Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Midwifery students’ experiences with practicing the midwifery philosophy of care during clinical practice in the hospital settings: a qualitative systematic review protocol
View through CrossRef
Objective:
This review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the experiences of midwifery students with providing care aligned with the midwifery philosophy of care during clinical practice in hospital settings.
Introduction:
Midwifery education, guided by the global standards of the International Confederation of Midwives, integrates theoretical knowledge with clinical practice to prepare students for delivering midwifery philosophy of care. However, implementing the principles of this philosophy of care, such as promoting physiological childbirth, woman-centered care, and shared decision-making, can be challenging within hospital settings.
Eligibility criteria:
Published qualitative studies conducted since 2005 reporting qualitative data on midwifery students’ (aged 18 years or older) experiences of providing midwifery care in hospital settings during their clinical practice will be included. Students’ experiences may encompass facilitators or barriers for practicing the principles of the midwifery philosophy of care. Studies conducted in Europe, New Zealand, and Australia will be considered, as these are settings where midwifery associations advocate for the midwifery philosophy of care in hospital environments.
Methods:
A systematic search will be conducted in CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PubMed, Embase.com, ERIC (Ovid), and Web of Science Core Collection for studies published in any language from 2005 to the present. Unpublished and gray literature will be sought through Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. The JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence will be followed for study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, synthesis through meta-aggregation, and assessment of confidence in the findings (ConQual approach). All steps will be performed independently by 2 reviewers.
Review registration:
PROSPERO CRD42024625908
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Midwifery students’ experiences with practicing the midwifery philosophy of care during clinical practice in the hospital settings: a qualitative systematic review protocol
Description:
Objective:
This review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the experiences of midwifery students with providing care aligned with the midwifery philosophy of care during clinical practice in hospital settings.
Introduction:
Midwifery education, guided by the global standards of the International Confederation of Midwives, integrates theoretical knowledge with clinical practice to prepare students for delivering midwifery philosophy of care.
However, implementing the principles of this philosophy of care, such as promoting physiological childbirth, woman-centered care, and shared decision-making, can be challenging within hospital settings.
Eligibility criteria:
Published qualitative studies conducted since 2005 reporting qualitative data on midwifery students’ (aged 18 years or older) experiences of providing midwifery care in hospital settings during their clinical practice will be included.
Students’ experiences may encompass facilitators or barriers for practicing the principles of the midwifery philosophy of care.
Studies conducted in Europe, New Zealand, and Australia will be considered, as these are settings where midwifery associations advocate for the midwifery philosophy of care in hospital environments.
Methods:
A systematic search will be conducted in CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PubMed, Embase.
com, ERIC (Ovid), and Web of Science Core Collection for studies published in any language from 2005 to the present.
Unpublished and gray literature will be sought through Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
The JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence will be followed for study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, synthesis through meta-aggregation, and assessment of confidence in the findings (ConQual approach).
All steps will be performed independently by 2 reviewers.
Review registration:
PROSPERO CRD42024625908.
Related Results
What is Analytic Philosophy
What is Analytic Philosophy
Special Issue: What is Analytic PhilosophyReferencesHaaparantaG. P. Baker and P. M. S. Hacker. Frege: Logical Excavations. Oxford, Blackwell, 1984.M. Dummett. The Interpretation of...
The Effect of Hard Work in Completing Midwifery Practice Reports on STIKes Kesehatan Baru Students
The Effect of Hard Work in Completing Midwifery Practice Reports on STIKes Kesehatan Baru Students
Currently the implementation of a competency-based curriculum in the Midwifery Diploma III study program has entered the professional education stage. This stage is a very importan...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Supporting Midwifery Students During Clinical Practice: Results of a Systematic Scoping Review
Supporting Midwifery Students During Clinical Practice: Results of a Systematic Scoping Review
Background
Midwifery educators are highly concerned about the quality of clinical support offered to midwifery students during clinical placement. The unpreparedness of...
Supporting Midwifery Students During Clinical Practice: Results of a Systematic Scoping Review (Preprint)
Supporting Midwifery Students During Clinical Practice: Results of a Systematic Scoping Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Midwifery educators are highly concerned about the quality of clinical support offered to midwifery students during clinical placement. The unpre...
/r/philosophy 2016-2017 AMA Series Recap + Survey!
/r/philosophy 2016-2017 AMA Series Recap + Survey!
This past academic year the moderators of /r/philosophy organised an
ongoing AMA series with 18 different philosophers working on a variety
of different topics, from metaphysics to...
Escaping the Shadow
Escaping the Shadow
Photo by Karl Raymund Catabas on Unsplash
The interests of patients at most levels of policymaking are represented by a disconnected patchwork of groups … “After Buddha was dead, ...

