguard the healthy development of the artificial intelligence industry and protect citizens' lawful rights and interests from infringement, legal governance of algorithmic discrimination should be strengthened from four perspectives: the state, society, corporate, and individual levels.
This requires strengthening supplementary legislation, exercising oversight authority, consciously mitigating the negative impacts of algorithmic discrimination, and cultivating citizens' awareness of their rights.
These multifaceted approaches will advance the modernization of China's national governance system and capacity.

Related Results

TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
Problem setting. Digitalization has recently become increasingly important in the professional everyday life of a lawyer. Since 2020, trends in the automation of legal processes ha...
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
Ukraine's contemporary legal system is undergoing a period of significant transformation, which necessitates not only a robust and stable legal framework, but also a flexible doctr...
Legal regulation of the genesis of digital identity
Legal regulation of the genesis of digital identity
The article deals with a new phenomenon for the legal science – the institute of legal regulation of the genesis of digital identity.The subject of the research is the relations th...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
POLITIK HUKUM PENGATURAN PERATURAN DESA DALAM PRODUK HUKUM
POLITIK HUKUM PENGATURAN PERATURAN DESA DALAM PRODUK HUKUM
The discussion about Village Regulation arrangements in legal products is closely related to theory of legal politics. Based on a legal politics review, the Village Regulation arra...
Discrimination
Discrimination
Discrimination refers to an act, policy, practice, or social structure that creates, maintains, or reinforces an advantage for some groups and their members over other groups and t...
The Importance of the Burden of Proof and Evidence in Discrimination Disputes
The Importance of the Burden of Proof and Evidence in Discrimination Disputes
Freedom and equality are constitutional principles that underpin the rule of law. This paper examines civil proceedings in discrimination disputes, focusing on the allocation of th...

Back to Top